similar to: Order of Dcs resolv.conf

Greetings, I'm not sure what else to add. If you need more info please let me know. Any input is greatly appreciated. Eric On Sat, Mar 4, 2023 at 2:58?PM Eric <rvwbug at gmail.com> wrote: > Greetings, > > This is my first attempt at multi-site with unique subnets (actually > first attempt at more than on DC). > > I had the existing "defaultFirstSite"

Is it possible to specify a list of DCs for Samba to use, rather than have it look them up dynamically via DNS? I have an issue with Kerberos, Samba, and SSSD where my machines stop authenticating after a period of time – preAuthentication errors, etc. I suspect it's because of a "DC mismatch" between the three. Because we have numerous DCs all over the world, I specifically

On 01/01/15 14:53, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hello Rowland, > > Am 01.01.2015 um 15:19 schrieb Rowland Penny: >> OK, anybody know why, if you provision a domain with bind as the >> backend, the dns users name is all lowercase, but if you join another >> DC, the dns users name is partially in uppercase ? >> >> i.e. my first DC has a dns user called dns-dc01, my

You believe that SSSD is bypassing Samba entirely and going direct to Kerberos? That’s possible. At the moment, to the best of my understanding, Samba is only being used to join the domain. There are no file/printer/etc. shares happening; this is just basic domain join/membership and keytab generation and after that it’s done. The question was still specific to Samba itself: can I specify the DCs

I found adcli a little too late; I plan to use it in the future but for the time being I just deployed 16 VMs using Samba so we’re going to keep that for now! Also, the rest of what I wrote can be disregarded – I figured out exactly why my hosts were failing to authenticate after a period of time. It’s too stupid to admit publicly. On 8/23/16, 3:50 PM, "samba on behalf of Kris Lou via

a nice example about dns islanding. http://retrohack.com/a-word-or-two-about-dns-islanding/ and with only 2 dc's setup the resolv.confs like : DC01 Primary DNS 10.1.1.2 Secondary DNS 127.0.0.1 DC02 Primary DNS 10.1.1.1 Secondary DNS 127.0.0.1 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff807362%28v=ws.10%29.aspx says: If the loopback IP address is the first entry in the list of

Apparently I missed a step somewhere! On DC01 /etc/systemd/resolved.conf says [Resolve] #DNS= #FallbackDNS= #Domains= #LLMNR=no #MulticastDNS=no #DNSSEC=no #DNSOverTLS=no #Cache=yes #DNSStubListener=yes #ReadEtcHosts=yes On DC02 it reads [Resolve] DNS=8.8.8.8 FallbackDNS=8.8.4.4 #Domains= #LLMNR=no #MulticastDNS=no DNSSEC=no #DNSOverTLS=no #Cache=yes #DNSStubListener=yes #ReadEtcHosts=yes So

Il 29/11/2018 15:22, Rowland Penny via samba ha scritto: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 15:03:03 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> You dns keytab looks strange, my be due to manual changes.. > It looks strange because there is one of these missing: > > 1 DNS/mysamba4dc.mydomain.com at MYDOMAIN.COM > > Could be cut &

Hi All, In my environment, I have a total of 4 DCs (Samba 4.7.6) running in VMs. Their uptime schedule goes like this: dc00 : usually 100% unless there's a failure. dc01 : same as above dc02 : a few days per week. dc03 : a few days per month. This has the consequence that a DNS A lookup on the AD domain shows 4 IPs, 2 of which are usually not up. Because I don't have shared storage in

Am 26.09.18 um 20:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 27 Sep 2018 06:29:26 +1200 > Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > >> On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 14:47 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:28:42 +0200 >>> Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> dc01:~#

On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 08:04 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:06:10 +0200 > PaLi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hello > > > > I have a strange problem on a brand new installation of samba AD > > (samba-4.19.5 on Fedora 39). > > > > Domain controller is dc01.some.domain.org > > Secondary

Hello, I inherited an Active directory in Windows in Spanish, after a lot of work I was able to do the first synchronization to a DC in Samba. Now I am at the stage that I want to remove Windows, but previously I want to remove Windows. I am trying to add another DC in Samba to advance and I am presented with the following problem. I feel lost with these errors. root at DC01:~# samba-tool fsmo

Hi Epsilon, I think the issue here is with localization support in Samba. You "Default-First-Site" in Spanish MS-AD is translated (as it is in French AD), and it seems that it looks for the following site name during the join: CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=conylec,DC=local while it should be trying to create the entry in the following site name:

On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 15:38:23 +0200 pavel.lisy at gmail.com wrote: > On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 08:04 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:06:10 +0200 > > PaLi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > > > I have a strange problem on a brand new installation of samba AD > > >

Hi all, I have just added a DC to our existing AD. Join did work without any error messages but now I have recognized that only inbound replication from old DCs is working outbound list is empty. Samba version is: Version 4.2.0pre1-GIT-cff0f8e here is the output of samba-tool drs showrepl: DSA Options: 0x00000001 DSA object GUID: 94534f65-5d06-41f5-844d-a58a0bc03c93 DSA invocationId:

To get the question of why new servers, this one I'm using has hardware whose remaining life is measured in days. The elastic bands and sticky tape it is held together with won't hold for much longer. I'm using it to build and test a new environment, but then I need to migrate that onto something with a little more vitality before bringing it into production (in the next 56 hours). As

Thank you everyone for your help. I corrected my resolv.conf files as Peter Milesson suggested and then had to take a number of extra steps so now things are looking a little better. In case it helps anyone else in the future, here's what I found (plus I am now having problems resolving internal addresses). As far as I can see, the setup on both servers is identical (except they use their own

On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 08:06:10 +0200 PaLi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello > > I have a strange problem on a brand new installation of samba AD > (samba-4.19.5 on Fedora 39). > > Domain controller is dc01.some.domain.org > Secondary (replicated) controller is dc02.some.domain.org > > After clean installation all basic tests seams to be ok.

I have created a DC01 & DC02 with Louis's (generation one) scripts. I have noticed, during some testing that 'pam-auth-update' shows PAM profiles Kerberos, Unix & Winbind listed on DC01. The DC02 only lists Kerberos & Unix and Winbind is missing. I thought that the two DC's were suppose to be identical? If DC01 goes "down" DC02 cannot carry a winbind

Hello $LIST, i setup a new clean domain to examine the feature of updating/creating PTR records. When i call ipconfig /registerdns on the client i get this entry in the windows eventlog (sorry german) Fehler beim Registrieren der Hostressourceneinträge (A oder AAAA) für den Netzwerkadapter mit den folgenden Einstellungen: Adaptername: {2A467E48-624B-4CCF-9B7D-9BA5629D8117}