similar to: Installation options in howto samba 4.9 r2 via source

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

Hello list, I tried to set up a folder on our fileserver domain member, so I can deploy software for users' machines, but is not working. If I put the software inside "netlogon" it installs correctly. \\172.16.1.7\storage\programs Auth Users - read & execute, list folder contents, read and write Do I need other permissions? -- Elias Pereira

Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

hello guys, In my tests lab did the migration ldap base of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADCD. It's possible to migrate directories and files from users of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADDC? -- Elias Pereira

On 22/12/14 17:47, Elias Pereira wrote: > And now, I run the command "samba-tool user list" and the result is as > follows: > > *# samba-tool user list* > *ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb* > *Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password from secrets.ldb: Could not find entry to match > filter:

Found it! :) I thought in make a script more or less that way. #!/bin/bash # GROUP=ADM GUID=10000 # Domain Users UID=10000 # get the next ID ? for USER in $(samba-tool group listmembers $GROUP) do samba-tool user edit $USER -H ldap://samdom.example.com \ -U administrato --nis-domain=samdom \ --unix-home=/home/$USER \ --uid-number=${NEXTID} \

> > Just a thought, is dhcpcd5 installed ? No. Does this happen on the XEN Server of Client (guest OS). If Xen, which xen version? xen 7.0.0 The command cat lan-dev-$(ip route | grep default |awk '{ print $5 }').network shows nothing. Do I need to create this file? His content is just my interface. Ex: eth0? On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:54 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba

> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access the security tab.

hi, I created a lab to test adding the eduPerson schema. I took the schema from the link below and followed the wiki to add the schema. hxxps:// github.com/REFEDS/eduperson/blob/master/schema/activedirectory/eduPerson.adschema.ldf I split the ldif into 3 parts. attrs.ldif classes.ldif auxiliaryClass.ldif At first there was no error when adding the ldifs with the commands given in the wiki. To

Hi Rowland, Could you tell me what the correct permissions are for the bind9 files? On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 5:46?PM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > The only 'problem' I can see is that the group is set to 'bind' instead >> of 'root', why is this ? > > If I'm not mistaken, I did it on the wiki, but maybe I needed an older >

root at fileserver:~# getfacl /home/dados/ getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: home/dados/ # owner: root # group: domain\040admins user::rwx group::rwx other::--- Still with the same problem. No security tab on windows machine. :( The "Administrator" and "Domain Admins" also need to have an unix attribute? On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 4:08 PM,

On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 10:21:07 -0200 Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > Correcting! :) > > #!/bin/bash > # > GROUP=ADM > GUID=10000 # Domain Users > UID=10000 # get the next ID ? > > for USER in $(samba-tool group listmembers $GROUP) > do > samba-tool user edit $USER --nis-domain=samdom \ > --unix-home=/home/$USER \ >

Hello Andrew, What's the explanation for when the log level is set to 5, the error NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT doesn't appear, but when it's at the default log level, it does? On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 10:33?AM Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> wrote: > hi Andrew, thanks for the help!!! > > It seems to me the LDAP process being busy would be the root cause here. >>

The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at

Hello, Thanks for the feedback Garming!!! 👍 On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 12:35 AM Garming Sam <garming at catalyst.net.nz> wrote: > Hi, > > While I think we have most of the 2012 schema problems under control > now, there's still quite a bit of work to get the functional level > things working. In order to actually raise the level, we still need to > implement a number of

1.5 seconds is pretty long, I would look into what those queries are. I would also look into repeated queries, sometimes these things are clients stuck in a loop where they don't complete because they expect some termination condition. Andrew Bartlett On Tue, 2024-04-02 at 09:25 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > The saga continues... > I've spent a whole day with log level 5

Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another

Guys, In my lab test when I run the command "net groupmap list" the result is as follows: *# net groupmap list* *Domain Admins (S-1-5-21-187220369-3628530160-3539241734-512) -> 512* *Domain Users (S-1-5-21-187220369-3628530160-3539241734-513) -> 513* *Domain Guests (S-1-5-21-187220369-3628530160-3539241734-514) -> 514* *Domain Computers

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 14:21 -0300, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello?Andrew, > > 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is > set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but > when it is at the default log level, it does? I don't have an explanation for this, sorry. ?Have you looked into the 1.5 second queries, what is sending them and