similar to: dfree command...

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:00:02PM +0200, Robert S. Irrgang via samba wrote: > Nobody any idea? Use debug level 10 and log statements in your script to ensure it's being invoked and returning values. Without knowing details this is impossible to debug. > Am 30.04.2018 um 19:40 schrieb Robert S. Irrgang via samba: > > Hello, > > > > I've a little problem with

I've put it in debug mode level 10. The only place where dfree was displayed in the log is this. [2018/05/04 04:53:53.397520, 3, pid=13784, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] ../source3/param/loadparm.c:2668(lp_do_section) Processing section "[global]" ... doing parameter read raw = no doing parameter write raw = no doing parameter write cache size = 262144 doing

I have 2 SCSI disks each w/a RH 7.3 ext3 root filesystem: /dev/sdb1, and /dev/sdc1. /dev/sda1 is an old RH4.2 root filesystem. (sdb1 was created as an image of sdc1 using dd.) I have no problem booting from a SYSLINUX 1.52 floppy with SYSLINUX.CFG containing "append initrd=initrd.img root=/dev/sdb1". When I alter SYSLINUX.CFG with: "append initrd=initrd.img root=/dev/sdc1".

On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 05:10:47AM +0200, Robert S. Irrgang via samba wrote: > I've put it in debug mode level 10. > The only place where dfree was displayed in the log is this. > > [2018/05/04 04:53:53.397520, 3, pid=13784, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] > ../source3/param/loadparm.c:2668(lp_do_section) > Processing section "[global]" > ... > doing

Signed-off-by: Pino Tsao <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/btrfs.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-devices.sh | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 67 insertions(+) diff --git a/daemon/btrfs.c b/daemon/btrfs.c index 39392f7..acc300d 100644 --- a/daemon/btrfs.c +++

Hi, When I upgraded my cluster, df started returning some odd numbers for my legacy volumes. Newly created volumes after the upgrade, df works just fine. I have been researching since Monday and have not found any reference to this symptom. "vm-images" is the old legacy volume, "test" is the new one. [root at st-srv-03 ~]# (df -h|grep bricks;ssh st-srv-02 'df -h|grep

在 2015年06月12日 17:12, Pino Toscano 写道: > On Friday 12 June 2015 10:58:34 Pino Tsao wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 在 2015年06月11日 17:43, Pino Toscano 写道: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Wednesday 10 June 2015 17:54:18 Pino Tsao wrote: >>>> Signed-off-by: Pino Tsao <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >>>> --- >>>> daemon/btrfs.c

Hi, 在 2015年06月11日 17:43, Pino Toscano 写道: > Hi, > > On Wednesday 10 June 2015 17:54:18 Pino Tsao wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Pino Tsao <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> daemon/btrfs.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> generator/actions.ml | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/btrfs/test-btrfs-devices.sh |

Hello, i recently installed Centos 5 on a new server with a single scsii disk. After the installation, i added 2 additional disks that were once the components of a raid0 array on another server. I get some errors and am unable to start the array the following is an extract from dmesg output: md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: could not open unknown-block(8,17). md: could not open

Dear All, I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server. I have an VG call vg_hosting consisting of 4 PVs each contained in a separate hard drive (/dev/sda1, /dev/sdb1, /dev/sdc1, and /dev/sdd1). And this LV: lv_home was created to use all the space of the 4 PVs. Right now, the third hard drive is damaged; and therefore the third PV (/dev/sdc1) cannot be accessed anymore. I would like

I'm trying to get RSV-S8 working with Citrix XenServer 5 update 3 (which I believe runs CentOS 5.something). I have the Rosewill card that comes with it in there (sil3132 based). It's seeing the card, and seeing all my drives. I fdisk the drives and I can create the partitions, but I am unable to set up either software raid or create filesystems. I keep getting errors saying that

Hi, I'm using LVM based storage pools and I'm wondering if there is a way to specify several source-dev on the command line for creating a volume group spread over several devices : one device /dev/sdc1 is ok: * virsh pool-define-as --name lvmpool --type logical --source-dev /dev/sdc1 --source-name vg --target /dev/vg I would like something like (but sadly doesn't work): ? virsh

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

Dear James, Thank you for being quick to help. Yes, I could see all of them: # vgs # lvs # pvs Regards, Khem On Sat, February 28, 2015 7:37 am, James A. Peltier wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > | Dear All, > | > | I am in desperate need for LVM data rescue for my server. > | I have an VG call vg_hosting consisting of 4 PVs each contained in a > | separate

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Hello, I am on Ubuntu Server 13.04 with Linux 3.8. I''ve created a "single-raid" using /dev/sd{a,b,c,d}{1,3}. One of my hard drives has failed, I mean it''s materially dead. :~$ sudo btrfs filesystem show Label: none uuid: 40886f51-8c9b-4be1-8721-83bf5653d2a0 Total devices 5 FS bytes used 226.90GB devid 4 size 37.27GB used 31.01GB path /dev/sdd1