similar to: Another peculiar behaviour, this time with BIND 9 DNS with DLZ

Hi, Let me just check this and revert back. -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava DISCLAIMER: This e-mail communication and any attachments may be privileged and confidential to eXza Technology Consulting & Services, and are intended only for the use of the recipients named above If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of it. If you have

Hello James, Thanks for your quick response. Find attached smb.conf file from DC1 and DC2. Also attached the screen shot of the event viewer from the workstation. At the moment, we have brought down the DC3 and DC4 in another location and observed that DC2 is unable to replicate get the information from DC1 or send the information to DC1. It appears replication is working in background but

Hello, I have implemented Samba as Active Directory Domain Controller with Version 4.6.3 on CentOS 7.3, el-514. We have 4 domain controllers named as DC1, DC2, DC3 and DC4. DC1 & 2 are in one location and DC3 & 4 are in a different location. DNS is SAMBA INTERNAL. All 4 servers are properly synchronizing and even GPO updates are working properly with rsync process. However, off late

Hello James, Thanks for your suggestion. When we had two servers in the pool, we were pushing GPO using rsync from PDC at every 30 minutes. However when we added the two more domain controllers, our rsync script turned to be a pull from PDC every 30 minutes. Would this have made those policy objects inconsistent? We have set up sysvol replication using rsync unidirectional that is a push

Thanks Rowland, I have removed from options, and amended the forwarders. [global] workgroup = <MYDOMAIN> realm = <MYDOMAIN>.CORP netbios name = <HOSTNAME> server role = active directory domain controller idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 ----------> If I remove the portion I get errors -> idmap

On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 22:10:20 +0530 Anantha Raghava via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Rowland > > Samba is running on RHEL 8.9 (subscribed edition) Then why are you not asking redhat ? I am not saying I will not try to help you, but I would have thought that redhat would have been your first port of call. > > Domain is ktkbankltd.com and the work group is

Hello Rowland, 1. We always have been using self compiled samba not the binaries. In fact, when we started we started on CentOS and then when CentOS became an upstream edition, we moved to RHEL, but continued with self compiled samba, never moved to prebuilt binaries. 2. SSSD - We are not using sssd anywhere. We have many Linux Servers but those are not members of AD domain. Only the web

Hi, In samba logs I see these entries. {"timestamp": "2024-03-22T17:00:13.553400+0530", "type": "Authentication", "Authentication": {"version": {"major": 1, "minor": 2}, "eventId": 4624, "logonId": "d42e868adc3300ef", "logonType": 3, "status":

Hello All, I hope you can assist me, I'm running Bind DLZ with our Samba AD DC environment Bind: BIND 9.11.4-P2-RedHat-9.11.4-9.P2.el7 (Extended Support Version) Samba: Version 4.11.6-SerNet-RedHat-9.el7 OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.7 (Maipo) My DNS queries seems to be hanging intermittently, taking anything from 1sec - 15sec or even timing out. I'm been monitoring the

Hello Rowland Samba is running on RHEL 8.9 (subscribed edition) Domain is ktkbankltd.com and the work group is ktkbankltd. This is the AD domain, not reachable from internet. We have 5 servers named pdc.ktkbankltd.com, dc1.ktkbankltd.com, dc2.ktkbankltd.com, dc3.ktkbankltd.com and dc4.ktkbankltd.com The name PDC is just the name, unlike NT4 domain. These servers were initially installed

On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:19:17 -0300 Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I understand, but dont replication between sites, is my problem.... > > Regards; > Lets start by confirming if this is your setup: Matriz site Filail DC1 --------------- DC3 | | | | DC2

Hi, On two of our 4 Domain Controller Servers, the Group Policy Objects have developed some issues. Windows are reporting that Group Policy objects cannot be read. Any recommendation to reset the Group Policy Objects. We are taking daily backup using Samba_Backup script. In the past, there was a recommendation not use "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Can we use it now. By the way

Hi, Again more data: The command samba-tool visualize reps seems to agree with the observed lack of replication from DC4 to DC3 & DC2: > RepsTo objects for DOMAIN > destination >

On Thu, 17 May 2018 17:37:28 -0300 Carlos <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > Matriz site Filial site > DC1 -------(OPENVPN)-------- DC3 > | > | > DC2 > > DC1 -> DC2 = OK > DC1 -> DC3 = OK > > DC2 -> DC1 = OK > DC2 -> DC3 = NO > > DC3 -> DC1 = OK > DC3 -> DC2 =

I dont understand whats the question here. But what i can say about the resolv.conf settings if you have multiple dc's. You have to think in 2 DNS resolving settings. 1) on the server as client resolving ( resolv.conf ) 2) clients resolving ( DNS Services ) The difference explained. If i do : ping hostname this is a server which is doing a client dns request through resolve.conf

So if this is done, is edns configure also ? ? in resolv.conf add: options edns0 ? and, name.conf test these. ? ??????? //?The forwarded zone to the AD-DC DNS use these also. ????????//dnssec-must-be-secure?internal.domain.tld no; ????????//dnssec-must-be-secure 168.192.in-addr.arpa no; ????????// listen-on-v6 { ::1; };? // test what works best, if not all?ipv6 is disabled also?enable this

Hi Rowland, list, On 20-6-2016 20:04, Rowland penny wrote: > If you are using Sernet 4.4.4 packages, you must have a Sernet > subscription, you may get quicker help there. Well I'm not sure this kind of support is included, but even if it were, then others would not benefit from the dialogue with their support. :-) > I was wrong, if you are using 4.2.0 or later, you do not need to

On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 21:07:52 +0530 Anantha Raghava via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > We have Windows 10, 11, Server 2012R2, 2016, 2019 and 2022 as members > in our network. The issue happens randomly on different machines and > different Windows OS. Find the smb.conf below. > > # Global parameters [global] netbios name = PDC realm = XXXXXLTD.COM

Hi all, We are running a three DC samba AD, using 4.12.8 sernet packages. Very stable for years. Today at 12:30 my colleague moved two users from * CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com to * OU=disabled,DC=samba,DC=company,DC=com This change was done on the DC4 at 12:30 using LAM (ldap-account-manager version 7.3) Ever since that, my automated samba-tool ldapcmp scripts started reporting

Hi, I created the model below, which returns me the following warning message: In sem.default(ram = ram, S = S, N = N, param.names = pars, var.names = vars, : Could not compute QR decomposition of Hessian. Optimization probably did not converge. ######### Model ######## mDPDF = data.frame(mj1,mj2,mj3,mj4,mj5,eL1,eL2,eL3,eL4,eL5,aC1,aC2,aC3,aC4,disR1,disR2,disR3,disR4,disR5,