similar to: Functional Levels

Thanks for answers. Why do you have this option if it is not working yet? Just out of curiosity... Regards; On 22-05-2018 12:52, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2018 12:39:53 -0300 > Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> HI!! >> >> I have one question, in samba 4.8.2 , --forest-level and >> --domain-level is worked

On Tue, 22 May 2018 12:39:53 -0300 Carlos via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > HI!! > > I have one question, in samba 4.8.2 , --forest-level and > --domain-level is worked 2012/2012 R2 ? > > samba-tool domain level --help > > > --forest-level=FOREST_LEVEL >                         The forest function level (2003 | 2008 | > 2008_R2 | 2012 |

Hello Andrew, first let me say it was a pleasure to meet you in G?ttingen at the SambaXP. The discussion about the "DNS" in the evening was very interesting. So, i have asked this question a few weeks before, maybe a entry in the samba wiki would help ;) Regards from Germany Dirk Am 13.06.19 um 18:55 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: > On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 20:48 +0530,

Hi, I am trying to raise the Domain functional level to 2012_R2 from 2008 R2 using samba-too domain raise --domain-level=DOMAIN_LEVEL command. But I am receiving the error "ERROR: Domain function level can't be higher than the lowest function level of a DC!". How do we actually raise the lowest functional level to change the functional & forest level? Samba Version is

Hello, I'm trying to join an Arch Linux server as a DC to an existing domain with functional level Windows Server 2012 (5), but I'm getting the following error: DsAddEntry failed with status (5, 'WERR_ACCESS_DENIED') info (8567, 'WERR_DS_INCOMPATIBLE_VERSION'). Exchange 2013 is also installed on this domain by the way. Part of the output of samba-tool domain level -h is:

Hi! In the samba wiki there's this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels which basically says that the maximum supported functional level is 2008_R2, and that 2012 (and 2012_R2) are included but not supported. This page mentions maximum samba version 4.4 and has been modified in 2017 (besides some formatting changes). What's the current situation? Also,

Hello Andrew, totally backup. There is an entry in the wiki. I have overlook the side ( https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels). My fault, sorry :-[ Regards Dirk Am 13.06.19 um 19:13 schrieb Dirk Streubel via samba: > Hello Andrew, > > first let me say it was a pleasure to meet you in G?ttingen at the SambaXP. > > The

Hai,   Now, differences is fine, but can you see if one of the 2 servers is correct, and for that it might be handy to share the output.   You can push the good DB to the other DC. ( a forced replication )   And i can understand why you upgrade ...  Did you see :    samba-tool domain schemaupgrade --help Usage: samba-tool domain schemaupgrade [options] Domain schema upgrading Options:   -h,

Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise - mainstream support end-date: 1/13/2015 - extended support end-date: 1/14/2020 samba -V Version 4.6.0rc2 samba-tool domain level show ldb_wrap open of secrets.ldb Domain and forest function level for domain 'DC=facility,DC=local' Forest function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Domain function level: (Windows) 2008 R2 Lowest function level of a DC:

Hello, dc3 = principal DC dc4 = secondary DC I had this problem last month after updating samba to version 4.10.x. and also the schema from 45 to 69. But it looked like it had been corrected. Today I noticed that on dc4 there are computers that are not on dc3. I updated: 4.7.x to 4.8.x 4.8.x to 4.9.x and only after that I upgrade to 4.10.x version. When I run these commands: samba-tool

im on phone, had a quick small look at the dc3 output. is your time in sync, it looks like a 3 - 10 min different. gr. Louis Op 7 mei 2019, om 18:34, Elias Pereira <empbilly at gmail.com> schreef: Hello, dc3: http://pasted.co/6b703479 dc4: http://pasted.co/5068fc6e diff: http://pasted.co/025c3242 On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:08 PM L.P.H. van Belle via samba <samba at

https://jimshaver.net/2016/02/14/defending-against-mimikatz/ I guess at least the security is good reason to have 2012 fl -----Original Message----- From: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Marc Muehlfeld via samba Sent: Saturday, February 4, 2017 7:57 PM To: barış tombul <bbtombul at gmail.com>; samba <samba at lists.samba.org> Subject: Re: [Samba] Server

Hi, for now I am using Win2003 functional level of my domain. I just wanted to ask if I raise the level to 2008_R2 will the scheme be extended like this article says? https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd446680%28v=ws.10%29.aspx I just want to know this for the time samba will someday support DC related GPOs. Thanks in advance Tim

Hi! I'm running samba 4.3.11 on Ubuntu server Xenial. It's the only AD-DC in a windows domain that used to be hosted by a single Win2k3 server. The AD schema version is 30, the functionality level is already raised to 2008_R2 (domain) and 2008 (forest). ~# ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -b 'cn=Schema,cn=Configuration,dc=domain,dc=com' -s base objectVersion #

On 12.02.2019 11:16, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 14:28:44 +0500 > Шигапов Денис Вильданович via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I joined the windows 2019 domain, where among the controllers there >> is a Samba DC version 4.8.5, and after that the replica stopped >> working windows servers <--> samba DC. Upgrading to

G'day All, We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2. I am referencing: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was 2003. However, when we try to raise further, we are getting what seems to be a

I joined the windows 2019 domain, where among the controllers there is a Samba DC version 4.8.5, and after that the replica stopped working windows servers <--> samba DC. Upgrading to version 4.9.4 did not help Errors: ``` фев 12 14:15:28 srv-dc01 samba[24637]: [2019/02/12 14:15:28.679872,  0] ../source4/dsdb/repl/replicated_objects.c:248(dsdb_repl_resolve_working_schema) фев 12

Hello , I did it from schema version 31 to 47. You'll have to get the ldf files used by adprep. The files have to be split between updates and adds. There must be also some syntax changes. I can send you the resulting files if you want. You'll also need to manually add some informations in order to be able to join a real windows 2008 R2 controller. Those informations are :

On 02/01/2017 10:58 AM, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > The major issue at this point relates to the schema. Your domain > functional level is a different thing to your server functional level, > so you can keep the domain functional level at 2008R2, which is what > Samba has reasonable support for. As this week I also looked into the functional levels that samba supports, I must

I am planning to upgrade the DCs using the join and promote method. List of DCs ----------- 1) SAMBA1 2) SAMBA2 3) DC1 4) DC2 Currently SAMBA1 is the PDC and SAMBA2 is the "SDC" and are in sync with replication and rsync sysvol. DCs SAMBA1 and SAMBA2 are 4.1 git releases with AD Schema version 47. My plan to get to AD Schema version 69 was... 0. Add entries to the DHCP Server for the