similar to: Is there a limit on Number of users connecting share

Hey Rowland! Thanks for response. I admire your work. Please find my responses inline. On 08/20/2018 02:19 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:06:48 +0530 > Amit via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Dear Devels, >> >> samba-4.2.3-10.el7.x86_64 >> >> # vim smb.conf >> [global] >> workgroup =

On Mon, 20 Aug 2018 11:06:48 +0530 Amit via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear Devels, > > samba-4.2.3-10.el7.x86_64 > > # vim smb.conf > [global] > workgroup = MYGROUP > server string = Samba Server Version %v > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > security = user > passdb

Dear all, I experience now a strange bug with Samba 4.1.11 : When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : logon script = employee.bat But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even "%G.bat", it doesn't work : * logon script = %g.bat * logon script = %G.bat * logon script = "%G.bat" In the logs, there was a message showing that Samba was

Hello, I'm running Samba 3.6.6-1 on my x64 Arch Linux installation. I recently decided to have my samba share support NTFS's Alternate Data Streams by using streams_xattr or streams_depot. With streams_xattr I discovered that if I copy a file having an ADS from a win7 box, on the linux console, I can see the ADS as an xattr attached to the file. However when I copy the file back to my

Dear Ricky, Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: * I am using Samba 4.1.11. * server role = classic primary domain controller * domain logons = yes * domain master = yes * When I define a fixed-name as logon script in smb.conf, it works : * logon script = employee.bat * But if I try either %g.bat or %G.bat, or even

Dear Ricky, Thanks a lot for your answer. But I still have two problems: 1. I am not using samba as AD DC but as PDC. 2. What I would need is the primary group... Do you thinks %WORKGROUP% could work ? 3. And should I use %WORKGROUP% in smb.conf or in batch login script... Thanks a lot in advance for your help... Denis Le 18.12.2014 21:58, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > Dennis, if you

Dear all, As nobody seems to know what the problem could be, I think it must be an important bug in Samba 4 that "forget" to replace %G or %g with the group name. Could someone confirm that it is a bug and that I should fill one, in samba bugzilla ? Thank you very much, Denis -------- Message original -------- OBJET: Re: [Samba] Samba "%G" replacement not

Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but to summarize: > > * I am using Samba 4.1.11. > * server role = classic primary domain controller > * domain logons = yes > * domain

Using the latest SerNet 4.8.1 build, I'm seeing users being unable to write into newly created shares until smbd is restarted. Here's the relevant log part: [2018/06/14 16:04:29.229329, 5] ../source3/smbd/filename.c:662(unix_convert) unix_convert begin: name = New folder, dirpath = , start = New folder [2018/06/14 16:04:29.229375, 5] ../source3/smbd/vfs.c:1458(check_reduced_name)

Le 31.12.2014 17:19, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Le 29.12.2014 20:46, Ricky Nance a ?crit : > > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Denis BUCHER <dbucherml at hsolutions.ch> wrote: > > Dear Ricky, > > Yes, in my original post, below, I gave some details about smb.conf, but

I need to temporarily disable a share for a few days, I remember there was an entry I could add to the share definition to temporarily disable the share (I think it was disabled=true or enabled=false) but I can't remember what it was for sure, nor can I find it in the manual. what is it ?

Hello I am trying to integrate OS X 10.10.4 clients into existing Samba infractructure run by our IT department. We are currently using Samba 4.2.3. File share is stored on iSCSI array with ext4 filesystem which should support both ACL and XATTR. We are trying to setup vfs_fruit module to avoid possible performance problems on OS X clients. We do NOT user netatalk. Current vfs_fruit config:

these lines were an option before but have already been marked as comments in my config. same behaviour as before, color tag shows for round about a second and disappears suddenly. Martin > Am 05.06.2020 um 09:23 schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > Am 6/5/20 um 8:33 AM schrieb Martin Steiner / 3MF GmbH: >> Any more ideas? It?s not displaying

I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the most part they have. The one problem I've ran into however, is that I'm getting errors any time I or robocopy attempt to change the ownership to

Hello Everyone, I've install Samba4, (Version 4.1.6 and Centos6). I configured the public resource for all users but the strange is that some users can't make operation (read, modify, delete) in the root path "/public", but these can inside for folder "/public/test" . In the "Computer Management -> Shared Folders -> Shares" I select the resource

On 28/03/2023 19:47, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: > > On 3/28/23 11:22, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 28/03/2023 18:43, Peter Carlson via samba wrote: >>> bumping the log to 5, there are a few more lines right before >>> NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED, could the EA error be a clue? >> >> I do not think so, that is what you are trying

I've just upgraded my DM from samba 4.5 to 4.8, using luois repos (also, debian jessie -> stretch). I'm experimenting some troubles on some shares, seems that both guest access and 'machine account' access does not work. The share is rather simple: [wpkg] browseable = No comment = WPKG Automated Software Deploying System force create mode = 0664 force directory mode =

Le 25/11/2019 ? 09:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba a ?crit?: > I tested Friday also with a W7 pc. > Not working, im try to see what i can do today on this problem. > > Greetz, > > Louis Hi Louis, Thanks for your help. I'm still investigating on it, but sadly i cannot upgrade to 4.11 as those servers cannot reach external repositories for security reasons (those servers

I'm running Samba 3.4.7 on Ubuntu 10.04. This is a recent upgrade and we've starting experience a sporadic problem after this upgrade. When users are browsing through Windows Explorer they sometimes run across folders that appear as unassociated files. This requires the user to click the 'Refresh' button in Windows Explorer to properly see the folders. The files and folders are

On 2/17/2016 5:00 AM, Rowland penny wrote: > On 17/02/16 00:03, Ian wrote: >> I've recently attempted to migrate some windows server files over to >> samba 4 hosted on a FreeNAS server. >> >> Using robocopy with the /copyall switch, I expected everything, >> including ACL's and ownership information to transfer over. For the >> most part they have.