similar to: Volume Activation with Samba AD

Hello, what I meant is not acting as a KMS server but something new Microsoft introduced. In windows 10 the tool vor managing Volume Licences asks if you have a KMS server or if you want to use AD for activating the software. I haven't tried it yet as I would need to setup a test environment. So I asked here to see if somebody tried it before. I can test this with samba but I don't have a

Ok here is the output: If the output of the other DCs is needed let me know. On the other DCs there are kcc connections for all other DCs. Just not on dc1. [root at dc1 ~]# samba-tool drs showrepl Default-First-Site-Name\DC1 DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 1781607c-77e8-405d-8c3a-b7e142dd30c4 DSA invocationId: dc096a8a-773d-4a63-8e2a-288ab747557b ==== INBOUND NEIGHBORS ====

Thanks, Can you post the output of : samba-tool drs showrepl -d0 If needed anonimize or send it direct to me. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Christian Naumer via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 10 mei 2017 11:55 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Kcc connection >

Hello Andrew, > I'm also interested in working with someone who is willing to set up a > reproduction (perhaps testing with windows AD) and feed me logs etc. I could do that. Are you planning on implementing a KMS server in Samba similiar to kmspico[1]? [1] https://www.officialkmspico.com/ Cheers, Thomas

Hello all, we have upgraded our 4 DCs from samba 4.4.12 to 4.6.3. The setup is working fine and no errors were displayed during the upgrade. After a day I noticed that the DC (dc1) holding the fsmo roles is missing one kcc connection (to dc3) in the output of samba-tool drs showrpl. Otherwise there are no errors displayed. On windows in the ADSites tool I see that the connection is missing and I

Hello Christian, Ive had a quick look at you output, that looks pretty normal. I'll have a good look Friday, tomorrow day off. So my suggestion is post the output to the list but -d10 is not needed. The regular output should be sufficiant. Im wondering why there is no dc3 in kcc also but why i see over 15 RPC sessions. Maybe normal maybe not, this i dont know. Greetz, Louis >

I saw a nice howto about activation win 7/10 through ad, i’ve not tested it but it may give more options. i’ll look it up tomorrow when im at the office. greetz, Louis > Op 24 jul. 2018 om 19:16 heeft Christian Naumer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> Am 24.07.2018 um 18:34 schrieb Thomas Glanzmann: >> Hello Christian, >>

Hello Christian, Can you post me the message you got from the samba-check-db-repl.sh, Then i'll add something for it. And can you tell with version nummer of the script your using. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Christian Naumer via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 10 mei 2017 9:30 > Aan:

Am 24.07.2018 um 18:34 schrieb Thomas Glanzmann: > Hello Christian, > >> what I meant is not acting as a KMS server but something new Microsoft >> introduced. In windows 10 the tool vor managing Volume Licences asks if >> you have a KMS server or if you want to use AD for activating the >> software. I haven't tried it yet as I would need to setup a test >>

Hello all, as the "profile acls = Yes" option has become deprecated in Samba 4.7 I wanted to ask what the preferred way is of doing this? The Wiki (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roaming_Windows_User_Profiles) still uses "profile acls = Yes" when using posix acls. At the moment our share looks like this: [profiles] profile acls = Yes csc policy = disable

> Am 20.05.2019 um 16:41 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > Hello Cristian, > > Well, nothing to say about your steps, these looks good. > And lmdb could be disable in the sernet packages, cant say, i dont know. > > And only one DC has these problems or all? If only one DC crashed. > Which DC crashes. Last added? Oldest? I

Hello all, I have a weird problem. We have several Windows 10 machines on our Network. All but one run older releases than 1709. We are using roaming profiles on those machines. The share is setup up as to allow different profiles depending on the machine used (see below). The %a is used as a legacy from times where WinXP and Win7 were used in parallel. The path then looks like this:

I don't know if this still works but it does what you want: https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/idmap_nss.8.html Regards Am 13.11.18 um 15:37 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 09:21:14 -0500 > Richard Bollinger <rabollinger at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Prior to 4.8, without winbind in the picture, a windows user named >>

Yes that seems to be working as desired. Thanks much. On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:50 AM Christian Naumer via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I don't know if this still works but it does what you want: > > https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/idmap_nss.8.html > > > Regards > > > Am 13.11.18 um 15:37 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: >

Hello, I think the configuration changed in 4.6. see here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_ad Regards > Am 18.02.2018 um 00:00 schrieb Andrey Repin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > Greetings, All! > > I'm stumbled upon an event I can't understand. Rolled out a new Ubuntu 17.10 > box in preparation for eventual 18.04 launch and… it just

Hello you all, I did some more tests used Samba 4.10.4 and still the same Problem. I also upgraded all the DCs and the problem is the same on all of them. Downgraded all of the an problem is gone. I went up to loglevel 5 an saw nothing that was related. How do I debug further? @rowland: I wrote to bugzilla-maintenance at samba.org to get an bugzilla account but haven't gotten any feedback.

Am 06.12.2017 um 10:14 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 15:39:25 -0700 (MST) > Mariusz80 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Well permisions are working fine but, if i create for example "new >> folder" then the owner is root and what about the main problem with >> mmc. >> > > New files/directories will be

Am 29.04.2018 um 12:35 schrieb Zdravko Zdravkov via samba: > [sssd] >> domains = xxxx >> config_file_version = 2 >> services = nss, pam >> [domain/xxxx] >> ad_domain = xxxx >> krb5_realm = XXXX >> realmd_tags = manages-system joined-with-samba >> cache_credentials = True >> id_provider = ad >> krb5_store_password_if_offline = True

Has anyone found a workaround for Samba print servers? https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/030ee94a-047d-460a-bc39-52351a199364/kb31639 12-breaks-point-and-print-restrictions-gpo-settings If I set the GPOs as stated on the WIKI (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Automatic _Printer_Driver_Downloads_for_Windows_Clients) Windows 10 refuses to install the driver with "a

Hello Cristian, Well, nothing to say about your steps, these looks good. And lmdb could be disable in the sernet packages, cant say, i dont know. And only one DC has these problems or all? If only one DC crashed. Which DC crashes. Last added? Oldest? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Christian