similar to: samba4 auth (ldap) starnge problem

On 20.04.2018 11:26, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:23:37 +0200 > "Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> we have updated our samba4 AD a few weeks ago from 4.4.latest -> >> 4.5.latest using the sernet packages. > You do realise that the 4.5.x series is now EOL as far as Samba

Hi, a short question about changing passwords. Our linux login server is using winbind for authentication. Everything is working well, but changing the password for a user does not work. We see the following error: passwd Changing password for USER (current) NT password: passwd: Authentication token manipulation error passwd: password unchanged /var/log/auth.log pam_winbind(sshd:auth):

Thanks a lot. I will check it. We do not use kerberos - is it necessary ? Bye, Peer On 03.01.2018 15:15, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hi Peer, > > This is my output, this account testaccount1 was created 2 minutes ago before the tests below. > > passwd testaccount1 > Current Kerberos password: > Enter new Kerberos password: > Retype new Kerberos password: >

Hi, we are running samba 4.4 on two machines as file servers. Both are running a GFS (stornext). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares using 2x1GB and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With samba3 I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB/s (wire speed). Using

On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: > Hi Micha, > > no, I have to this. I'm normally just check what smbstatus shows: > > 33837   BGC\pkoch    users        XXX (ipv4:XXX:51118)    SMB2_10 > > Bye the way - 45 MB/s is not so bad, I just wanted to know if it's > possible to get 90MB/s or at 10G a little bit more. >

On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 09:35:06AM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: > Setup:  Server 2x10GB NIC, client 1x1GB: > > Using smbclient with -mSMB3 I get an average of 52000 KiloBytes/sec (before > 45000), > > using NFS (v3) from the same server I get  108000 KiloBytes/sec an more > (mount ; cp; umount; ...) So I don't think it's the client. The smbclient

It is an issue that I myself would also like to solve. I found multiple threads in samba and freeradius mailing lists. It seems that every couple of months there is question like this either here on FR mailing list and all point down to the same issue, that is: freeradius uses ntlm_auth (even when using winbind with newer freeradius versions, it also in the end uses ntlm_auth). And since

Er,there it is. I want to use samba to build a domain. I want to join computers into this domain. And I need to access this domain to get sid of computers in the domain, using C# class DirectoryEntry as 'ldap://my domain info' in my another program. ---- On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 01:27:54,"Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >On Fri, 20 Apr 2018

Perfect ! You are right. objectClass: posixAccount was missing and caused the problems. Thanks a lot! Bye, Peer On 20.04.2018 12:40, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 17:14:03 +0800 > "ryanyang51 at 163.com" <ryanyang51 at 163.com> wrote: > >> But the program works well with samba4.5.x. In fact I think it's the >> compile progress or

Hi, we are still using a setup with openldap + samba3. On the unix systems we are using ldap for authentication, for all windows clients samba is used. When we migrate to samba4 what will happen to the unix clients ? Can they ask the samba4 PDC ? For an update . are there other Howto's as the https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/samba-tool/domain/classicupgrade/HOWTO just to get some

just to verify basic facts: Did you cross check vie network sniff, on which SMB protocol versions Server + Win 7 clients agree ? Or did you pin down via registry ? AFAIK only starting with win 8 or win 10 clients you could ask with powershell, which protocol version is in use. Did you also cross check samba logs for a name resolution issue ( windows names, not DNS) if one of your boxes is an

Hi, I don't know if the password check script is executed if you change the password using samba. You can simply test it: Download "LdapAdmin": http://www.ldapadmin.org Connect to your DC as a user. Then navigate to your user object and click on "Set password" in the context menu. Then you can verify if your script will be executed. Other options like the password length

Hi, we have a couple of users which "forget" to change the passwords even if they get an reminder. Normally we tell them to use a windows machine, where you can change your password if it's expired. But how can a remote user change his password if it's expired ? Is there any secure solution for this  ? -- Bye, Peer

Hi, we switched from SAMBA3+Openldap to SAMBA4 four weeks ago. Most servers are working. However we noticed some strange behavior: Under some circumstances the authentication does not work anymore, but all daemons etc. are up and running. Also locally on the DC everything seems to be fine. But NO service will authenticated successfully against the domain. Stopping the server for 1-2min and

Hi, we have updated our samba AD domain from 4.4.x to 4.5.x. The release notes for 4.5.0 included  "NTLMv1 authentication disabled by default". So we had to enable it to get our radius (freeradius) server working (for 802.1x). What would be the best way to change the freeradius configuration in such a way, that we can disable NTLMv1 again. The radius server is used for WLAN

Hi, we have installed R-2.8.1 using the current pgi compiler (8.0.2) for AMD64 on a SLES9 system. When I try to install "Matrix" everything is fine until the last step. make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R.INSTALL.TW3399/Matrix/src/AMD' pgCC -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -pgf90libs -o Matrix.so CHMfactor.o Csparse.o TMatrix_as.o Tsparse.o init.o Mutils.o chm_common.o

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed

Setup:  Server 2x10GB NIC, client 1x1GB: Using smbclient with -mSMB3 I get an average of 52000 KiloBytes/sec (before 45000), using NFS (v3) from the same server I get  108000 KiloBytes/sec an more (mount ; cp; umount; ...) Bye, Peer On 03.11.2017 17:01, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:54:10PM +0100, Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba wrote: >> Hi Micha, >>

Hi, we found that the timestamp of files is not displayed correctly, since the time switched to summer time. The file server has the right time and under unix the "ls -l" shows the correct time, but under windows 1h is added (all files seems to live in the future). Any hint ? Bye, Peer _________________________________________________________ Max-Planck-Institut fuer Biogeochemie

Hi Micha, no, I have to this. I'm normally just check what smbstatus shows: 33837   BGC\pkoch    users        XXX (ipv4:XXX:51118)    SMB2_10 Bye the way - 45 MB/s is not so bad, I just wanted to know if it's possible to get 90MB/s or at 10G a little bit more. What has been messaured  ? I used on a new HPC node (10G) smbclient to test the transfer speed and get (10G<->10G)