similar to: wiki suggestions

On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 17:57:54 +0200 Klaus Hartnegg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > This is a collection of notes that I took while setting up an AD-DC. > I do not want to edit the Wiki pages myself, without first asking > experts whether my assumptions are correct. > > Klaus > > > ---- > > On page >

Am 10.04.2018 um 18:46 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Thanks for the updates, I just wish more people would report errors & > typo's I can send some more, this time from classicupgrade. Again I do not want to do these changes myself, a samba expert should have a look. Feedback for wiki page Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_Domain_to_Samba_AD_(Classic_Upgrade) Tried on Devuan 1 with

On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:29:39 +0200 Klaus Hartnegg via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 10.04.2018 um 18:46 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > Thanks for the updates, I just wish more people would report errors > > & typo's > > I can send some more, this time from classicupgrade. > > Again I do not want to do these changes myself, a samba

Am 26.04.2018 um 20:07 schrieb Harry Jede via samba: > No, i have created 2 users with same sid. > > root at capella:~# pdbedit -Lv | grep "User SID" | sort|uniq -d > root at capella:~# > > root at capella:~# pdbedit -L|grep Failing > ldapsam_getsampwsid: More than one user with SID [S-1-5-21-3958726613-3318811842-4132420312-21010]. Failing. count=2 >

Am 26.04.2018 um 19:39 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > 'workgroup' is another way > of saying 'netbios domain name', so 'workgroup\user' means exactly > the same as 'domain\user' According to "man smb.conf" workgroup is not the same as netbios name. > When you provision a domain, it will set the netbios domain name to the > left hand

Am 06.06.2018 um 12:41 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > I think that 'standalone' machines will continue Thank you very much for clarification. This means that SMB1 and PDC are the problems, not lack of AD. But if we later need to switch to AD, is there a method like classicupgrade to do it? Currently classicupgrade of a standalone server Samba 3 creates a standalone server Samba

Hi, I just installed a new AD-DC as described in the wiki. Administrator can log on and see the two default-shares. Then I used ADUC from RSAT to create an OU and a user. User can see the shares (and can map them to a drive letter), but is denied to look inside. Same for another share which I added. Even when administrator grants permission to everybody. I read more wiki, which made me to add a

Hi Rowland, The user's ID range would have been below 3600, the current max rid is 3506 The links have been setup following this link, then restarted the samba-ad-dc service https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Libnss_winbind_Links I followed the following to configure the winbindd stuff, https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configuring_Winbindd_on_a_Samba_AD_DC template shell = /bin/bash

Hi, We did a classicupgrade of our Ubuntu Server (4.3.11, TDB), the server DC5 also host shares. Post the migration we are seeing some permission issues. When trying to give permission to a domain group/user to folder/file we get the following chown "LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup" adtest/ chown: invalid user: 'LIN\\myadmin:LIN\\adgroup' wbinfo --ping-dc : checking the NETLOGON

Hi, We plan to upgrade servers, and wonder which configuration is future-proof. Must we switch to AD, or will a new Standalone Server also continue to serve Windows 10 clients? Several messages suggest that new Windows sometimes cannot access old Samba. What exactly is the cause? Is it Standalone Server versus Domain, is it old-style PDC versus AD, or is it SMB protocol version 1 versus 2 or

Hello my latest content updates: * https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member New page. It replaces the old "Member Server" page, which shows now just a notice (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_a_Samba_AD_Member_Server) Everything to know is described on the new "Domain Member" page. In combination with the file-/printserver and other

Hi Rowland, Fair comment. This is not a new domain and we are migrating to AD. The box in question runs Samba 3.6 (PDC and a physical box) and as such we are not able to directly migrate it. We are adding a Samba 4 box (a VM) , to which will become the new PDC . This box will then be used to migrate to AD. The Samba 3 box will converted as a file server. The confusion in smb.conf is possibly

Hi Anton, Thanks a lot for offering help. Bullet uses basic linear algebra with 4-way vectors, quaternion and matrices. Although most of this is plain portable C++ perhaps LLVM can auto-vectorize some of this? There is a little bit of hand optimized x86 SSE code. This is only enabled on 32bit Windows and Mac OSX Intel builds. >> Should I just use the 2.75 release? If you are interested,

Hi, We are developing the open source Bullet physics engine, used by game and movie studios, and compiler performance tuning is important to us. See http://bullet.googlecode.com The physics engine includes collision detection, rigid body dynamics and soft body dynamics. I've been following the LLVM project for a while, and it seems the Clang C++ compiler is mature enough to compile our

> On 29.09.2017 11:44 Rowland Penny wrote: > Have you set up the libnss_winbind links, PAM and /etc/nsswitch.conf ? Yes, I had modified two lines in /etc/nsswitch.conf: passwd: files winbind group: files winbind No, I had not seen a pointer to libnss, but now did ln -s /usr/local/samba/lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 /lib/i386-linux-gnu/ ln -s

On 09/11/15 18:18, James wrote: > On 11/9/2015 12:45 PM, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: >> Hello >> >> my latest content updates: >> >> >> * https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member >> New page. It replaces the old "Member Server" page, which shows now >> just a notice >>

Hello, Erwin > The physics engine includes collision detection, rigid body dynamics and > soft body dynamics. This sounds really promising addition to LLVM testsuite! > to compile our source tree and benchmarks. Bullet 2.75 uses a lot of > SIMD-friendly vector operations, Which archs are currently supported for SIMD operations? > The SDK is under Bullet/src and the benchmarks

Hello, Erwin > If you are interested, I think it is best to start with Bullet 2.75. > If it turns out that LLVM requires some modifications (due to current C++ > limitations), > we can modify Bullet and go for an uncoming release such as Bullet 2.76 > (planned around January 2010). I added bullet to LLVM testsuite. Basically I had to flatten source directories since this is a

> On 29.09.2017 14:32 Rowland Penny wrote: > I cannot see where it says not to use on a DC I misread the first section. > What does 'getent passwd username' actually produce ? root at dc1:~# getent passwd administrator COMPANY\administrator:*:0:100::/home/COMPANY/administrator:/bin/false root at dc1:~# getent passwd klaus

Hi CentOS-Docs Team! I got distracted and didn't re-read the "contribute to the wiki" instructions before sending off a message to this list (I'm subscribed to Docs now for sure!). So my initial message hit the bit bucket 'cause I wasn't subscribed (d'oh!). http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2015-April/thread.html You'll find a copy of my original