similar to: Samba Debian Packages Wheezy 4.7.7

Hi, Backported samba-4.4.3 from debian unstabel to debian wheezy today. May be of interest for others so i share the instructions and patches here. Ten packages from unstabel must be backported, I modified some to use python2.7 and removed dependencies to python2.6 and python3 (the later is not available in an recent enough version on wheezy/wheezy-backports). 1. Install build dependencies

Hai, No exactly Rowland. There is not missing anything. And he is correct, that file is missing in the official ubuntu and debian packages. I suggest report a bug at ubuntu, its missing in all there samba packages. https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=cosmic&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=glusterfs.so You can pretty easy rebuild the ubuntu package if you need it.

Hello Guys, While i work out the snapper on fedora 25 I've learnd more about python and snapper. Here the changes: Snapper: Created a combat util-linux 2.24.2 from fedora 20, static only. This make snapper rollback available (needfull thing). Tryed to patch snapper, there are to many changes. This will not breake centos 7 system. Only works for x86 / amd64 only this days & Centos 7,

Hai,   Fist.. i start with a BIG THANK YOU to Achim Gottinger for making these samba wheezy packages and sharing them.   Achim created the samba 4.6.2 packages and i did a rebuild and checkup of these. I have uploaded the packages in my apt repo and to the download location.   Achim already applied the following to bug fixed: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12685  net ads keytab

Hello Guys, Last Sunday I had the idea to expand my gameplay btrfs. Now what was missing was a yum plugin which worked like arch or opensuse. Ok, I told myself and learned a little python. Also something for grub2 to boot into a snapshot. My results are up on: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/andybe/Centos7Btrfs/ grub2-btrfs (do not use grub-btrfs, this is the version before)

Hi, I''ve created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to snapper, it''s a tool for managing btrfs snapshots (http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper). It depends on libblocxx available from https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-esser-n/+archive/blocxx , and currently uses git source up to commit 50dec40. I''ve done

Michal Pr??vozn??k > On 6/12/23 20:17, Jerry Buburuz wrote: >> Just found my issue. >> After I removed the cephfs mounts it worked! >> I will debug ceph. >> I assumed because I could touch files on mounted cephfs it was working. Now virsh list works! > Out of curiosity. Do you perhaps have a storage pool defined over cephfs? I can see two possible sources for the

Hai,   I've got an update of Achim Gottinger again for the wheezy packages.   The apt repo is updated from 4.6.2 to 4.6.3.   These packages include the "unable to upload 32bit printer drivers" patch. https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12761   Info about the repo here : http://apt.van-belle.nl/   All packages are signed, amd64 and i386 and sources available through the

My setup is Samba/smbclient version 3.0.1 on linux RedHat 9. \\snapper\dfs is a dfs share on snapper, a Win2k3 Active Directory server. My smb.conf contains: [global] realm = ciswinnet.cis.uab.edu workgroup=CISWINNET security = ADS encrypt passwords = yes password server = snapper.cis.uab.edu client use spnego = yes I am trying to run the following command: smbclient \\\\snapper\\dfs

Hi, some time back we had similar discussions when we, as an email provider, discussed to move away from traditional NAS/NFS storage to Ceph. The problem with POSIX file systems and dovecot is that e.g. with mdbox only around ~20% of the IO operations are READ/WRITE, the rest are metadata IOs. You will not change this with using CephFS since it will basically behave the same way as e.g. NFS. We

Hello Jack, yes, I imagine I'll have to do some work on tuning the block size on cephfs. Thanks for the advise. I knew that using mdbox, messages are not removed but I though that was true in sdbox too. Thanks again. We'll soon do benchmarks of sdbox vs mdbox over cephfs with bluestore backend. We'll have to do some some work on how to simulate user traffic, for writes and readings.

As recommended by Volker Lendecke I added the option. rpcd_winreg:idle_seconds = 5 Now on 2GB Servers swapping is avoided and on 1Gb Servers the server goes back to normal in ~5 seconds after the logon process has finished. Am 10.10.2023 um 13:58 schrieb Achim Gottinger via samba: > Dear Samba Group, > > I recently updates our samba addc's to 4.18.6 (from 4.7.7). We use roaming

I have a script that normally runs my snapshot that I haven't used for the past several days because something seemed to be going wrong and I wanted to run things manually. But running the script twice today, I got: > snaphome Found 15 mounted dated, snaps or snap archives ?[snapper#2120]base_mp=/home 1 snap dated today. (Use: '--force=force_create_snap' to force another snap.)

If you add to vfs module to a share you also have to explicit add acl_xattr , that's what i do when i want to add another module and keep acl_xattr on the same share, if i'm not doing right way someone correct me . ----- Original Message ----- From: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> Cc: "Oleg Cherkasov"

Hi list, we have migrated a single node Samba server from Ubuntu Trusty to a 3-node CTDB Cluster on Debian Bullseye with Sernet packages. Storage is CephFS. We are running Samba in Standalone Mode with LDAP Backend. Samba Version: sernet-samba 99:4.18.2-2debian11 I don't know if it is relevant here's how we have mounted CephFS on the samba nodes: (fstab):/samba /srv/samba ceph

On 06. aug. 2018 16:37, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: > On 06. aug. 2018 15:15, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: >> >> This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 >> installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to >> shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server >> 2008R2.  Everything has

Thanks Jack. That's good to know. It is definitely something to consider. In a distributed storage scenario we might build a dedicated pool for that and tune the pool as more capacity or performance is needed. Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:45 PM Jack <ceph at jack.fr.eu.org> wrote:

On 06. aug. 2018 15:15, Oleg Cherkasov via samba wrote: > > This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 > installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to > shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server > 2008R2.  Everything has been running ok for last few year.  I have been > upgrading Samba and FreeBSD

I'm sending this message to both dovecot and ceph-users ML so please don't mind if something seems too obvious for you. Hi, I have a question for both dovecot and ceph lists and below I'll explain what's going on. Regarding dbox format (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox), when using sdbox, a new file is stored for each email message. When using mdbox, multiple

Hi, This morning three of our FreeBSD-11.1-p11 servers with Samba 4.7.7 installations started to ignore ACL settings and reject user access to shares.  All three servers are members of DC running on Windows Server 2008R2.  Everything has been running ok for last few year.  I have been upgrading Samba and FreeBSD installations and on last Friday upgraded to the latest packages from