similar to: FW: Internal DNS migrate to Bind9_DLZ

Hello Rowland, I have already checked and the DN's are in AD, see attached. SOA: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN SOA psad102zadprh.<domain>.corp. . 9766 3600 600 86400 3600 See below NS, but the 1st NS (zatprdc001) doesn't exsit, and I cannot find it anywhere. NS: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS zatprdc001.<domain>.corp. <domain>.corp. 3600

On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:52:28 +0100 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > Hai, >   > I've checked out the log you send and i re-read the complete thread. >   > Based on thats done and what i did see in you logs now, looks like a > * (wildcard)  entry is giving the problem. But i am not sure of that, > the wildcard bugs should be fixed, when i look in

Hello Marc I changed the rights back to 600 and root:root to sam.ldb and i think the rights of sam.ldb.d directory are correct. -rw------- 1 root root 16M Apr 2 17:29 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw------- 1 root root 10M Apr 2 17:29 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb -rw-rw---- 2 root bind 26M Apr 2 17:28 DC=DOMAINDNSZONES,DC=MY,DC=DOMAIN,DC=DE.ldb

On Sun, 2 Apr 2017 19:02:35 +0200 Karl Heinz Wichmann via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hallo Marc > > I change the loglevel to 10 > > > database > "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_9.so -d 10"; > > and i get following errors: > > 02-Apr-2017 18:47:44.389 samba_dlz: ldb: ldb_asprintf/set_errstring: > No

Hello all, ? this is my first Post in a Mailing List I hope everything goes fine. ? We are running a Samba 4 DC (4.0.14, Version 4.1.4 has the same problem) as a second DC in our Windows Environment. This server is in a second site. ? So after a while Samba 4 hangs and it is not possible to talk to the server via the RPC Protocol. So all samba-tools Commands like ?samba-tool drs showrepl? run

Hello all, I have two new server samba4, with isc-dhcp and Bind. ( Thanks to Louis 's scripts ) The AD was migrate from 2 Windows 2000 servers last friday, with a copy of them in a private lan. Today we have shutdown the old windows 2000 server and put the 2 new samba4 in place of them. The problem is that the DHCP does not update the DNS systematically... That works with laptops ( which

Hello All, I have 2 samba4 AD server with dhpd and dynamic DNS. I have well understand that for now it's not possible to have 2 DHCP server running in the same time. So I would have at a time only one dhcp server running. If the first server got a problem I want to manually start the isc-dhcp service in the second to rescue the system. But It's not working as I expected... If I switch

Hai,   Seeing : > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: configured writeable > zone '168.192.in-addr.arpa' > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: zone local.laurenz.ws/NONE: has no > NS records > Jan 23 14:55:40 samba01 named[3279]: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone > 'local.laurenz.ws'   Normaly you should see first the local.laurenz.ws

Hi guys, I'm facing a problems with samba4 + bind9_dlz that consuming my time for several days. Everything is working fine until samba4 need to update dns when I'm work with more than one DC server. When samba (or bind) need to reload all zones, the module bind9_dlz is shutting down and then all my environment stops and I need to restart the bind to up again. See my log: ... Jan

Hi samba team ! I'm face with a new problem on a new Samba PDC install (Debian 9). I don't know why, but systemd run multiples "rndc reconfig" commands during the init script. So the bind9 log file show : -> A successful start -> A failed reconfig (samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone) at each boot/reboot. So I need to restart bind9 each time manually. I created a wrapper

Hi, I have 2 self compiled samba 4 DCs running 4.7.7 on Centos 7.5. One of them is operating normally. On the other DC bind will not start. I turned up debugging on dlz_bind as per https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#Debugging_the_BIND9_DLZ_Module When I try to start named I get the following in the logs: May 10 13:19:44 vdc2 named[23773]: starting BIND

Another mistake : The louis's script ddns-kerberos-check.sh was not running in hourly.cron directory ( i make a chmod 770 to resolve that ) to recall here what I did: - I cloned the Windows 2000 server AD servers on a private network and I migrated to samba4 - Meanwhile, users have continued to use the Windows 2000 AD servers on the production network - I replaced the production servers

hai, ? I just noticed, after my pc woke up my A record disapearred. of my 64bit windows. ? ? Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: client 10.249.250.64#49271: update 'INTERNAL.DOMAIN.TLD/IN' denied Mar? 5 15:43:13 rtd-dc1 named[3717]: samba_dlz: cancelling transaction on zone

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > This is probably where you are going wrong. AD lives and dies on DNS, > your DC MUST be authoritative for the AD domain. ...but *is* authoritative! Simply DHCP server assign the ''old'' DNS, where all resolution fr the AD (sub)domain are forwarded to AD DNS... > Your AD clients should be using the DC as

Hello, I'm writing in regards to this issue I opened on GitHub: https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/issues/275 I am able to successfully use ldapsearch to query my Samba 4.9.4-Debian DC: ldapsearch -LLL -Y GSSAPI -H ldap://samba-dc.ad.example.com -b "dc=ad,dc=example,dc=com" "(objectClass=user)" "sAMAccountName" However, when I try to use python-ldap I

Hi everyone. I have a Linux nsupdate client sending dns update requests via sssd. Just gone from 4.1.2 to 4.1.3. I've done this: http://linuxcostablanca.blogspot.com.es/2013/09/samba4-bind9dlz-stale-dns-records-with.html After which the forward zone update is working fine: 2014-01-10T12:32:35.376142+01:00 hh16 named[4963]: samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone hh3.site

I suspect a zone overlap. Did you add an extra zone manualy in bind? Or something like this... You added : Zone1.Domain.TLD and then Domain.TLD But then with the reverse zones. Because this : > Jan 20 13:58:09 samba02 named[10811]: zone 2.168.192.in-addr.arpa/NONE: > has no NS records Does not look likes the samba_DLZ log lines but a pure bind log line. Review you bind config and

Hello, I have two samba 4.2.7-SerNet-Debian-8.wheezy AD servers. since few days now I have some winbind errorsthat block the server... It seems that they appears more and more frequently... ( about one time per day ) I have about 200 clients pc with windows 10, seven and XP. Last month I've migrated about 30 pc from seven to 10. Is there a relationship? In the following logs, you can see

I'm running DNS on Windows too, as it receives the update, and delete it it it also erases the Samba, Windows so I could see are not leaving this I create new entries. Entries in samba via command or RSAT are working. Thanks Em 29-06-2016 12:33, Rowland penny escreveu: > On 29/06/16 14:48, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Hello! >> >> >> What DNS server is running

Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > c) seems to use some ''random'' AD DNS, not the one in the site, for > > example. > Yes that is correct. ( The DC Locator Process does that ) > If you dont want that, you can assign by GPO a preffered server. > You can set it as preffered server per site in the GPO. ( note, a pc needs 2