similar to: Active directory sites & subnets

Thanks for the answer ligpanda101!! For DC's that are not present on a subnet, assign the subnet to the closet > site to a DC Visibly via RSAT, how would that look? On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:06 PM lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/27/2018 11:44 AM, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Reading about, specifically in the wiki

On 6/28/2018 9:20 AM, Elias Pereira wrote: > Thanks for the answer ligpanda101!! > > For DC's that are not present on a subnet, assign the subnet to > the closet site to a DC > > > Visibly via RSAT, how would that look? > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:06 PM lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com > <mailto:lingpanda101 at gmail.com>> wrote: >

hello folks, About ad sites, would work on an infrastructure as shown in the link image below? https://i.imgur.com/tYoxaYi.png The subnets (public IP) for communication is different on each others, of course. :D -- Elias Pereira

Thanks for the link Rowland! I read some of the old topics on the list, regarding trust relationship between two different domains and said that samba could not support. I think it was 2011 topics. Today, with so many updates, is it already supported? On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:43 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2018 23:20:58 -0300 >

Hello, I published a new documentation about how to setup sites and subnets in Active Directory: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Active_Directory_Sites Regards, Marc

Sorry Rowland, I'll leave this topic with the discussion about "sites". I'll create another one for the discussion of "trusts". By article of the link and other searches, based on the infrastructure of my image, it would not be possible to configure sites, as they all need to be in the same domain, correct? On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 4:30 AM, Rowland Penny via samba <

We had a samba 4.1.9 AD DC running since July. We have 3 campuses and brought up a secondary AD at another campus. This setup seemed to be running as expected. We could see our primary AD DC authenticating requests fine. We could see the secondary AD authenticating requests as well at our second campus. Then we started experiencing bandwidth issues between our campuses. Our metro-etherlink

Hi, Existing Samba setup has no sites, two servers (one AD and one DC) are all in Default-First-Site-Name site. Inter-Site Transport: IP Site Link: DEFAULTIPSITELINK Sites: Default-First-Site-Name (already existing): Domain Controller(s): AD, HKDC Subnets: 192.168.1.0/24 SZOffice (new created): Domain Controller:

Hello list, I tried to set up a folder on our fileserver domain member, so I can deploy software for users' machines, but is not working. If I put the software inside "netlogon" it installs correctly. \\172.16.1.7\storage\programs Auth Users - read & execute, list folder contents, read and write Do I need other permissions? -- Elias Pereira

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

Which GPO? Computer or User Configuration? Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it should run as the context of the user, meaning the Everyone permission

hello guys, In my tests lab did the migration ldap base of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADCD. It's possible to migrate directories and files from users of the old samba3 to Samba4 ADDC? -- Elias Pereira

Hello Morillo, I have reviewed the steps described again. In fact, I had already done this several times. :D Even so, it does not map. The shared folder is mapped, but the printer is not. On windows 7 it works correctly. On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:33 PM MORILLO Jordi via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello Elias, > > Printing is working well for us. > Carrefully

Hello David, Am 30.12.2014 um 00:26 schrieb David Bear: > The big question is could the sites and services tool have triggered some > bug in samba ? So much time has elapse I don't see that it is possible to > go back and trouble shoot that way we should. > > I'm just wondering if there are any known issues with sites and services -- > or possible issues that could have

On 12/30/2014 10:55 AM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello David, > > Am 30.12.2014 um 00:26 schrieb David Bear: >> The big question is could the sites and services tool have triggered some >> bug in samba ? So much time has elapse I don't see that it is possible to >> go back and trouble shoot that way we should. >> >> I'm just wondering if there are any

On 22/12/14 17:47, Elias Pereira wrote: > And now, I run the command "samba-tool user list" and the result is as > follows: > > *# samba-tool user list* > *ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb* > *Could not find machine account in secrets database: Failed to fetch > machine account password from secrets.ldb: Could not find entry to match > filter:

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

> > Simple answer: > Administrator, No > Domain Admins, Yes Ok. It was already that way. root at fileserver:/etc/samba# getent group ... domain admins:x:10004: domain users:x:10000: dap:x:10003: dti:x:10001: For some reason with the administrator user is not working, I put my user as domain admin and include him as a member of unix and now I can access the security tab.

The saga continues... I've spent a whole day with log level 5 and 7 and no error. All I have to do is return the log to the default and the error reappears. I monitored the "LDAP Query: Duration", but I didn't notice any crashes in the queries. I don't know if it's a long time, but some queries took 1.5s. Is there anything else I can do? On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at

Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another