similar to: Samba and CNAME

You can remember this. If you join a server, that make sure that that servers "hostname" gets an A and PTR record. The PTR is most important. Now if you creat a CNAME now, through PTR it knows its "original" hostname And kerberos works, this is how i do all my setups. As example. REALM : INTERNAL.EXAMPLE.COM FQDN : test-dc1.internal.example.com Hostname: test-dc1 SPN

Hello, On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 15:00:58 +0200 Henry Jensen via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > we successfully migrated from a Samba 3.x NT Domain to a Samba AD Domain > using Samba 4.7.x. > > However, there are still some issues and I hope for your help. > > The biggest problem so far follows: > > For historical reasons our Samba file servers carry a lot

31.01.2023 08:55, Matt Savin via samba ?????: > In group policies use DNS aliases, then you'll need to change only DNS > entries for these aliases to point to a new host(s). I'd say don't use simple dns aliases (cnames) in a DC, but use SPNs instead (see samba-tool spn). This will manage CNAMEs too, and also manages the KRB tickets and proper autentication of the server to the

On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 10:13 +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > 31.01.2023 08:55, Matt Savin via samba ?????: > > In group policies use DNS aliases, then you'll need to change only > > DNS > > entries for these aliases to point to a new host(s). > > I'd say don't use simple dns aliases (cnames) in a DC, but use SPNs > instead > (see samba-tool

31.01.2023 18:33, Mark Foley via samba wrote: > 1.01.2023 10:13, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> I'd say don't use simple dns aliases (cnames) in a DC, but use SPNs instead > > In an AD Domain I mean, not in a DC. > This bit is confusing. The DNS runs on the DC, so what do you mean "not in a DC"? I wanted to write "don't use simple DNS aliases in an

Hai, ? Im testing out with some dns things.. And i think i have seen more people about this.. ? Debian 7 ( wheezy )?samba 4.1.17 debian backports. only 1 DC, no member, just 1 DC. ? I have added multiple DNS records and zones with the windows tool. sofare good, works ok... ? in one of my zones changed the CNAME of a record. ? for example. ? websitename1.domain.tld?CNAME to

Ahem no one reply me. A little fast-rewind: i need to have some 'aliases' to my servers (DM); seems i need to add in smb.conf: netbios aliases = FILESV but also add a 'SPN'; trying to look around for an examples, lead me to ''nothing'', or to examples that seems to me unrelated. Supposing the domain is 'ad.fvg.lnf.it' and the FQDN of the real host is

Hi, Has any one had problems with mail clients were your DNS is like this; doman.com MX 50 mail.domain.com domain.com MX 100 mail2.domain.com domain.com CNAME www.domain.com -aurf

I am currently in the progress of testing the replacement of a Windows 2003 DC with a Samba4-based one. In the DNS of old Windows DC we had CNAME entries to alias www.domain.com to serverX.domain.com and ftp.domain.com to serverY.domain.com. This is working and can be tested successfully with dig The CNAME entries were correctly replicated across to the internal DNS server on the new Samba4 DC

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > OK, NT4-style domains use netbios to find computers. > AD domains use dns Ok, this is clear. > So, my advice would be to use CNAME records in AD. > What Andrew said was correct, but netbios is on the way out, it relies > on SMB1 and the latest Win10 has this turned off by default. Ok, trying to sumarize: if i

Not sure if this is the best place to ask this question (and if so, please point me to a better listserv), but is there anything "wrong" RFC or best practice wise with pointing a CNAME record to a DNS server? (I'm using EveryDNS.net, and I'd like to make my CNAME records ns1-> 4.myDomain.com correspond to ns1->ns4.EveryDNS.net.) -------------- next part -------------- An

Hi, I'm testing: $ sudo nsd-control status version: 4.0.1 verbosity: 2 I found a loop problem with this record: * IN CNAME none ("none" means no matching record in zone and therefore match * again) Queries that use "* CNAME" will result in a loop. The response will use TCP and will be limited to 65k bytes $ dig @127.0.0.1 sdfgsfg.test.com ;; Truncated,

On 27/08/2020 08:49, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/3181029/smb-file-server-share-access-is-unsuccessful-through-dns-cname-alias > @Rowland have a good look at this one. This one is hitting the list.. (i have seen this problem also). I think everyone knows my views on NT4-style domains, they were a good idea at the time, but that time is most

Is this working as designed or a samba bug? I am trying to chown ownership of a file in a samba share and it results in an error. cifstest6:~ # smbclient //cifstest8/smb8 -U root Enter root's password: Domain=[CIFSTEST8] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.4.0-GIT-e6a5f11-devel] smb: \> chown 65534 65534 file2 NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED chown file \file2 uid=65534, gid=65534 The share is thus

Hai, Verify dig -x $(hostname -i) Then dig A $(hostname -f) As long as these match any CNAME should work. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: maandag 11 mei 2020 9:21 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Unable to access shares by server

On 22/05/2020 06:38, Lorenzo Milesi via samba wrote: >> Verify dig -x $(hostname -i) >> Then dig A $(hostname -f) >> >> As long as these match any CNAME should work. > These works, but why these should match a CNAME? hostname returns the "main" host... > > Anyway to make a test I configured a new CNAME > > #?dig server.wdc.mydomain.it > ;; ANSWER

Hi. We migrated a S4 workgroup to S4 AD DC, I'm trying to allow users to access the new \\fileserver with the old host name \\server. I added a CNAME record to the AD DNS zone, created alias for fileserver with samba-tool spn add ldap/SERVER fileserver$ samba-tool spn add HOST/SERVER fileserver$ I also added netbios aliases = server to smb.conf but this should be useless, as

Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I dont get what your goal is, sorry.. :-/ And Rowland: > Why do you think you need 'netbios aliases' ? Simply: i was (ab)used to have, in my NT domain, some aliases for my servers, so i can change servers (and move services) but keeping things consistent. Eg, all my printers are connected to

Hi All, I'm using samba 4.0.0alpha21-GIT-UNKNOWN provisioned to use the internal dns server. I'm having a bit of trouble adding a CNAME entry, or more correctly, getting it to resolve after adding. Prior to adding the CNAME a query returns (the relevant record); Name=centos, Records=1, Children=0 A: 192.168.1.11 (flags=f0, serial=2, ttl=900) It's more than likely me doing

Hi Rowland, I refer again after a week, perhaps missing an important piece to the big picture: the error message appears ONLY when you access the share using the netbios alias: [Global] workgroup = WG1 realm = DOM.CORP netbios name = fs-a netbios aliases = oldsamba security = ADS if you access the \\fs-a\sharename is ok if you access \\oldsamba\sharename the logs report the