similar to: AD dropping connection from storage cluster

Just a wild guess, but I and others have been having problems with samba_dlz, because of named "reload." Try to see if systemctl reload named and systemctl restart named break and fix the server respectively. (if your're not using systemd, try "serivice named reload", "service named restart instead") If you have a /etc/logrotate.d/named file containing

Hi, We are in the process of testing a migration of our current setup which contains Samba 4 as Classic DC with LDAP backend, Isilon OneFS bulk storage serving NFS/SMB shares and Windows/Mac/Linux clients to a more modern Samba 4 AD. We need to migrate to Samba AD because of Windows 10 and macos 10.13.x (and for several other reasons). But we run into an issue with authenticating the clients

Sure. It's actually a video, the part starts around 2:50 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSCJSVbFEfc On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Jan 2018 12:24:00 +0000 > Zdravko Zdravkov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Here's the problem. I've got working samba AD server.

Hi Rowland. Trying the suggested named.conf broke the local resolve of the storage as well (for clients in 192.168.26.0), so I reverted back to my old one since I have computers here using the storage at the moment. Would you have any other suggestions? On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 12:12:43 +0100 >

Hi, On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 12:28 +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:24:03 +0000 > "Deventer-2, M.S.J. van via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > we now have an old Windows NT4.0 domain served by Samba 4.2.x > > (using > > Samba and LDAP) and want to move to Windows AD. > > The reason

Hi, we now have an old Windows NT4.0 domain served by Samba 4.2.x (using Samba and LDAP) and want to move to Windows AD. The reason we need to do that is because of the clients (Windows 10 and MacOS) and because of a third party device which does not want to talk to Samba AD (Isilon OneFS). I did a 'classicupgrade' to Samba AD from our Samba/LDAP config and then I use this guide :

So, so.. Server and clients are CentOS7. Server was configured using samba-tool domain provision. *smb.conf* from server [global] > netbios name = AD > realm = XXXXXX > server role = active directory domain controller > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > workgroup =

On Thu, 3 May 2018 18:08:20 +0100 Zdravko Zdravkov via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland. > > As suggested I switched to winbind with rid backend, since I had free > time for tests today. This is what I've done for few min. > > smb.conf from the testing pc > > [global] > workgroup = XXXX > security = ads >

Here's the problem. I've got working samba AD server. I've configured it to work with bind9 DLZ backend and I'm managing the DNS entries from the windows DNS manager. I've made delegated DNS record for our EMC cluster storage, according to a guide. The record points to the SmartConnect service IP of the EMC. Since last week I've noticed that my DNS queries to the storage

Hi Denis. Since we have "tricky" people working on the Linux machines we prefer NFS because it's less hassle to mount and requires no credentials. Basically because of the users we tend to choose the easiest possible way for them to access the needed resources. I guess pam-script module mounting is exactly for this purpose, but I'll to research more since I'm not familiar

True that! Sorry smb.conf > [global] > netbios name = AD > realm = XXXX.CO.UK > server role = active directory domain controller > server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap, cldap, kdc, drepl, > winbindd, ntp_signd, kcc, dnsupdate > workgroup = XXXX > idmap config XXXX:unix_nss_info = yes >

Hi folks. I've just experienced strange behaviour with our samba ad configured with bind9 dlz and our ftp server (separate machine on the same network). In the past few days I've noticed significant drop of the download speed from the ftp server. As nothing obvious came to my mind I just rebooted our samba AD server. Afterwards the speed increased about 9 times, back to what we are used

Greetings Rowland. Are you able to provide sample config about this? I'm not sure how exactly to resolve single zone with BIND and forward everything else to the next dns server. Thank you for the help On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 11:55 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 28/06/2019 09:46, Zdravko Zdravkov via samba wrote: > > Hey all. > >

I download the samba-3.5.3.tar and need to create the executables for Solaris 10. I do not have the gcc compiler and would like to use the SUNWspro/bin/cc compiler. What I need is a "MyConfigure" script that will create a usable Makefile. I don't need anything fancy like ldap, ads etc. I do have gnumake. For example what environment variables are necessary (PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH,

I am wondering if anyone has any experience with the Isilon OneFS storage system (http://www.isilon.com/) using NFS to host storage for Dovecot. Thanks

Hi there. Setup is Centos 7.4 with Samba 4.7.4. I In our second office I've got configured Centos 7.5 with latest samba ad + dlz, which I've set just as Andrew suggested, using separate bind9 that forwards queries to the samba AD(dlz) for the given dns zone. Unfortunately the office isn't operational yet, so I can't share any experience. Best On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:11 AM

Hi all. Our setup is samba+dlz AD DC. Since last week the DNS doesn't resolve the delegated record for our storage *storage.domain.ltd* (192.168.26.xx) when being queried from clients in 192.168.29.0 which is our openvpn designated network. The OpenVPN is configured to push the DNS of our network, and also successfully resolves other hosts in the 192.168.26.0 subnet. I have no memory of

Hi guys. I've got working samba AD server. It is playing nicely with Windows 10 and also successfully authenticating Linux machines with SSSD. On the Windows machines I have our EMC storage smb mounted via group policy. Managing permissions for users and groups there, as you know, happens with right click, security etc.. As you may have already guessed the troubles come when my Linux

Fyi, I've been trying to get the devs to take notice of this problem. People keep pointing fingers. Samba says its Named/bind, bind says its the OS vendors.... See: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13214 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13230 Maybe I'll be forced to hack on the code myself to figure out what's really happening when a "reload" happens.

Hey all. I've got working samba AD server with dlz backend. To avoid performance issues I'm using external DNS which forwards queries for the AD zone to the Samba server, like that: zone "myadzone.int" { > type forward; > forwarders { 192.xx.x.xx; }; > }; 192.xx.x.xx = my AD Samba. This way it works alright, but on the external DNS I'm getting