similar to: Windows Roaming Profile - Logout Time

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Windows Roaming Profile - Logout Time"

2014 Jul 02
1
recording in mp3
> Problem with this is client needs to listen to the call recordings and my interface will only display .wav or .mp3 so they will moan if they have to wait until the next day for today's recordings If you're up to writing a bit of shell script, and are running on Linux, you could automate the conversion process so that it happens as soon as the recording is completed. Look at the
2015 Jun 03
0
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Dear Adam First we were using a python script that was working on 4 threads and therefore removing 4 snapshots at the time throughout the cluster, that still caused problems. Now i took the snapshot removing out of the threaded part an i am just looping through each snapshot on each VM one after another, even with ³sleeps² inbetween, but the problem remains. But i am getting the impression that
2015 May 31
0
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
And sorry, another update, it does kill the VM partly, it was still pingable when i wrote the last mail, but no ssh and no spice console possible From: Soeren Malchow <soeren.malchow@mcon.net<mailto:soeren.malchow@mcon.net>> Date: Monday 1 June 2015 01:35 To: Soeren Malchow <soeren.malchow@mcon.net<mailto:soeren.malchow@mcon.net>>,
2015 Jun 02
2
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Hello Soeren. I've started to look at this issue and I'd agree that at first glance it looks like a libvirt issue. The 'cannot acquire state change lock' messages suggest a locking bug or severe contention at least. To help me better understand the problem I have a few questions about your setup. >From your earlier report it appears that you have 15 VMs running on the
2014 Jul 03
1
recording in mp3
Can you explain? Sent from Samsung Mobile <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Tiago Geada <tiago.geada at gmail.com> </div><div>Date:03/07/2014 9:04 PM (GMT+02:00) </div><div>To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users at lists.digium.com> </div><div>Subject: Re:
2015 Jun 11
0
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
We are still having this problem and we can not figure out what to do, i sent the logs already as download, can i do anything else to help ? On 04/06/15 17:08, "Soeren Malchow" <soeren.malchow@mcon.net> wrote: >Hi, > >I would send those, but unfortunately we did not think about the journals >getting deleted after a reboot. > >I just made the journals
2018 Aug 24
3
Samba fileserver member corrupt smb.ldb after joining 4.8.4 Samba DC
Hi again, I think I found out something interesting: When running "ntacl get" with debug = 10, I get the following output on the machine where it works: posix_get_nt_acl: called for file /srv/profiles/ Opening cache file at /var/cache/samba/gencache.tdb Opening cache file at /var/run/samba/gencache_notrans.tdb uid 0 -> sid S-1-22-1-0 <12210> gid 100513 -> sid
2018 Mar 27
2
Share users across domains
And how can I use these gpos?  I need to configure a gpo that pevent student login in each administrative machine?  Citando Waishon <waishon009 at gmail.com>: > Hi, >   > I would use one domain and some groups. So you put your Students > in the "students" group and the administratives in the "admin". >   > Then simply create two OUs, one for
2015 Jun 04
0
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
On 04/06/15 13:08 +0000, Soeren Malchow wrote: >Hi Adam, Hi Eric, > >We had this issue again a few minutes ago. > >One machine went down exactly the same way as described, the machine had >only one snapshot and it was the only snapshot that was removed, before >that in the same scriptrun we deleted the snapshots of 15 other Vms, some >without, some with 1 and some with
2018 Aug 24
2
Samba fileserver member corrupt smb.ldb after joining 4.8.4 Samba DC
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 22:06:01 +0200 Waishon <waishon009 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for your suggestions. Do you think this is causes the > stacktrace above? . I just added "REALM" as a placeholder and it > worked on a DC that was provisioned using Samba 4.7.3 and upgraded > afterwards to Samba 4.8.4 absolutely fine with this config and the > command
2018 Aug 25
2
Samba fileserver member corrupt smb.ldb after joining 4.8.4 Samba DC
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 23:53:14 +0200 Waishon <waishon009 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again, > > sorry for spaming ;) > > wbinfo -U shows on the second machine only: > root at FS/# wbinfo -U 0 > failed to call wbcUidToSid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND > Could not convert uid 0 to sid > > On the other machine it returns the correct SID. > > Maybe that's a
2015 Jun 04
2
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Hi, I would send those, but unfortunately we did not think about the journals getting deleted after a reboot. I just made the journals persistent on the servers, we are trying to trigger the error again last time we only got half way through the VM’s when removing the snapshots so we have a good chance that it comes up again. Also the libvirt logs to the journal not to libvirtd.log, i would
2019 Sep 04
1
Winbind group mapping
Hey there, currently I'm trying to map my users and groups using winbind on a samba fileserver member server which is connected to a samba DC. Both are running version 4.10.0 from the 19.04 ubuntu repository. Here's my samba member servers smb.conf: [global] security = ADS workgroup = SAMDOM realm = SAMDOM.DOMAIN:TLD log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log log level = 1 server min protocol =
2015 Jun 04
2
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Hi Adam, Hi Eric, We had this issue again a few minutes ago. One machine went down exactly the same way as described, the machine had only one snapshot and it was the only snapshot that was removed, before that in the same scriptrun we deleted the snapshots of 15 other Vms, some without, some with 1 and some with several snapshots. Can i provide anything from the logs that helps ? Regards
2008 May 10
1
(PR#11281) Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed
You will see the current code is different, and your 'fix' is not needed nor applies in R-devel. You failed to provide an example to reproduce the alleged bug, but the issue does seem to be using lines beyond the documented line length. So it would have only affected people who did that .... And generating a new report (PR#11438) was distinctly unfriendly. If after studing the R FAQ
2015 May 31
4
Re: [ovirt-users] Bug in Snapshot Removing
Small addition again: This error shows up in the log while removing snapshots WITHOUT rendering the Vms unresponsive — Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net libvirtd[1657]: Timed out during operation: cannot acquire state change lock Jun 01 01:33:45 mc-dc3ham-compute-02-live.mc.mcon.net vdsm[6839]: vdsm vm.Vm ERROR vmId=`56848f4a-cd73-4eda-bf79-7eb80ae569a9`::Error getting block
2008 May 13
2
(PR#11281) Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!)
>>>>> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> >>>>> on Tue, 13 May 2008 07:32:43 +0100 (BST) writes: BDR> This example does not crash in R 2.7.0, R-patched nor BDR> R-devel (r45677) for me (x86_64 F8 Linux.) It also BDR> does not crash with the CRAN build of R 2.7.0 on BDR> Windows XP. Neither does it
2008 May 13
0
Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11456)
On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 11:10 +0200, maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch wrote: > Hi Soeren, > >>>>> "SS" == Soeren Sonnenburg <bugreports at nn7.de> > >>>>> on Sat, 10 May 2008 05:32:14 +0000 writes: > > SS> On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > >> bugreports at nn7.de wrote: > OK, I am just
2018 Mar 27
0
Share users across domains
Hello Rodrigo, I would create one Domain and put your students into one group. Then you create a OU (Organizational Unit) for the admin computers and put all the admin computers into that OU. After that you create a gpo in the OU that contains all your admin computers. In this gpo you can deny login for the students group as describe on the following site
2008 May 10
0
Bug in R 2.7 for over long lines (crasher+proposed fix!) (PR#11438)
On Sat, 2008-04-26 at 09:38 +0200, Peter Dalgaard wrote: > bugreports at nn7.de wrote: > > OK, I am just sending it here too as it looks like r-devel at r-project.org > > is not the right place: > > > I think it was seen there too, just that noone got around to reply. In > R-bugs, there's a filing system so that it won't be completely forgotten... Looks like