similar to: CTDB potential locking issue

Hi Martin Many thanks for the detailed response. A few follow-ups inline: On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:19 AM Martin Schwenke <martin at meltin.net> wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:25 +0100, David C via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, > Samba > > 4.7.1

Hi David, On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 19:34:25 +0100, David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, Samba > 4.7.1 > > The node network is a direct 1Gb link > > Storage is Cephfs > > ctdb status is OK > > It seems to be running well so far but I'm frequently seeing the following >

How did you mount your cephfs filesystem? Am 18. September 2018 20:34:25 MESZ schrieb David C via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >Hi All > >I have a newly implemented two node CTDB cluster running on CentOS 7, >Samba >4.7.1 > >The node network is a direct 1Gb link > >Storage is Cephfs > >ctdb status is OK > >It seems to be running well so far but

Hi Martin I just found the file, it's a config file that about 250 hosts read every half an hour so it makes sense this is getting some contention. However, the strange thing is, the share the file is in is a read-only share: [dist$] comment = Windows dist path = /path/to/share wide links = Yes browseable = Yes read only = Yes guest only = Yes

We've only seen this error once, just occurred. We were having domain join issues. Enter ******@*******.local's password: ../../source3/lib/dbwrap/dbwrap_ctdb.c:855 ERROR: new_seqnum[10] != old_seqnum[8] + (0 or 1) after failed TRANS3_COMMIT - this should not happen! secrets_store_JoinCtx: dbwrap_transaction_commit() failed for SOMDEV libnet_join_joindomain_store_secrets:

Le 25/11/2019 ? 09:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba a ?crit?: > I tested Friday also with a W7 pc. > Not working, im try to see what i can do today on this problem. > > Greetz, > > Louis Hi Louis, Thanks for your help. I'm still investigating on it, but sadly i cannot upgrade to 4.11 as those servers cannot reach external repositories for security reasons (those servers

Hello, I'm having a permissions problem I just can't quite figure out. I can not access any directory that is owned by my userid if the permissions are 700. If I change them to 770, with my default group on the directory, then I can access the directory. This was working fine with Fedora 19 for several years, and it broke when I upgraded to Fedora 22, and still broken with F23. my

On 3/3/2016 2:02 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > It would help if you would provide some information about your system: > - Samba version - smb.conf - "ls -ld" of the directory - etc. Regards, > Marc Hello, version: samba-4.3.4-1.fc23.x86_64 ls -ld: ls -ld /home/blaster drwxrwx--- 76 blaster users 4096 Mar 3 14:15 /home/blaster testparm Load smb config files from

I've just upgraded my DM from samba 4.5 to 4.8, using luois repos (also, debian jessie -> stretch). I'm experimenting some troubles on some shares, seems that both guest access and 'machine account' access does not work. The share is rather simple: [wpkg] browseable = No comment = WPKG Automated Software Deploying System force create mode = 0664 force directory mode =

Hi, We are running a samba fileserver, access controlled using posix acl (right 770, with users/groups on the filesystem level. Therefore samba shares look like this: [share] path = /srv/academic read only = no writable = yes create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 Now certain users complain that they cannot access certain folders, but looking at the folders from the linux fileystem, their

Dear all, I experience now a strange bug with Samba 4.1.11 : When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : logon script = employee.bat But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even "%G.bat", it doesn't work : * logon script = %g.bat * logon script = %G.bat * logon script = "%G.bat" In the logs, there was a message showing that Samba was

On 2017-11-13 12:33, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 12:05:33 +0100 > Sven Schwedas <sven.schwedas at tao.at> wrote: > >> /etc/hostname:villach-file >> /etc/hosts:# The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts >> /etc/hosts:::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback >> /etc/hosts:ff02::1 ip6-allnodes >>

Hi, I'm hoping somebody can point me in the right direction. My samba version is samba-4.2.10-6.2.el7_2.x86_64. I have lots of daily core dumps (~20 on each machine daily) and I have no clear idea why. I'm including the stack trace below. It looks like the problem is related to "invalid lock_order". Any ideas? Thanks, Sergei #0 0x00007fc5a34945f7 in raise () from

Mandi! Rowland penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Even though your users may have the same username in AD as in the NT4-style > domain, they are different users, so a few thoughts. You have 'map to guest > = bad user', so I take it you must have 'guest ok = yes' set in the shares > (you haven't shown us the shares), so try changing 'bad user' to

Dear Ricky, Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: * I am using Samba 4.1.11. * server role = classic primary domain controller * domain logons = yes * domain master = yes * When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : * logon script = employee.bat * But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even

Dear Ricky, Thanks a lot for your answer. But I still have two problems: 1. I am not using samba as AD DC but as PDC. 2. What I would need is the primary group... Do you thinks %WORKGROUP% could work ? 3. And should I use %WORKGROUP% in smb.conf or in batch login script... Thanks a lot in advance for your help... Denis Le 18.12.2014 21:58, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > Dennis, if you

Dear all, As nobody seems to know what the problem could be, I think it must be an important bug in Samba 4 that "forget" to replace %G or %g with the group name. Could someone confirm that it is a bug and that I should fill one, in samba bugzilla ? Thank you very much, Denis -------- Message original -------- OBJET: Re: [Samba] Samba "%G" replacement not

Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: > > * I am using Samba 4.1.11. > * server role = classic primary domain controller > * domain logons = yes > * domain

Hi, My configuration: 1 server with Samba4 as a DC (dc01) 1 server with Samba4 as a file/print server DC seems to work fine. file server is connected to DC using this howto https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba/Domain_Member smbd, nmbd, winbindd is running on file/print server. Bu when I try with a windows client (a windows 2003 server) to connect to file server. client ask for a user

Le 31.12.2014 17:19, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but