similar to: DC won't update Windows 10 PTR records

Hi Barry, > 23-May-2018 13:53:09.094 database: info: samba_dlz: disallowing update > of signer=I7X4-45G-2\$\@TIPPING.LAN name=210.254.168.192.in-addr.arpa > type=PTR error=insufficient access rights could you check if that entry exist or not in the reverse zone, and if it exist what ACE is on that entry (right click/property/security). If the entry exists, you should see the computer

I'm investigating high CPU load on a domain member server (file server) after an upgrade from 4.5.5 to 4.6.2. The problem continued after a subsequent upgrade to 4.6.7. I turned up the log level to 3 for a short time and looked at the logs. One thing I notice is some entries like this: [2018/01/24 18:28:37.933498, 3] ../source3/auth/user_krb5.c:164(get_user_from_kerberos_info)

In Samba 4.1 I get the following output for smbstatus: Samba version 4.1.1 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2482 john Everyone 10.0.0.109 (ipv4:10.0.0.109:49178) 7364 george Everyone 10.0.0.60 (ipv4:10.0.0.60:49232) In Samba 3.6 it was like this: Samba version 3.6.24 PID

Sorry I should have said in my original post, this server is a NT4 style domain server. Looking in /var/log/samba I see log files with the machine names in the file names, so samba definitely knows the machine names. On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Ricky Nance <ricky.nance at gmail.com> wrote: > > Mark, I think (and I may be wrong here, so if a dev sees this correct me) >

Mark, I think (and I may be wrong here, so if a dev sees this correct me) smbstatus works with sockets. With that being said, I don't think it has been updated to work with samba as an AD DC, but should still work fine on other configurations (member server, legacy DC, etc). If you are running with a non ad dc config, let us know, there may be a bug there. Ricky On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 5:12

We recently upgraded Samba on our DC from 4.7.6-0 to 4.11.9-3. Everything seems to be running fine over the last few weeks after the update. I'm now setting up a new computer & am having issues getting it to register with DNS. Windows shows that it has joined the domain. I can see the system in ADUC, but no A record in DNS Manager. I've run ipconfig /registerdns, but the event log

hello everybody! i have a samba (3.0.24) running on a gentoo (alpha) box. i connect to a share using cifs and when i then run df -h, i get the following ahuemer@xeon distfiles % df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 34G 31G 3.3G 91% / udev 759M 2.8M 756M 1% /dev shm 759M 20K 759M 1% /dev/shm

Dear All, My servers running on CentOS 5.5 x86_64 with kernel 2.6.18.194.17.4.el gigabyte motherboard and 2 harddisks (seagate 500GB). My CentOS box configured RAID 1, yesterday and today I had the same problem on 2 servers with same configuration. See the following error messages for details: EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly filesystem. EXT3-fs: write access will be enabled during

Hi, I'm having a problem with my cached userdb information. These are my passdb and userdbs: passdb { driver = ldap args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext } userdb { driver = prefetch } userdb { driver = ldap args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf.ext } In /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf.ext (userdb) I have: user_attrs =

> You are meaning here, literally: windows client try to register/update > DNS using ONLY the dns provided by DHCP? > Or, speaking differently the same thing, windows client suppose blindly > that DNS got by DHCP ARE AD DCs? Ok, DNS registration seems to work, but on a (form me) strange way... Spotted in logs: Jun 8 10:14:25 vdcud1 named[1049]: client 10.5.2.127#50250: request has

(I'm not subscribed to the list: please keep me in CC) I'm copying files between two samba server using robocopy from a third Windows PC and i'm experiencing disk usage that is much higher on the destination PC. The origin samba server is Debian Lenny with samba 3.2.5. The destination samba server is Debian Wheezy with samba 3.6.9 The PC running robocopy is Windows Server 2003 with

On Fri, 8 Jun 2018 12:04:30 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > You are meaning here, literally: windows client try to > > register/update DNS using ONLY the dns provided by DHCP? > > Or, speaking differently the same thing, windows client suppose > > blindly that DNS got by DHCP ARE AD DCs? > > Ok, DNS registration seems

Hai, If the primary domain is set in windows, which is after domain join, it used that. Ipconfig /all and see primary DNS suffix. The dns suffix and first dns search list should be the same. Yes, other settings are possible, but stick to this for now. The Primay DNS suffix is used for the register of the IP in the DNS. The DHCP Service User MUST be a member of the DNSAdmins. The DHCP

Im wondering why your log below shows this order, i just noticed. Why is the computer tring to set the A records 2 x. Lines 1-13, show a successfull commit of the A/AAAA records. ( TSIG key ok ) If you count the below lines, after line 13, my logs shows. samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone 1.168.192.in-addr.arpa Yours is trying again to update samba_dlz: starting transaction on zone

Hi there, I'm Vladimir Olteanu (or just Vlad, for short), and I'm working on the SOCKSv6 protocol. It is being discussed at the IETF (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-olteanu-intarea-socks-6-10). The spec has matured somewhat and is currently undergoing an adoption call at the Intarea WG. I would like to get your opinion on this newer version of the protocol, in particular on how

> Are you sure it worked before ? > > This is my take on your named.conf: > > ??? acl mynetworks { > ??????? 192.168.254.0/24; > ??????? 192.168.252.0/24; > ??????? 192.168.251.0/24; > ??????? 192.168.250.0/24; > ???? }; > > ??? options { > ??????? directory???? "/var/named"; > ??????? notify no; > ??????? empty-zones-enable no; > ???????

On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 07:54:14PM +0900, Matt wrote: > I am trying to make Qemu agent work with libvirt thanks to > https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/pull/922 with libvirt 4.1.0. I've been > trying to make it work for quite some time but I still haven't the > slightest idea of what is wrong, I keep seeing "Guest agent is not > responding: QEMU guest agent is not

I'm working on a shell script to create new users on a AD DC. Currently we use ADUC, but that is slow and error-prone. My (untested) command looks like this: samba-tool user create $USERNAME $PASSWORD \ --nis-domain=sta \ --unix-home=/home/${USERNAME} \ --uid-number=${NEXTID} \ --login-shell=/sbin/nologin \ --gid-number=513 \ --use-username-as-cn \ --home-drive=Z \

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:06:52 -0700 Mark Nienberg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I'm working on a shell script to create new users on a AD DC. > Currently we use ADUC, but that is slow and error-prone. My > (untested) command looks like this: > > samba-tool user create $USERNAME $PASSWORD \ > --nis-domain=sta \ > --unix-home=/home/${USERNAME} \ >

I am trying to make Qemu agent work with libvirt thanks to https://github.com/NixOS/nixops/pull/922 with libvirt 4.1.0. I've been trying to make it work for quite some time but I still haven't the slightest idea of what is wrong, I keep seeing "Guest agent is not responding: QEMU guest agent is not connected" as the program I use (nixops) calls the libvirt python API. I