similar to: [ wxruby-Bugs-20211 ] Unresolved symbol due to linkage error

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2300 matches similar to: "[ wxruby-Bugs-20211 ] Unresolved symbol due to linkage error"

2010 Jan 28
5
Compiling problem on Ubuntu 9.10 64 bit
Hello, I''m trying to compile wxruby for Ruby 1.9 on Ubuntu Karmic 64 bit, but I can''t get it to work. I''ve already done this for the 32 bit version (on another machine, of course), so I don''t see where''s the problem with that. I thought, I had all neccessary libraries installed, but maybe you know better... After compiling for a long time, rake fails
2011 Jan 13
3
[LLVMdev] llc linkage problem
I am using LLVM 2.8 on Ubuntu 10.10. (new to both) I change name of instruction on XXXInstrInfo.td ( Sparc, X86 and XCore). I looked into XXXGenAsmWriter.inc and I have seen the new instruction name. But when I run llc for the three targets it prints out the old instruction name. For example for XCore I change “divs” to “sdiv” like >From => def DIVS_l3r :
2010 Dec 05
1
[LLVMdev] Weak private linkage for Objective C
Hi all, I've been subscribed to this list on-and-off and always found it very helpful. I'm facing the problem of compiling a project in Objective C with LLVM in a Darwin environment. There is a certain Objective C protocol that appears in two .m files, and so the corresponding l_OBJC_PROTOCOL and l_OBJC_LABEL_PROTOCOL symbols appear in both .o files. The problem is that while these
2001 Nov 14
1
unresolved symbols in loop
Hello, i have downloaded the kernel 2.4.14 and the correspondig ext3 patch ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz. After this i extract the archiv at /usr/src, renamed the dir linux to linux-2.4.14 and made a symlink linux-2.4. I changed to the directory linux-2.4 and add the patch as decsribed on the website gunzip < ~/ext3-2.4-0.9.15-2414.gz | patch -p1. There was no error and the patch was successful.
2008 Mar 13
0
[Bug 10547] nouveau: __ucmpdi2 unresolved on ppc32
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 --- Comment #11 from Danny <obiwan at mailmij.org> 2008-03-13 01:15:37 PST --- I just add here a link to marcheu's patch to do this in drm instead (to make it easy for ppl who want to avoid rebuilding their kernel: http://icps.u-strasbg.fr/~marchesin/nvdri/ucmpdi2.diff d. -- Configure bugmail:
2008 Apr 19
0
[Bug 10547] nouveau: __ucmpdi2 unresolved on ppc32
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 Stephane Marchesin <marchesin at icps.u-strasbg.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #12 from Stephane
2003 Jun 17
1
cannot load sch_tbf for unresolved
Hello everyone, I'm new here. I'm trying to do tc. I've compiled sch_tbf into module, but failed to insmod it. It says some unresolved. Give a little hint, please. thanks
2005 Dec 01
0
Unresolved Questions for Active Directory Kerberos/LDAP/AD4Unix or SFU35 support?
I have been digging around for information on this in either online and published books, but I haven't yet found the answer. I am interested in AD connective through AD Kerberos/LDAP/SFU or AD Kerberos/LDAP/AD4Unix. I have a pure win2k3 environment, so there is no backwards support via PDC emulator. Published books document older NT-like environments. *cries* If there are any documents,
2007 Sep 04
2
Unresolved variable in `libupsclient-config'
Tags: patch, upstream Hi, when configuring nut 2.2.0 the variable/symbol `@SSL_LDFLAGS@' is not resolved by the libupsclient-config script. The attached patch changes `@SSL_CFLAGS@' to `@LIBSSL_CFLAGS@' `@SSL_LDFLAGS@' to `@LIBSSL_LDFLAGS@' which should solve this issue. Regards, -octo -- Florian octo Forster Hacker in training GnuPG: 0x91523C3D http://verplant.org/
2006 Oct 03
0
Xgl/Compiz - Kernel, ATI, Console, and Multihead problems still unresolved
I've been avidly updating mesa, xgl, and compiz, every week (from the portage-xgl overlay) hoping to solve some of these problems: * Using ati-drivers-8.29.6 xgl crashes complaining about lacking dri, so i'm using 8.27.10. * Using 2.6.18 kernels, the ati-drivers-8.27.10 don't compile when building the drm module. * My laptop automatically switchs to vt1 when init services fail
2007 Nov 12
0
[Bug 10547] nouveau: __ucmpdi2 unresolved on ppc32
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 bjt23 at cornell.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bjt23 at cornell.edu ------- Comment #5 from bjt23 at cornell.edu 2007-11-12 01:56 PST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > More
2006 May 18
0
[Bug 477] New: ip_conntrack_ftp.o: unresolved symbol ip_conntrack
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=477 Summary: ip_conntrack_ftp.o: unresolved symbol ip_conntrack Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ip_conntrack AssignedTo:
2006 May 20
3
[Bug 477] ip_conntrack_ftp.o: unresolved symbol ip_conntrack
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=477 netfilter@linuxace.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter@linuxace.com Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|
2007 Aug 24
0
[LLVMdev] etc/llvm/c contains unresolved specify %llvmcc1%
After I uncommented line 55 in etc/llvm/c, I tried again to use llvmc to compile a program, to no avail: $ llvmc -c main.c llvmc: Can't find program '%llvmcc1%' I have, however, a cc1 from llvm-gcc-4.0: $ find dist -name cc1 dist/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.1/cc1 Blindly substituting this into the etc/llvm/c file brings me only so far: $ /usr/src/llvm/dist/bin/llvm-as:
2004 Mar 04
3
[Bug 807] Compilation failure--> ld: Unresolved: xcrypt shadow_pw
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=807 Summary: Compilation failure--> ld: Unresolved: xcrypt shadow_pw Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.8p1 Platform: Alpha OS/Version: OSF/1 Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: Build system AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org
2004 Sep 17
1
Zaptel compile error - unresolved symbols
Hello - any help is greatly appreciated. I am trying to compile zaptel on debian 2.4.26-1-386. I have a single X100P card installed. When I run '/usr/src/zaptel/make clean;make install' I get the following: depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/misc/torisa.o depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.26-1-386/misc/zaptel.o /sbin/depmod -a depmod: ***
2005 Jan 05
0
Re: Speex codec problem (unresolved ?) = Fixed
>> >> After looking at the source I had also tried to increase the buffer size >> from 8000 to 16000, but that made other codecs (like lin_to_g729) choke, >> and >> I still had the problem... >> >> I like speex and would like to use it (as I find ilbc a bit too scratchy) >> >> I am running Asterisk CVS-HEAD-11/16/04-17:19:53 and speex-1.0.4
2017 Mar 29
0
Nodejs010 Packages giving unresolved dependency error when building the nodejs packages
Hi, I am trying to built an ISO with nodejs010 packages but when I run the command "repoclosure -a x86_64 -r <local-repository-name>" to check its further dependencies, it is giving unresolved dependencies error. Example: package: nodejs010-node-gyp-3.2.0-2.el7.centos.noarch from Harman (it's a local repo name) unresolved deps: npm(minimatch) < 0:4
2020 Jan 11
0
Unresolved dependencies when upgrade on centOS 8
On 11/01/2020 05:40, Ebed wrote: > Hi, > > Guys i got unresolved dependencies when trying to upgrade centOS 8, what > should i do to fix this? > > > [root at ws1 ebedsat]# dnf upgrade > Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:27 ago on Sat 11 Jan 2020 12:16:02 PM > WIB. > Error: > Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package >
2020 Jan 16
0
CentOS 8: several packages have unresolved dependencies after "dnf update all "
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 07:24, Philippe Piot <piot at nicadd.niu.edu> wrote: > > Thanks, Stephen. Just for completeness, the repo I am currently pointing to > are > > [piot at paris opal]$ sudo dnf update > CentOS-8 - AppStream > 775 kB/s | 5.8 MB 00:07 > CentOS-8 - Base > 798 kB/s | 4.0 MB 00:05 > CentOS-8 -