Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "Not working with Windows clients where "Digitally sign communications (always)" is enabled"
2018 Oct 29
2
Not working with Windows clients where "Digitally sign communications (always)" is enabled
My Windows machine is not in any domain.
And the exactly same configuration (map to guest = bad user, guest ok
= no) works fine when the aforementioned Windows policy setting is not
enabled. In that case Samba at first doesn't know who my user is,
either. It lets Windows pop up a username/password dialog to ask me
for another user credential. Only after I input correct one Windows
successfully
2018 Oct 29
0
Not working with Windows clients where "Digitally sign communications (always)" is enabled
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:42:00 +0800
Jyunhao Shih via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Samba version: 4.7.6
> OS: Ubuntu 18.04.1 server
> Client: Windows 7 SP1 (Traditional Chinese)
>
> Problem:
> Normally, a client can connect to [homes] share on server.
> (I type \\serverIP\my_user_name and press enter,
> the username/password dialog pops up,
> I input
2018 Oct 29
1
Not working with Windows clients where "Digitally sign communications (always)" is enabled
Commenting out 'map to guest' works. Now Windows asks me for correct
username/password.
Thank you very much.
Though I can't help thinking what if one day I'm demanded to set up an
additional guest share on the same server...
> If you are not going to allow guest access, you might as well remove
> the 'map to guest' line.
>
> Try adding 'server signing =
2015 Mar 15
2
Dovecot 2.1.7 still accepting SSLv3 though disabled?
Hello,
I came across a strange problem with my Dovecot 2.1.7 installation
(updated Debian Wheezy) in regards to SSL/TLS connections.
My configuration is as follows:
$ dovecot -n | grep ssl
service imap-login {
ssl = yes
...
}
ssl_cert = <......
ssl_cipher_list =
2000 Nov 24
2
Getting the authctxt
My port forwarding changes require an authorization (authentication)
context in channel_connect_to(). I'd like to change the dispatch_*
functions so that they accept an Authctxt * instead of a void * (this
parameter is already used this way). In addition, I'd have to pass
the authctxt all the way down to channel_connect_to(). As a side
effect, it's possible to get rid of the global
2018 Oct 29
0
Not working with Windows clients where "Digitally sign communications (always)" is enabled
On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:43:54 +0800
Jyunhao Shih via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> My Windows machine is not in any domain.
> And the exactly same configuration (map to guest = bad user, guest ok
> = no) works fine when the aforementioned Windows policy setting is not
> enabled. In that case Samba at first doesn't know who my user is,
> either. It lets Windows
2020 Oct 05
2
isc-dhcp dynamic update problem
Hi,
I have a buster system configured as a DC running 4.11.13 from Louis's
repo.
I am trying to get https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9
working. Mostly it seems to work but there seems to be a problem with what
dhcpd writes into the leases file in the "on release" stanza.
When dhcpd writes the On Release stanza I get something like the
2015 Jun 24
2
Using isc-dhcp for DDNS with Samba4 internal DNS
El 24/06/15 a les 17:02, James ha escrit:
> On 6/24/2015 10:13 AM, Rowland Penny wrote:
>> On 24/06/15 14:17, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>>> El 24/06/15 a les 14:30, James ha escrit:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible to use isc-dhcp for DDNS with Samba internal DNS? I
>>>> would rather not use bind as I understand you can't
2019 Oct 10
2
dns replication error due to deleted records
El 10/10/19 a les 21:07, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit:
>>
> It works in a similar way to how I update dns records and I have similar
> records in AD and they replicate.
Oh, but they do. Until the replication chokes on those deleted records.
Never happened until September 25 (though I realized only today when a
manually added host resolved erratically).
>
> Can you post
2014 Apr 17
1
samba4 bind9_dlz and dhcp
Hai,
?
A bit off topic in the samba forum, but i thinks this is the best place to ask.
?
Im having?some troubles to get the dhcp server fully working with samba4.
I dont think this is a samba problem, but as i did say here maybe the best placy to ask..
?
It works, but not totaly. The strange thing is for example.
?
My debian client is now working.? It adds and deletes as it should.? No
2016 Jan 27
2
Securring DHCP, with DDNS
If I don't use DHCP failover, can you tell me how to do to to have
manually dhcp start method working...
I think I could made a mistake, this is what i did : ( I using Louis
script from "old set of script" directory :
https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ )
- On server S4 : resolv.conf set to S4 first and S4bis in second
- On server S4 : in dhcp-dyndns-debian.sh,
2019 Jan 10
4
samba_dnsupdate options: --use-samba-tool vs. --use-nsupdate, and dhcpd dynamic updates
On Thursday, January 10, 2019 1:43 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:09:01 +0000 (UTC)
>Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> As to the current issue, I am attemting to configure DHCP to update
>> DNS records with BIND9, as outlined in the Samba Wiki (with
>>
2015 Sep 03
7
samba_dlz: Failed to connect
On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Rowland Penny wrote:
> What are the permissions on /var/lib/samba/private/dns ?
Also don't forget the permissions on /var/lib/samba/private
If you're using sernet's packages, you'll have to chgrp it to to named or give
it o+x perms.
2016 Apr 21
2
[Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Re: Samba 4 more complete]]]]
Yes I think so
This is my /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf
ddns-updates on;
ddns-update-style interim;
#ddns-update-style none;
update-static-leases on;
option domain-name-servers cd1.home.cu;
option domain-name "home.cu";
default-lease-time 600;
max-lease-time 7200;
authoritative;
include "/etc/bind/rndc.key";
#include "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab";
# deny
2019 Aug 13
4
Configure DHCP to update DNS records with BIND9
Hello everyone,
I have configured my Samba as AD with BIND9_DLZ as backend and trying to
configure the ISC-DHCP-server to add the leases to BIND_DLZ
As described in the samba wiki:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_B
IND9
Everything is working fine so far, but I get an error message as shown below
in syslog:
Aug 13 14:32:28 SAMBA dhcpd[4635]:
2019 Oct 10
2
dns replication error due to deleted records
El 10/10/19 a les 20:41, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit:
>> It turns out that dc2 chokes on "\0ADEL" dns records, supposedly
>> deleted objects.
>
> What you have there is known as a tombstone record and Samba has a tool
> to remove them:
>
> samba-tool domain tombstones expunge NC
> --tombstone-lifetime=TOMBSTONE_LIFETIME
>
> Where
2016 Aug 12
2
Samba and POSIX ACLs
Hi everybody,
I know this has been discussed ad naseum, but I can't find an answer to my
question precisely.
My version of samba is 4.2.10.
Here's my question. I have POSIX ACLs set on a directory like this:
# file: .
# owner: root
# group: admin
# flags: -s-
user::rwx
user:apache:rwx
group::rwx
group:admin:rwx
mask::rwx
other::r-x
default:user::rwx
default:user:apache:rwx
2019 Jan 10
1
samba_dnsupdate options: --use-samba-tool vs. --use-nsupdate, and dhcpd dynamic updates
PRIOR THREAD: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-January/220292.html
In theĀ referenced prior thread, I had an issue of samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names causing a dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable error.
Ultimately, the solution kindly provided by Rowland was to insert dns update command = /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool into the [global] section of
2016 Apr 21
2
Winbind idmap question
Hi all,
Back on playing winbind I first configure PAM and NSS then tried id
<my_user_name> without setting for that user uidNumber.
This user get UID from idmap.
I set up uidNumber into LDAP tree for that user but this user still get uid
from idmap rather than from uidNumber attribute.
I set up another user with uidNumber into LDAP tree and after doing that I
tried "id
2007 Aug 06
4
[Patch] HttpServer.port reports the bound port
This is for when you pass mongrel 0 for the port and the OS assigns
an open one.
Corey
--- mongrel-1.0.1/lib/mongrel.rb 2007-08-05 15:29:59.000000000
-0700
+++ mongrel-1.0.1/lib/mongrel.rb.zero_port_fix 2007-08-05
15:29:23.000000000 -0700
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@
@socket = TCPServer.new(host, port)
@classifier = URIClassifier.new
@host = host
- @port = port