Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Samba 4.3.11 accessing disk every minute"
2005 Mar 26
1
test65 "deliver" LDA bug
Hello.
I've tried to implement dovecot's deliver LDA to my home mailserver.
I've run into troubles :)
dovecot-deliver.conf:
-- snip --
mail = maildir:%h/Maildir:INBOX=maildir:%h/Maildir
mbox_read_locks = flock
mbox_write_locks = flock
-- snip --
when i run:
deliver -d bfg < email.txt dovecot delivers message to ~/Maildir/maildir/new
It acctually creates "maildir"
2008 May 20
1
The specified network name is no longer available 3.0.25 RHEL4
I have a reproducible intermittent error large site - "The specified network name is no longer available".
This happens when copying large files. Below is part of log level 10 output & strace. Sorry for the long posting. I will probably need to put the loglevel 10 attached to a bugzilla - but thought I would try the lists initially.
RHEL4
samba-3.0.25b-1.el4_6.4
2002 Jul 02
1
Major samba load caused by re-reading of the configuration file
We're running samba-2.2.3a-6 from the redhat 7.3 distribution.
Periodically we see a massive load on our server which then quickly goes
away. I've spent some time trying to diagnose where the problem is and
it appears to be caused by every smb process on the machine (all 360 of
them) re-reading the config file at the same moment.
THe problem is I cannot see why this should happen and
2008 Oct 23
3
high cpu load
I think I have narrowed down the problem why smbd processes are soaking
up so much CPU on our file server. Here are some selected samples from
strace output as I attached to the offending smbd process:
Culprit #1
I took three sample snapshots, each lasted for several seconds, and I
took them
minutes apart from each other. I noticed many lines involved stat'ing
the
a single file in the
2009 Sep 07
1
high imap load on large folders
Hello,
i sync with imapsync from an archiopteryx-server to an dovecot-server, for
testing until now.
The dovecot is inside an VM. storage for mail is on an nfs-share, indexes
are local.
What i now see, is, on large folder( 58000 messages and more) the load
on the imap-process
is very high, and slowdown the transferprocess.
Is there something, I can do. Whats cause the high load ind the
2006 Apr 17
1
Smbd using too much CPU
I recently got the problem that my smbd process takes up a lot of CPU (about
60%). It's running this high even if I don't access the server through my
samba clients. I have tried restarting samba, rebooting the computer and I
have been looking at several logs but I can't see what's wrong. It never
seems to relax. I need to fix this as fast as possible because my CPU fan is
running
2004 Nov 18
0
Samba ADS Winbind unable to join SuSe 9.1
Hi all,
We are trying to add SuSe 9.1 file server to Windows Domain. Here is
our configuration.
Windows 2000 Active Directory
SuSe 9.1 with Samba 3.0.8
When I try to add Linux file server to windows domain using net
command, net command dies with segment fault message. While starting
winbind process, it dies with segment fault error message.
Here is my configuration files
2008 Jan 17
1
convert plugin fails - drops root privileges then tries to create file in /
Hi
I just tried to run the convert plugin as described at
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Convert
(except with mail_location = maildir:~/Mail)
It fails with an error message:
Eopen(/.temp.falcon.endbracket.net.18618.8d5e0a038da6cf06) failed:
Permission denied
Error: imap dump-capability process returned 89
It looks like Dovecot execs /usr/libexec/dovecot/imap, which drops root
privileges
2015 Feb 12
0
Problems in SAMBA 3.3 to 4.0 migration
As promised, I'm posting the smb.conf files for the two servers in question.
One minor correction I should offer is that the new SAMBA server will be
version 4.1, not 4.0.
Following is SMB.CONF for the current PDC, which is Samba 3.3.4 on Slackware
13.
I've omitted all share definitions to allow focus more on the configuration
side. Actual
server/domain names have been omitted.
2015 Feb 12
2
Problems in SAMBA 3.3 to 4.0 migration
On 12/02/15 02:43, soonerdave wrote:
> As promised, I'm posting the smb.conf files for the two servers in question.
>
> One minor correction I should offer is that the new SAMBA server will be
> version 4.1, not 4.0.
>
> Following is SMB.CONF for the current PDC, which is Samba 3.3.4 on Slackware
> 13.
> I've omitted all share definitions to allow focus more on the
2017 May 09
0
samba process use 100% cpu
Anybody?
2017. 05. 02. 10:48 keltezéssel, Papp Bence via samba írta:
> Hi!
>
>
> I need some help.
>
> We use samba4 as AD, and now when clients connect to server, samba
> process stuck at 100% cpu.
>
> samba Version: 4.3.4 Release: 13.el6
>
>
> top:
>
> 3777 root 20 0 131m 46m 28m R 99.7 0.3 219:20.53
> /usr/local/samba4//sbin/samba -D
2017 May 09
0
samba process use 100% cpu
Here is the smb.conf:
https://pastebin.com/LUf4MUF0
Thank you very much.
2017. 05. 09. 18:15 keltezéssel, Dante F. B. Colò via samba írta:
> Did you install it from binary packages ? compiled from source ? Post your smb.conf here.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
> To: "samba" <samba at
2017 May 09
2
samba process use 100% cpu
Did you install it from binary packages ? compiled from source ? Post your smb.conf here.
----- Original Message -----
From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 9, 2017 1:01:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Samba] samba process use 100% cpu
Anybody?
2017. 05. 02. 10:48 keltezéssel, Papp Bence via samba írta:
> Hi!
2017 May 02
2
samba process use 100% cpu
Hi!
I need some help.
We use samba4 as AD, and now when clients connect to server, samba
process stuck at 100% cpu.
samba Version: 4.3.4 Release: 13.el6
top:
3777 root 20 0 131m 46m 28m R 99.7 0.3 219:20.53
/usr/local/samba4//sbin/samba -D
24541 csertam 20 0 49260 11m 9048 S 25.1 0.1 0:01.56 smbd -D
7080 squid 20 0 926m 908m 6428 S 9.9 6.2 11:43.50
2008 Feb 29
1
cram-md5 crashes passdb
Hi all,
When setting auth mechanisms: plain login cram-md5 and only having pam
passdb and passwd userdb. dovecot nevers starts and crashes reporting:
Feb 29 10:19:41 pitux-clust-op1 dovecot: Dovecot v1.0.10 starting up
Feb 29 10:19:41 pitux-clust-op1 dovecot: auth(default): CRAM-MD5
mechanism can't be supported with given passdbs
Feb 29 10:19:41 pitux-clust-op1 dovecot: Auth process died
2002 Sep 25
2
smbd process with high cpu utilization.
One of my smbd processes used 100% cpu. I straced the process and the
output follows:
washington:~# strace -p 3416
fcntl64(13, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_UNLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=404, len=1},
0xbfffefa0) = 0
sendto(12, "\3\0X\r\0\0&\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\'\374\f\0\0\0\0\0\16\0\0\0", 26, 0,
{sin_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(41373),
sin_addr=inet_addr("127.0.0.1")}}, 16) = 26
2004 Oct 21
0
update: samba causing high load
We have experienced some trouble with samba lately. The servers load going
from 5 to 20 causing everything to go very slow, but when I use top to
check which process could be the cause of the trouble nothing uses CPU
cycles. We have about 90% idle CPU usage, but load from 5-20.
When I kill samba (service smb stop) the root-smb process still hangs and
when I kill it (kill -9) the load goes
2015 Apr 23
0
Samba 4 slow write
Hello Ervin,
The in-memory cache lookup could be added back into
samba-4.1.6 by applying the attached patch,
if it could be compiled with Louis how-to steps,
perhaps got the chance to make U14.04 be stayed on samba-4.
Here is my test,
the test-bench is uploading 5000 files and each one is 1MB.
The attached patch could improve 15% at case B).
Case A) Original samba-4.1.6
will go through
2009 Jul 22
3
Newbie: unable to access mailbox more than once
Hello,
I'm using dovecot as a mail relay so that I can back up my providers
IMAP mail locally. I'm impressed how easy this was to set up, but I'm
having a quirk that I would like help with, if possible.
There are many weak links in my set-up chain, if you will, but I think
I've narrowed the problem. I'll describe my set-up anyway. I'm running
dovecot 1.1.4 on ubuntu
2015 Apr 22
0
Samba 4 slow write
Hello Ervin,
?
> Do you mean that this is the "normal" way? These geteuid and
> getegid system calls are so slow?
>
>> ?% time seconds usecs/call calls errors syscall
?>> ?
------ ----------- ----------- --------- --------- ----------------
?>> ?
15.68 15.894980 4 4398791 getegid
>> 15.57 15.783699 4