similar to: Samba 4 wiki update

2015-11-27 16:43 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 27/11/15 15:24, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> >> >> 2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com >> <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>>: >> >> >> On 27/11/15 14:30, James wrote: >> >> On

On 11/27/2015 10:43 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/11/15 15:24, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >> >> 2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny >> <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>>: >> >> On 27/11/15 14:30, James wrote: >> >> On 11/27/2015 9:16 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> >>

On 27/11/15 18:03, James wrote: > On 11/27/2015 10:43 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 27/11/15 15:24, mathias dufresne wrote: >>> >>> >>> 2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny >>> <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>>: >>> >>> On 27/11/15 14:30, James wrote: >>>

On 02/12/15 09:28, mathias dufresne wrote: > 2015-11-27 16:43 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > >> On 27/11/15 15:24, mathias dufresne wrote: >> >>> >>> 2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com >>> <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>>: >>> >>>

On 27/11/15 15:24, mathias dufresne wrote: > > > 2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > <mailto:rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>>: > > On 27/11/15 14:30, James wrote: > > On 11/27/2015 9:16 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On 27/11/15 13:23, James wrote: > > On 11/26/2015 11:12

2016-04-05 15:46 GMT+02:00 L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl>: > Ok Mathias.. > > I hoop this helps a bit. > https://technet.microsoft.com/nl-nl/library/cc816941(v=ws.10).aspx > > now type : > nslookup -type=soa internal.domain.tld > or > nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld > and look at > nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld

Ok Mathias.. I hoop this helps a bit. https://technet.microsoft.com/nl-nl/library/cc816941(v=ws.10).aspx now type : nslookup -type=soa internal.domain.tld or nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld and look at nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld ip_of_a_NS1-server. nslookup -debug -type=soa internal.domain.tld ip_of_a_NS2-server. And see.. The soa record contains only

Back from another test: rather than build new DCs, join them and use one of them to seize FSMO roles, I just seize FSMO with one of my current DCs. Once more the SOA was not updated, which seems to mean there is a real issue about that as seizing these roles has chances to precede removal of old FSMO owner. To update SOA record using samba-tool: 1) If not created, create a NS record for the DC

2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > On 27/11/15 14:30, James wrote: > >> On 11/27/2015 9:16 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: >> >>> On 27/11/15 13:23, James wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/26/2015 11:12 AM, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Then you re-run your test with only

2016-02-28 23:42 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net>: > > > Am 28.02.2016 um 23:10 schrieb Rowland penny: > >> On 28/02/16 21:56, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Am 28.02.2016 um 22:22 schrieb John Gardeniers: >>> >>>> Thanks Rowland. Perhaps because I expected these basic issues to have

Something important I forget in my last mail is the person I mentioned has configured is samba with "allow dns updates = nonsecure" for nsupdate works. 2015-11-27 16:24 GMT+01:00 mathias dufresne <infractory at gmail.com>: > > > 2015-11-27 15:49 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com>: > >> On 27/11/15 14:30, James wrote: >>

On 28/02/16 22:42, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 28.02.2016 um 23:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 28/02/16 21:56, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 28.02.2016 um 22:22 schrieb John Gardeniers: >>>> Thanks Rowland. Perhaps because I expected these basic issues to have >>>> been resolved long ago I never thought to check the SOA

On 05/03/16 04:54, Allen Chen wrote: > On 2/29/2016 4:10 AM, Rowland penny wrote: >> On 28/02/16 23:05, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 28.02.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> On 28/02/16 22:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 28.02.2016 um 23:10 schrieb Rowland penny:

Hai, If you just upgrade / changed the samba servers, then most probily replication is in progress.. Depanding on the numbers of objects this can take some time, so dont be to quick with checking. So take some time and wait... get koffie (maybe beer) ;-) Get this script , if needed change it and run it https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/samba-check-db-repl.sh it check up to 10 domain

Hi, I have two problems with my 2 Samba AD-DC. I don't know if the two problems are related. Both domain controllers show the same error pattern for problem 1.The second problem only occurs with the second domain controller. The domain itself seems to work and be in order. Does someone know where this comes from and how to solve it? ## Issue 1 ## By doing my random log checking, I saw the

So you have 2 DC using BIND9_DLZ as dns backend, they both answer DNS from clients. Am I right? If yes, how are configured your client DNS resolvers? Resolver on clients should be aiming one of your DC (or the two of them in case of DC downtime). NOTE: "should" only because you could make clients using your company DNS servers as resolvers if these DNS servers knows how to forward

Am 28.02.2016 um 23:54 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 28/02/16 22:42, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 28.02.2016 um 23:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 28/02/16 21:56, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 28.02.2016 um 22:22 schrieb John Gardeniers: >>>>> Thanks Rowland. Perhaps because I expected these basic issues

> No need to build Samba yourself, you can find packages here: > > http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/ How can I install these files? Here are the requested files from both servers. ## DC01 ## /etc/hostname 01-dc01 ----- /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost #127.0.1.1 01-dc01 # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts ::1 ip6-localhost ip6-loopback fe00::0

On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 17:05:25 +0200 Ronny Preiss via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have two problems with my 2 Samba AD-DC. I don't know if the two > problems are related. > Both domain controllers show the same error pattern for problem 1.The > second problem only occurs with the second domain controller. > The domain itself seems to work and

For me: - SOA means where updates can be sent. - SOA can be one or several. - NS is a record to help non-authoritative name servers to find a valid name server for the zone they receive a request and they don't know anything about that zone. - SOA is often declared as NS, I agree. I explained this is not mandatory. There is no link between these two notions except they share a zone. You are