similar to: RSAT Hang

See Inline LPHvBvs> Hi Gregory, LPHvBvs> On the questions. >> Is there a good reason to avoid Samba internal DNS? LPHvBvs> No, imo not, but i only use bind9_dlz because i need bind in my lan for other setups also. LPHvBvs> I just used my RSAT on my win7 64b, but at my point it works fine. LPHvBvs> I do have questions to get a better impression of the setup. LPHvBvs>

RPvs> On Mon, 21 May 2018 17:15:21 -0700 RPvs> Gregory Sloop via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> See Inline >> LPHvBvs> Hi Gregory, >> LPHvBvs> On the questions. >> >> Is there a good reason to avoid Samba internal DNS? >> LPHvBvs> No, imo not, but i only use bind9_dlz because i need bind in >> LPHvBvs> my lan for

Rpvs> On 14/07/2020 17:25, Gregory Sloop via samba wrote: >> Rpvs> On 14/07/2020 16:51, Gregory Sloop via samba wrote: >>>> Yeah, I could setup an extra XCP box - but at smaller setups, it really seems like overkill. >>>> So, it sounds like restores of the VM work "fine." >>>> How often do machine accounts reset their passwords? >>

We have 3 ADCs based on Samba-4.7.4 (compiled from source,internal DNS)/ CentOS7: dcdo1,dcnh1 and dcge1. dcge1 holds all FSMO roles. The 3 ADCs are on different locations connected via IPSec based VPN. No traffic is filtered out. All 3 ADCs replicate fine except dcdo1 -->dcnh1. Symptom: [root at dcdo1 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate dcnh1.ad.kdu.com dcdo1.ad.kdu.com dc=ad,dc=kdu,dc=com

On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 13:00:05 +0100 "Dr. Johannes-Ulrich Menzebach via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > There is additional info in the logs of the source DC (dcdo1, log > level 2, manually triggered another replication): > ==================== > [2017/12/27 12:31:29.695121,  2] >

RPvs> On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:08:31 -0700 RPvs> Gregory Sloop via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> I was under the impression that during provision that the >> Administrator account got all the domain [and other] "root" privs by >> default. If that's the case, why doesn't Administrator have the privs >> we'd expect? [Perhaps I

Hi, i have the same problem on samba 4.7.3 and 4.7.4. I start with 2 DCs and the sync works fine. After the join of a third DC mostly i get the WERR_DS_DRA_ACCESS_DENIED. I tested it for 10 times. in my case i have: DC1 (with any FSMO Roles) DC2 new join as DC: DC3 After the join, the sync from DC2 to DC3 fails. samba-tool drs replicate dc2 dc1 dc=gvcc,dc=net : OK samba-tool drs replicate

Hi, there is no firewall, all DCs are in the same subnet. here ist the output of a test, you can see, the CNAME guid entries in the _msdcs can be resolved on any DC: (DC1 and DC2 are the first and second DCs, SAMBA3 was added at last. ldbsearch -H /srv/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationId=*)' --cross-ncs objectguid # record 1 dn: CN=NTDS Settings,CN=DC2,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-

Heinz, I had exactly the same problem, and used ldbedit to apply the fix. Thanks for digging into this! Now I'm interested in the root cause as well ... Uli Am 16.01.2018 um 16:48 schrieb Heinz Hölzl via samba: > no, it seems to work!!! > > > i did a ldapmodify on DC2: > > ldapmodify -x -h dc2 -D cn=administrator,cn=users,dc=test,dc=net -W -f > serverReference.ldif

Louis, et al. Hi! So, I'm working on a 20.04 setup. I think I'll still use the distro version and not Louis' packages. [No offense Louis - I just need to be sure if (forbid) anything happens to Louis, his packages aren't going to be supported any more, and I'll be on my own for security updates etc. The 20.04 versions are pretty current, and I think will meet my needs for the

So, I'm curious about the contrast between modifying netplan vs simply disabling systemd.resolved Is there some advantage to the gyrations to make netplan work, vs simply disabling resolved and manually defining the IP and DNS server? [I'm not complaining, I'm thankful for all the options - just wanting to have the best handle possible on the reasoning behind one method vs the other.]

Hi, I want to use samba as AD on SLES 11 SP3. And I can make samba 4.5.x into some rpms which works well. Recently I try to build samba 4.8.0 using my spec file which works well on samba4.5.x. But when I test these rpms there is a problem. When I use ldap to access the domain to query some domain info, it remains me the directory service is not operational. This problem also appears in

Hi, Some time back I had written to the list about integrating Cisco ISE and facing errors with RPC login. When we actually integrated using ISE 2.4.0357 we noticed that Kerberos authentication is working like a charm. But MS-RPC authentication throws error. From the samba logs, we noticed that ISE workstation is able to negotiate the RPC ports switch to higher Dynamic RPC ports,

Hi! My DC is running Samba 4.8.2(Ubuntu 16) I have windows 2016(member domain), running IIS... But my site in IIS, use user the DC (in portal), but now dont worked , is much erro in log.samba when autentcation in site with user dc... Any Idea? Regards ---------------------------- [2018/05/28 17:35:52.085263,  0] ../lib/util/fault.c:78(fault_report)  

Hi Andrew, I am deeply impressed by your speed! :D The RODC is actually Samba 4.7.4, the other DCs are still on 4.6.12. Any suggestion how I can debug this w/o setting everything on level 10? ;) Best regards Johannes Am 22.01.2018 um 20:45 schrieb Andrew Bartlett: > On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 20:36 +0100, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> setting up a DMZ

Hi, I have a test AD running Samba on Ubuntu that I sometimes poke with Sysinternal's ADExplorer. A few days ago I tried connecting to it, but got a short reply of "The directory service is not available." As it was working earlier, I tried finding the problem. After installing a few older releases, I found that it was working on Ubuntu 17.04, Samba 4.5.8 and stopped working on

So, I'm generally running my DC's in VM's on Xen [XCP-NG]. And I'm considering recovery from different disaster situations - say a crashed/corrupt DC. Or hardware failure. Yes, I could run a second VM with a second DC. But unless I setup another XCP server and put the VM on that - the biggest threat to the current VM/DC is the hardware it's running on. So, it really

Hi, I used to upgrade/migrated samba 3.3.10 to samba 3.4.17 with LDAP backend in place, while upgrading the CentOS from 5.5 to 5.9. In place to retain the trust relationship. The users can able to login without re-authentication from existing machines. Tested 3 XPs, and 3 Win7 but it takes 5-8 mins to login compared to 1 win7 that was re-connected (disconnected from domain, restart, then rejoin

Hai guys,   I wanted to share the following site, not my site, but in my opinion, a very good setup for a windows image/deploy server. And im Dutch so its free ;-) ... :-))   See :  https://deployhappiness.com/ and https://fogproject.org/  i've just finished a deploy setup with fogserver and the info from deployhappiness.com   Some of direct links i used:

Hi, i have three problems in my AD. i have three DCs, four samba members and some Mac and Windows clients. first problem After some times my Windows and Mac clients can not login with the account cendentials. So i need to reboot the system and works fine. When the problem exists i got on my DC following log: [2016/03/03 12:39:10.029089, 3] ../lib/ldb-samba/ldb_wrap.c:320(ldb_wrap_connect)