similar to: ACL - samba vs filesystem

On 19/07/18 10:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:32:04 +0100 > lejeczek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> hi guys >> >> my samba share has >> >> inherit acls = Yes >> >> and inherits(I guess) from global: >> >> create mask = 0744 >> directory mask = 0755 >> >> Now,

On 19/07/18 12:17, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:46:43 +0100 > lejeczek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 19/07/18 10:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:32:04 +0100 >>> lejeczek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> hi guys >>>>

On 19/07/18 10:32, lejeczek via samba wrote: > hi guys > > my samba share has > > inherit acls = Yes > > and inherits(I guess) from global: > > create mask = 0744 > directory mask = 0755 > > Now, share's underlying filesystem has acls set on a folder: > > user::rwx > user:me:rwx > user:appmgr:r-x > group::--- > mask::rwx > other::---

On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 11:46:43 +0100 lejeczek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 19/07/18 10:58, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018 10:32:04 +0100 > > lejeczek via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> hi guys > >> > >> my samba share has > >> > >> inherit acls = Yes >

Hi, First, thanks for all people that continuously giving great advice on this list! I am setting up a standalone server (Debian 10, Samba 4.9.5+dfsg-5 from Debian). The following directory is shared and contains two directories: /home/eleve/partage/ ??? Documents ??? Travail I want user "eleve" to be able to modify everything, and guest users to have read access on

On 09/06/18 13:13, Phil Perry wrote: > On 08/06/18 22:54, lejeczek wrote: >> >> >> On 08/06/18 19:38, Phil Perry wrote: >>> On 08/06/18 15:54, lejeczek wrote: >>>> hi >>>> >>>> how do you pass vars to rpmbuild for definition? eg >>>> >>>> rpmbuild --define \'"${_definition2}"\'

dear all trivial kind of question for which I do apologize, but it's sort of puzzling in a share when a windows client creates something samba sets it as 755, yet another user can still delete, in this case a folder which part of configuration fixes it so it would behave as expected? what I have by default is: acl check permissions = Yes acl group control = No acl

Hi Vincent, have you found a solution that makes "force directory mode = 2770" able to apply to new created folders ? I have a similar problem: if I set by hand (eg. chmod 2770) the folder A and then I try to create an X element into that folder through samba I get the result needed ( group of X become overriden from parent folder A ) but the problem is that the new element X not

thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management using groups the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a

Hello, I am testing the ACL support on AIX, and I have some results I do not understand. Config : AIX 5.2, samba 3.0.2a, compiled with gcc 2.9 and --with-acl-support. I create a share test : [test] path = /usr/tests/testpartage read only = No inherit permissions = Yes inherit acls = YesOn Unix side, I put the ACLs :attributes:base permissions owner(test): rwx group(testtoto): rwx

When a file is created with samba 3.5.x or 3.6.x, it is created effective read-only: ~ # getfacl Microsoft\ Word-Dokument\ \(neu\).docx # file: Microsoft\040Word-Dokument\040(neu).docx # owner: root # group: 11816 user::rwx user:11582:rwx #effective:r-- group::rwx #effective:r-- mask::r-- other::--- The ACL-settings for the parent directory are ok: ~ # getfacl . #

Hi all, I have a Samba share set up using POSIX ACLs as the permissions backend. I am seeing an issue where files created via the Samba get execute permissions whereas files created via shell do not. Here’s my demonstration using “share2” as the root of my share: [root at samba srv]# ls -l total 0 drwxrwx---+ 2 root root 65 Dec 17 18:40 share2 [root at samba srv]# getfacl share2/ # file:

On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >>>> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact

I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and inheritance on the shares as it's been constantly causing issues. This server is both a file server and a AD DC. The current problem I am facing is the permissions of the

After installing 2005&2008 C++ , msxml 6, xmlparser I am getting an error box when running the App "Microsoft Visual C++ Runtime Library" "R6034 An Application has made an attempt to load the C runtime library incorrectly" from term I get [/code]ncts at ncts:~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/NEC/SV8100 AU PCPro$ wine AppMgr.exe fixme:actctx:parse_depend_manifests Could not

Hello, I'm using samba 3.0.2(acl) and kernel 2.4.24+acl, libacl-2.2.23. Following problem: When I create a file in an directory with extended ACLs, samba applies the "create mask" in a wrong way (IMHO). The normal behaviour of tools like chmod is that the second (middle) permission field is mapped to the "mask" ACE if the file has an extended ACL, so that the change

A bit of a minor off-topic issue, but on the off-chance that someone understands how ACLs work ... I've been trying to see if using default ACLs would help with the following issue: I have a third party application that is running as a non-root user ('user-a') and creating log files with mode 0600 (read/write only to the owner) in a log directory I have another application that

On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba

Hi list, For testing purpose, I am running a standalone Samba 4.9.5 on Debian with the following smb.conf: [global] server role = standalone server map to guest = Bad User guest account = nobody [test] path = /home/yvan/Partage/share guest ok = yes writable = yes inherit acls = yes I want "bob", "alice" and guest user to have full access to all files in this share, so I

Hello, Really stumped on this issue. I have samba 4.4.7 running on a new server. Users cannot write to files to which they have write permissions via group. Example: Here's the local filesystem on the samba server. I'm logged in as jmalone : jmalone at canis; cd /home/www.nrao.edu/content/logs/ : jmalone at canis; ls -l total 4 -rw-rw-r-- 1 jmalone nraoweb 0 Nov 10 10:02