similar to: Not working with Windows clients where "Digitally sign communications (always)" is enabled

My Windows machine is not in any domain. And the exactly same configuration (map to guest = bad user, guest ok = no) works fine when the aforementioned Windows policy setting is not enabled. In that case Samba at first doesn't know who my user is, either. It lets Windows pop up a username/password dialog to ask me for another user credential. Only after I input correct one Windows successfully

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:42:00 +0800 Jyunhao Shih via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Samba version: 4.7.6 > OS: Ubuntu 18.04.1 server > Client: Windows 7 SP1 (Traditional Chinese) > > Problem: > Normally, a client can connect to [homes] share on server. > (I type \\serverIP\my_user_name and press enter, > the username/password dialog pops up, > I input

Commenting out 'map to guest' works. Now Windows asks me for correct username/password. Thank you very much. Though I can't help thinking what if one day I'm demanded to set up an additional guest share on the same server... > If you are not going to allow guest access, you might as well remove > the 'map to guest' line. > > Try adding 'server signing =

Hello, I came across a strange problem with my Dovecot 2.1.7 installation (updated Debian Wheezy) in regards to SSL/TLS connections. My configuration is as follows: $ dovecot -n | grep ssl service imap-login { ssl = yes ... } ssl_cert = <...... ssl_cipher_list =

My port forwarding changes require an authorization (authentication) context in channel_connect_to(). I'd like to change the dispatch_* functions so that they accept an Authctxt * instead of a void * (this parameter is already used this way). In addition, I'd have to pass the authctxt all the way down to channel_connect_to(). As a side effect, it's possible to get rid of the global

On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 22:43:54 +0800 Jyunhao Shih via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > My Windows machine is not in any domain. > And the exactly same configuration (map to guest = bad user, guest ok > = no) works fine when the aforementioned Windows policy setting is not > enabled. In that case Samba at first doesn't know who my user is, > either. It lets Windows

Hi, I have a buster system configured as a DC running 4.11.13 from Louis's repo. I am trying to get https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 working. Mostly it seems to work but there seems to be a problem with what dhcpd writes into the leases file in the "on release" stanza. When dhcpd writes the On Release stanza I get something like the

El 24/06/15 a les 17:02, James ha escrit: > On 6/24/2015 10:13 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 24/06/15 14:17, Luca Olivetti wrote: >>> El 24/06/15 a les 14:30, James ha escrit: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Is it possible to use isc-dhcp for DDNS with Samba internal DNS? I >>>> would rather not use bind as I understand you can't

El 10/10/19 a les 21:07, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> > It works in a similar way to how I update dns records and I have similar > records in AD and they replicate. Oh, but they do. Until the replication chokes on those deleted records. Never happened until September 25 (though I realized only today when a manually added host resolved erratically). > > Can you post

Hai, ? A bit off topic in the samba forum, but i thinks this is the best place to ask. ? Im having?some troubles to get the dhcp server fully working with samba4. I dont think this is a samba problem, but as i did say here maybe the best placy to ask.. ? It works, but not totaly. The strange thing is for example. ? My debian client is now working.? It adds and deletes as it should.? No

If I don't use DHCP failover, can you tell me how to do to to have manually dhcp start method working... I think I could made a mistake, this is what i did : ( I using Louis script from "old set of script" directory : https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ ) - On server S4 : resolv.conf set to S4 first and S4bis in second - On server S4 : in dhcp-dyndns-debian.sh,

On Thursday, January 10, 2019 1:43 PM, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:09:01 +0000 (UTC) >Billy Bob via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> >> As to the current issue, I am attemting to configure DHCP to update >> DNS records with BIND9, as outlined in the Samba Wiki (with >>

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Rowland Penny wrote: > What are the permissions on /var/lib/samba/private/dns ? Also don't forget the permissions on /var/lib/samba/private If you're using sernet's packages, you'll have to chgrp it to to named or give it o+x perms.

Yes I think so This is my /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf ddns-updates on; ddns-update-style interim; #ddns-update-style none; update-static-leases on; option domain-name-servers cd1.home.cu; option domain-name "home.cu"; default-lease-time 600; max-lease-time 7200; authoritative; include "/etc/bind/rndc.key"; #include "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; # deny

Hello everyone, I have configured my Samba as AD with BIND9_DLZ as backend and trying to configure the ISC-DHCP-server to add the leases to BIND_DLZ As described in the samba wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_B IND9 Everything is working fine so far, but I get an error message as shown below in syslog: Aug 13 14:32:28 SAMBA dhcpd[4635]:

El 10/10/19 a les 20:41, Rowland penny via samba ha escrit: >> It turns out that dc2 chokes on "\0ADEL" dns records, supposedly >> deleted objects. > > What you have there is known as a tombstone record and Samba has a tool > to remove them: > > samba-tool domain tombstones expunge NC > --tombstone-lifetime=TOMBSTONE_LIFETIME > > Where

Hi everybody, I know this has been discussed ad naseum, but I can't find an answer to my question precisely. My version of samba is 4.2.10. Here's my question. I have POSIX ACLs set on a directory like this: # file: . # owner: root # group: admin # flags: -s- user::rwx user:apache:rwx group::rwx group:admin:rwx mask::rwx other::r-x default:user::rwx default:user:apache:rwx

PRIOR THREAD: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2019-January/220292.html In the  referenced prior thread, I had an issue of samba_dnsupdate --verbose --all-names causing a dns_tkey_gssnegotiate: TKEY is unacceptable error. Ultimately, the solution kindly provided by Rowland was to insert dns update command = /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba_dnsupdate --use-samba-tool into the [global] section of

Hi all, Back on playing winbind I first configure PAM and NSS then tried id <my_user_name> without setting for that user uidNumber. This user get UID from idmap. I set up uidNumber into LDAP tree for that user but this user still get uid from idmap rather than from uidNumber attribute. I set up another user with uidNumber into LDAP tree and after doing that I tried "id

This is for when you pass mongrel 0 for the port and the OS assigns an open one. Corey --- mongrel-1.0.1/lib/mongrel.rb 2007-08-05 15:29:59.000000000 -0700 +++ mongrel-1.0.1/lib/mongrel.rb.zero_port_fix 2007-08-05 15:29:23.000000000 -0700 @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ @socket = TCPServer.new(host, port) @classifier = URIClassifier.new @host = host - @port = port