similar to: What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share

Knut Krüger via samba wrote: > What is the maximum speed for download from a samba share? > > I have a 100 kbit/s Internet > > The maximum speed for a download from my webserver with samba is about > 25.000 kbit/s > > The bottleneck is the samba access. Without samba I can download with > 100 kbit/s > > So the question? is it possible to get more speed or is

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De

On 5/20/20 7:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The old test relied on issuing an asynchronous command to a qemu-io > subprocess, requiring a sleep to ensure that the command had been > carried out. ‘sleep 1’ was not long enough on s390x as you can see > from this partial trace: Nice analysis. > Here are still connecting to nbdkit from "connection A", long after >

This commit works for me, but TBH I'm not clear on what the actual purpose of this test is supposed to be. Rich.

> Limiting the linux-server's max cpu-speed had > the most affect on performance: > (limited to 1.6GHz instead of 2.4GHz) (33% limitation) The server is equipped with an 6 core / 12 tread 3.6 GHz CPU (Intel Core i7-980x   and  a Raid 10 Disk array. The cpu is 90% idle (including webserver traffic and mailserver traffic) during downloads. There is no encryption because the samba VM

This is a series of patches to libnbd and nbdkit adding AF_VSOCK support. On the host side it allows you to start an nbdkit instance which listens on a virtio-vsock socket: $ ./nbdkit -fv --vsock memory 1G ... nbdkit: debug: bound to vsock 2:10809 On the guest side you can then use libnbd to connect to the server: $ ./run nbdsh -c 'h.connect_vsock(2, 10809)' -c

As counter example. My slowest server, AMD E350 2 core, max 1.6Gz. On 1Gb lan, disk 2x 5400rpm software raid 1 + 1 ssd. Copy Speed 115Mb/s as in max 1Gb bandwith, from a win7 and win10 pc to the raid1. File sizes. 100Mb+ get max 115Mb/s to a 4MB blocksized partition. 1-10mb files ,max 90-115Mb/s to a 1MB blocksized partition. 0.0-1mb files ,max 60-100Mb/s to a 4k blocksized partition.

Hi, i have uploaded a little gz compressed tarball http://scdbackup.webframe.org/block_seq.tgz containing -rwxr-xr-x thomas/thomas 4552 2017-03-21 09:23 block_seq -rw-r--r-- thomas/thomas 315 2017-03-21 09:22 block_seq.c To be unpacked in a suitable directory by tar xvzf block_seq.tgz The binary "block_seq" was compiled on Debian Jessie. If it does not run, do cc -o

Dear All, I need to convert some Northing-Easting coordinates from the Gauss-Krüger system into latitude-longitude. Any suggestions on how to do it? Regards, Marco Marco Giannitrapani Statistical Consultant Tel: +44151373 5945 Email: Internet: http://www.shell.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello Gene, thanks for your reply. Yes BIOS mode. The config wants a menu, which loads fine under ext4 and not under btrfs. Under btrfs I have also tried to remove the syslinux.cfg file altogether (which should trigger the boot: prompt if I am not mistaken) and the result is the same: only the copyright line appears and no prompt. The three letter sequence is EDD. The disk is 160GB, here is the

I swear I've done this dozens of times: a new server, going to install (CentOS 7, in this case), and I manually partition the disk before the install using parted, and do mkpart pri 0.0GB +1.0GB Except now it appears to be saying it doesn't like the +1.0GB, I *think* it's the plus sign. mark

This program allows you to turn a network block device source into a FUSE filesystem containing a virtual file: $ nbdkit memory 128M $ mkdir mp $ nbdfuse mp/ramdisk nbd://localhost & $ ls -l mp total 0 -rw-rw-rw-. 1 rjones rjones 134217728 Oct 12 15:09 ramdisk $ dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1M count=128 of=mp/ramdisk conv=notrunc,nocreat 128+0 records in 128+0 records out

Hi everyone, I'm trying to make quota to work in dovecot 1.0.rc15 in a Debian machine. Setting the limit to 1GB and starting to fill up the mailbox and nothing stopped me. It just kept growing and nothing happened. Restarted the service and nothing. I had already exceeded the 1 GB limit and nothing happens, the mailbox still goes bigger and bigger... The *"check_quota"* plugin for

Hi, The following series of patches implements in btrfs an ioctl to do out-of-band deduplication of file extents. To be clear, this means that the file system is mounted and running, but the dedupe is not done during file writes, but after the fact when some userspace software initiates a dedupe. The primary patch is loosely based off of one sent by Josef Bacik back in January, 2011.

This is a series of patches to libnbd and nbdkit adding AF_VSOCK support. On the host side it allows you to start an nbdkit instance which listens on a virtio-vsock socket: $ ./nbdkit -fv --vsock memory 1G ... nbdkit: debug: bound to vsock 2:10809 On the guest side you can then use libnbd to connect to the server: $ ./run nbdsh -c 'h.connect_vsock(2, 10809)' -c

Hi, altmbr.bin and its variants apparently always boot the first partition (in Syslinux 4.05, but this issue seems older than that). The following example uses parted 3.0: ---------- rm -f flat mkdir mnt truncate -s 20M flat parted -s flat mklabel msdos mkpart primary fat32 1MiB 10485759B mkpart primary ext2 11MiB 100% unit KiB print losetup -o 1048576 -s 9437184 /dev/loop7 flat mkdosfs

Hi all - The following 9 patches add more error handling to the btrfs code: - Add btrfs_panic - Catch locking failures in {set,clear}_extent_bit - Push up set_extent_bit errors to callers - Push up lock_extent errors to callers - Push up clear_extent_bit errors to callers - Push up unlock_extent errors to callers - Make pin_down_extent return void - Push up btrfs_pin_extent errors to

The old test relied on issuing an asynchronous command to a qemu-io subprocess, requiring a sleep to ensure that the command had been carried out. ‘sleep 1’ was not long enough on s390x as you can see from this partial trace: + exec + qemu-io -f raw nbd:unix:/tmp/tmp.jqOZGj6dnX + exec + echo 'Reading from connection A, try 1' Reading from connection A, try 1 +

Greeting All I am using Filebench benchmark in an "Interactive mode" to test ZFS performance with randomread wordload. My Filebench setting & run results are as follwos ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ filebench> set $filesize=5g filebench> set $dir=/hdd/fs32k filebench> set $iosize=32k filebench> set

Hi all, i want to replace a bunch of Apple Xserves with Xraids and HFS+ (brr) by Sun x4200 with SAS-Jbods and ZFS. The application will be the Helios UB+ fileserver suite. I installed the latest Solaris 10 on a x4200 with 8gig of ram and two Sun SAS controllers, attached two sas-jbods with 8 SATA-HDDs each und created a zfs pool as a raid 10 by doing something like the following: [i]zpool create