similar to: Can't copy large files to Windows with SMB2/3 on 10G network

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Can't copy large files to Windows with SMB2/3 on 10G network"

2019 Feb 15
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
> > That's interesting indeed. The verbose logs and network trace would tell > us more. > I've enabled verbose/debug logging on the client side. Here are a few operations from the log, and my observations on them: 1) Why is the log saying `SMB2` everywhere? Shouldn't it be saying `SMB3`? 2) Is this normal -- fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: Calculated size 157 length 156 mismatch mid
2018 Sep 18
1
Can't copy large files to Windows with SMB2/3 on 10G network
>> - smbclient [no -m option] is OK and slow (uses default SMB1/NT1?) >> - mount.cifs -o vers=1.0 is OK and slow >> - smbclient -m SMB2 (or -m SMB3) fails > The above is the interesting case, as this is much > easier to debug (in user space) than the kernel > client. > > Can you give more details on *exactly* HOW smbclient -mSMB3 > fails ? This is really
2019 Feb 14
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com> writes: > I found something interesting in /proc/fs/cifs/Stats. Notice the > "QueryDirectories > Failed" number. This keeps increasing as along as `ls > -lR` is running. That's interesting indeed. The verbose logs and network trace would tell us more. -- Aurélien Aptel / SUSE Labs Samba Team GPG: 1839 CB5F 9F5B FB9B AA97
2017 Nov 03
3
samba 4.x slow ...
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: > Hi Micha, > > no, I have to this. I'm normally just check what smbstatus shows: > > 33837   BGC\pkoch    users        XXX (ipv4:XXX:51118)    SMB2_10 > > Bye the way - 45 MB/s is not so bad, I just wanted to know if it's > possible to get 90MB/s or at 10G a little bit more. >
2018 Sep 17
0
Can't copy large files to Windows with SMB2/3 on 10G network
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 09:53:59AM +0200, MI via samba wrote: > We have a 10G network with a mix of Windows 10 and MacOS 10.12 machines, and > a CentOS 7 machine. > > Copying large files "fast" from the CentOS machine to Windows, using SMB2 or > SMB3 fails almost every time, at the end of the copy. > - With SMB1, it seems to work, but is much slower. > - Copying to
2017 Feb 14
1
sieve file backend: invalid option `active=~/.dovecot.sieve'
On 14/02/2017 14:44, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 13-2-2017 om 18:15 schreef Ben: >> Hi, >> >> I am seeing the followin error in my logs (doveconf -n at the bottom >> of this mail): >> >> Feb 13 16:59:59 mxf dovecot: lmtp(45560, bp at example.com): Error: >> cs3NOQ7moVj4sQXXXXX: sieve: sieve file backend: invalid option >>
2017 Feb 13
3
sieve file backend: invalid option `active=~/.dovecot.sieve'
Hi, I am seeing the followin error in my logs (doveconf -n at the bottom of this mail): Feb 13 16:59:59 mxf dovecot: lmtp(45560, bp at example.com): Error: cs3NOQ7moVj4sQXXXXX: sieve: sieve file backend: invalid option `active=~/.dovecot.sieve' Feb 13 16:59:59 mxf dovecot: lmtp(45560, bp at example.com): Error: cs3NOQ7moVj4sQXXXXX: sieve: failed to access user's Sieve script
2017 Feb 14
0
sieve file backend: invalid option `active=~/.dovecot.sieve'
Op 13-2-2017 om 18:15 schreef Ben: > Hi, > > I am seeing the followin error in my logs (doveconf -n at the bottom > of this mail): > > Feb 13 16:59:59 mxf dovecot: lmtp(45560, bp at example.com): Error: > cs3NOQ7moVj4sQXXXXX: sieve: sieve file backend: invalid option > `active=~/.dovecot.sieve' > Feb 13 16:59:59 mxf dovecot: lmtp(45560, bp at example.com): Error:
2020 Sep 25
1
cifsacl not working
On 9/25/20 12:23 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 25/09/2020 17:15, Ken Bass via samba wrote: >> On 9/25/20 5:14 AM, Aur?lien Aptel wrote: >>> Ken Bass via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes: >>>> Can you please expand on this, I am confused as to what you are >>>> suggesting.? If 'getent pass' works properly and shows no
2008 May 18
1
Ruby on Rails developer Job
Hi, we are a Germany / US based company, looking for experienced Ruby on Rails developer for several projects. The projects ate moduar and planned for a longer timeframe, so we are looking for continous relationship wizth the coders. The jobs is for freelancers/contractors or part-time employees. Andreas Wilkens Please apply by email to jobs-MXf/qEKz1R7qlBn2x/YWAg@public.gmane.org (Attn:
2017 Nov 06
2
samba 4.x slow ...
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:35:06AM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: > Setup:  Server 2x10GB NIC, client 1x1GB: > > Using smbclient with -mSMB3 I get an average of 52000 KiloBytes/sec (before > 45000), > > using NFS (v3) from the same server I get  108000 KiloBytes/sec an more > (mount ; cp; umount; ...) So I don't think it's the client. The smbclient
2019 Feb 15
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com> writes: > 1) Why is the log saying `SMB2` everywhere? Shouldn't it be saying > `SMB3`? "SMB3" is mostly marketing, it inherits almost everything from SMB2 hence why it's often handled by SMB2 code. You will see this in Samba, Wireshark, Linux, and even Microsoft specification "MS-SMB2" which actually covers both
2019 Feb 16
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
> > > 2) Is this normal -- fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: Calculated size 157 length 156 > > mismatch mid 11907 > > Could be a bug or miscalculated length + non critical warning, I also > see this on master kernel. Either way I doubt it's slowing everything down. > Should I file a bug for this? > ## OPERATION 1 - `ls debug.log` -- simply listing a single file. Does >
2020 Feb 06
0
No announcement for kernel 3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7
Hi I don't know where the announcements go. I cloned https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/kernel.git and grabbed the changelog section pasted below from the git diff in SPECS/kernel.spec (commit dated 4 Feb 2020) Regards +* Thu Dec 12 2019 Frantisek Hrbata <fhrbata at hrbata.com> [3.10.0-1062.12.1.el7] +- [powerpc] powerpc/pseries: Remove confusing warning message (Gustavo Duarte) [1780148
2017 Dec 14
1
smbclient and Win10 PRO
I am having a problem with getting smbclient to interact with a Window 10 PRO/64 bit machine. The smbclient is being run from a FreeBSD-11.1/amd64 machine. smbclient - Version 4.6.11 Windows 10 Pro - version 1709 I have tried numerous methods, like the following: smbclient -I 192.168.0.102 -L HP-ENVY protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_RESET In every instance, it ends with the
2019 Feb 16
2
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
On 16/02/2019 02:43, Saurabh Nanda via samba wrote: >>> 2) Is this normal -- fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: Calculated size 157 length 156 >>> mismatch mid 11907 >> Could be a bug or miscalculated length + non critical warning, I also >> see this on master kernel. Either way I doubt it's slowing everything down. >> > Should I file a bug for this? > > >>
2013 Nov 19
0
Best Way to Import HC-X800 1080 60p/50p MTS to iMovie HD
Panasonic HC-X800 is expert HD camcorder with 3MOS system Pro, shooting 1080 60p/50p AVCHD footage at bitrates of up to 28Mbit/sec and exhibiting outstanding HD images with minimum noise. The HC-X800 records AVCHD MTS videos on P2 card. You may want to edit AVCHD MTS videos you shoot with iMovie. The problem is that iMovie often cannot import and recognize the 60p/50p footages, nor can it accept
2016 Oct 22
5
CTDB and locking issues in 4.4.6 (Classic domain)
Hi Ralph, I applied the patch to a new build of Sernet 4.4.6 SRPM. I could still open the file from both hosts, and in fact this time I could actually open it on the same host without any problems: host 1: smbclient -U ajc //172.31.0.120/ifa_v ... smb: \jmi\Corporate Accounting\ISL Ltd Accounts\2016\1609\> open "201609 213_ ISL Balance sheet variance analysis.xls" open file
2017 Nov 03
4
samba 4.x slow ...
just to verify basic facts: Did you cross check vie network sniff, on which SMB protocol versions Server + Win 7 clients agree ? Or did you pin down via registry ? AFAIK only starting with win 8 or win 10 clients you could ask with powershell, which protocol version is in use. Did you also cross check samba logs for a name resolution issue ( windows names, not DNS) if one of your boxes is an
2017 Aug 31
0
Windows SMB2 client doing excessive, inefficient SMB2 Find (and other) requests
Hello Ralph, many thanks for your fast reply and help with this issue! :-) Am 31.08.2017 um 15:43 schrieb Ralph Böhme: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 03:37:07PM +0200, awl1 via samba wrote: >> Before I follow your advice to move this whole issue/topic to the >> samba-technical alias and start over there with a clean description of the >> scenario and the findings, I have two