similar to: weird messages in logs

Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 20:17:12 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > Only change I made before installing Samba, was to comment the > '127.0.1.1' line in /etc/hosts Tried again with your smb.conf and minimal changes, and it gets worse: [2017/02/20 14:42:19.048133, 0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report)

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > OK, but getent and id return with error (id: no such user, getent: > return code 2). On the systems I've previously set up similarly > (Wheezy/Samba 3.6), id and getent work. > Is this before or after you tried my proposed smb.conf ? > > > > > > I've found

Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:10:36 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > idmap config *:backend = tdb > idmap config *:range = 2000-9999 > idmap config SAMDOM : backend = rid > idmap config SAMDOM : range = 10000-999999 > You mean TESTAD instead of SAMDOM, don't you? --

Le Fri, 25 May 2018 16:55:04 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > > I don't understand either (or find in the documentation) how to > > disable these usershares. Any help and explanation appreciated. > > > > If you must use such an old EOL version of Samba, try what it says in > that Debian bugreport. A better

I've got a Debian/Jessie Samba 4.2.14 running as an AD member. ADC is a Windows2008R2 server. Join worked without problem. # net ads testjoin Join is OK wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g work perfectly and provides a list of users and groups from the AD as expected. wbinfo -i <user> works too: # wbinfo -i TESTAD\\testuser

On Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:51:42 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > Thank you for reporting this back. Very welkom and good to heard you > fixed it. > > > It would be interesting to know which parameters absolutely > > kill performance this way! > > Yes, that would be great to know which parameters

Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest > version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages. > > Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released > every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant. > >

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:31:16 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:03:33 +0000 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:41:06 +0100 > > Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, but getent and id return with

Actually it isn't part of AD at all. We are using FreeIPA and Samba. We just finally figured this out with the help of some folks at Red Hat. It turned out there was a bug in one of the libraries that came along with sssd (sssd-libwbclient I believe). Their suggestion to use winbind and the version of the same library that came with it seems to have solved our problem instantly. It

Our fileserver (running RHEL 7.4) has suddenly stopped allowing access to network shares through Samba. It is running Samba 4.6.2. When someone tries to mount a shared folder it prompts them for a username and password which fails even when the password is correct, rather than using their valid Kerberos ticket as it has in the past. Anyone here has a similar experience or suggestions as to

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:50:52 +0100 Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Le Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:20:52 +0100 > Emmanuel Florac via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > > > I've added > > idmap config * : backend = tdb > idmap config * : range = 10000-30000 > > to smb.conf, and now 'wbinfo -i

Le Mon, 28 Aug 2017 16:45:16 +0200 Reindl Harald via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > Am 28.08.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > These are your non-default lines: > > > > server signing = mandatory > > and i bet that one has the major performance impact > __________________________ > > quote from microsoft: >

Le Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:46:12 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > 4.2.x is EOL as far as Samba is concerned, there have been a lot of > changes since 4.2.* came out. > > Can I suggest you go here: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ > > You can get a much more recent version there, 4.6.7 OK I'll try it, but that doesn't really explain why

> Manpage says that 'usershare max shares' is just at '0' as default, but > i'll give it a try and report back. OK, seems to work, log error desappeared. I can fire up bug for the manpage?! -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66 Associazione ``La Nostra Famiglia'' http://www.lanostrafamiglia.it/ Polo FVG - Via della Bontà, 7

Hi everyone, we plan on setting up a Samba 4.x based AD. We have a couple of ancient to old systems running samba 3.0.24 to 3.5.7 and 3.6.24. Is there any problem to integrate those old systems as member of a Samba 4-driven AD? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique

Hai, Ok, so you have 3 the same machines and only one is slow. Thats important info. Did anything special happen with this server. For example 2 servers got a new install and this one had an upgrade (or sort of upgrade) from the "old" server? Or you configured the new server in an other (ad site) and moved it to the new location. In tring to figure out, where what happend, so we

On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 09:11 -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:52:29PM -0300, Dante Colo via samba wrote: > > Hi Everyone ! > > > > I note that all of samba AD server that i maintain are not so fast in terms of data transfer, more specifically none of them go over 40 MB/s , one particularly which i'm trying to find out why doesn't go

On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 23:28:08 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I HATE these auto send keys.. Did i tell that already.. > ( see below ) > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: L.P.H. van Belle [mailto:belle at bazuin.nl] > > Verzonden: woensdag 16 augustus 2017 23:22 > > Aan: 'samba at

Hello, I have an old 3.6 server to be replaced with a new 4.9 one. They are standalone, using tdbsam backend. I copied system users and group, then /var/lib/samba/*.tdb from the old to the new one. However, obviously the newer samba absolutely doesn't care about my old user database. "pdbedit -L" returns nothing on the new server. Is there some upgrade step I'm missing here?

On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 18:13:39 +0100 Emmanuel Florac <eflorac at intellique.com> wrote: > > Both, alas. I'll retry by entering everything as you proposed instead > of editing the existing file. Please do, it should work > Here: >