similar to: IRPC callback failed for DsReplicaSync - NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND

On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:33:19 +0000 Paul Littlefield via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I am changing 2 x Gentoo/Samba 4.1 AD DCs for 2 x Ubuntu/Samba 4.7 AD > DCs. > > I have joined the 2 new DCs and transferred the role to #3. > > I am performing sysvol replication from #3 to #4 quite happily with > no errors. > > I have left them

Hello everyone. After all the problems I had demoting my DC and managed it to work again, it was working for only a week. Now i am getting this messages on the log: [2014/07/22 16:13:11.745783, 0] .../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 at

Hello there, I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 and dc2. Distribution: Debian 8.5 Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH". Because the message "BAD_NETPATH" I checked the DNS-resolution:

Am 23.08.2016 um 15:36 wrote Heinz Allerberger via samba: > Hello there, > > I have a problem with replication between two domain controllers, dc1 > and dc2. > Distribution: Debian 8.5 > Samba-Distribution: sernet-samba 4.3.11-14 > > The replication on dc2 working fine without any failures. > But the synchronization on dc1 gives the failure "WERR_BAD_NETPATH".

Hi everyone, Samba4 has been going great for quite a while now, so I thought I would get a little adventurous. The goal is to install Openchange with SOGo. The SOGo part is fine, but Openchange extends the AD schema in a similar way that Exchange extends the AD schema. To facilitate this, I joined a new DC to the domain, and transferred the fsmo schema role to this new DC. When I say

On 1/2/2018 4:05 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:52:57 -0500 > lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 1/2/2018 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:23:18 -0500 >>> lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Actually it looks as if Bind isn't running.

Hello samba team, Ive Samba 4.19.1 join to Windows 2022 AD the replication works only from Windowd DC to Samba DC but not in the other direction. DC1: windows server 2022 , schema version 69 DC2: Samba version 4.19.1, schema version 69 Domain and forest functional level in 2008_R2 (two environments) When i check the replication status from Samba the error is: [.................] [root at

I had a AD with 4 Win2003 DC. Now I use a samba4 server as a additional DC. Samba4 server system version: ubuntu 15.04 Samba version: samba 4.3.0 The replication from win2003 DC to samba4 DC was success. But have some problem from samba4 DC to win2003 DC. I can run "samba-tool drs showrepl" without error. But in log.samba it can found many message like: [2015/10/09 12:53:11.562088, 0]

On 1/2/2018 3:37 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:23:18 -0500 > lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Actually it looks as if Bind isn't running. Though I could've sworn >> it did at one point. >> >> service bind9 restart >>  * Stopping domain name service... bind9 >>               rndc: connect

Good afternoon, I have an environment with 4 servers samba 4 and yesterday one of them died, I tried removing it and not found, then recreated the server with the same name and joined him as a DC, however, he created a new uuid and sync entres servers I stopped, I had to force a forced sync: # samba-tool drs replicate samba02 samba01 DC=example,DC=com,DC=br # samba-tool drs replicate samba03

I've been grappling with a recurring set of errors for quite some time now: - UpdateRefs failed with NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT - Failed samba_kcc - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT - IRPC callback failed for DsReplicaSync - NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT Despite cranking up the log level to 10, the returned information remains frustratingly cryptic and hard to decipher. This error, being overly generic, continues to

Hello Andrew, 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but when it is at the default log level, it does? Another point I've noticed before is that when I run the command "samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --reset-well-known-acls --fix --yes" (*Checked 15337 objects (0 errors)*), and in another

On 31/05/18 18:44, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > So there is also an easier option in the long term. Plus we will make > the online demote clean up the extra records. That would be great, because I've just cleaned up about 40 entries using the Windows DNS Manager gui tool! I also learnt a lot about adding extra NS and PTR records using this gui tool (mydomain.com and

On 03/02/2020 18:49, Kris Lou via samba wrote: > > From windows: > echo %logonserver% \\DC3 > nltest /dsgetdc:<domain> DC:\\DC3 Address: \\192.168.0.218 Dom Guid: bla bla bla ... The command completed successfully. > From a *nix domain member (i.e. client, not DC): > wbinfo --getdcname=<domain> > winbind --ping-dc wbinfo --getdcname=MYDOMAIN DC3 wbinfo

Hello, I am running in a duplicate test environment of my work domain. I have 2 x 4.1 DCs and 2 x 4.7 DCs. I have transferred FSMO role to #3 and it is replicating to #4 fine. I have demoted #1 which appeared to go fine and have turned it off. When I try to demote #2 it fails with the error... Using dc3.domain.com as partner server for the demotion Password for [DOMAIN\administrator]:

On Thu, 2024-04-11 at 14:21 -0300, Elias Pereira wrote: > Hello?Andrew, > > 1. What is the explanation for the fact that when the log level is > set to 5 or 7, the NT_STATUS_IO_TIMEOUT error does not appear, but > when it is at the default log level, it does? I don't have an explanation for this, sorry. ?Have you looked into the 1.5 second queries, what is sending them and

Either the local server is busy, or possibly (but it would not explain the samba_kcc) Samba's drepl process is stuck talking to a remote server. Is the drepl local processes very busy doing inbound replication? My instinct is either the server is very busy (and this should show up in CPU use) or a transaction is being held open excessively. Andrew Bartlett On Sat, 2024-03-09 at 19:11 -0300,

Hi llvm users & developers! Attached patches: 1) rewrite previous patch, now for darwin platform applied old mechanism 2) patch added processing .rept directive 3) patch added processing .irp directive 4) patch added processing .irpc directive -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello List, I have successfully migrated my DCs to 4.7.6-Ubuntu However, I still have some traces of the old DCs in the DNS... $ samba-tool dns query dc3 mydomain.com @ ALL Name=, Records=8, Children=0 SOA: serial=570, refresh=900, retry=600, expire=86400, minttl=0, ns=dc3.mydomain.com. NS: samba.mydomain.com. (flags=600000f0, serial=110, ttl=900) NS: dc3.mydomain.com.

Hello Samba experts, due to the "SambaCry" issue (CVE-2017-7494), I am trying to update the Samba server installation on my Thecus NAS (dating back to 2011) from version 3.5.16 to the current 4.6.4. So far, I have successfully * created a cross-compiling toolchain for the NAS (i686-nptl-linux-gnu) based on gcc-5.2 * compiled Python and Samba library dependencies for my