similar to: samba-tool drs showrepl dont list all Dcs

Hi! I tested shutdown in server samba-dc101, but samba-dc102 e samba-dc103 dont replication each other. I wait for more 10 minutes!! In logs dont see information try connection. samba-dc102 <-> samba-dc103 It is problem..... Any Ideia ? Regards; On 23-03-2018 11:43, Carlos wrote: > > Hi! > > Thanks for answer ! > > This caught my attention, because in other

On 3/23/2018 9:56 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: > Hi! > > Any Ideia ? > > Regards; > > > On 22-03-2018 14:09, Carlos wrote: >> >> Hi!! >> >> I have 3 Dcs, all system and configuration equal. >> >> samba-dc101(FSMO) >> >> samba-dc102 >> >> samba-dc103 >> >> But, then i executed command samba-tool drs

Hi! DC101 and DC102 same network . DC103 other network. DC101 and DC102 same site DC103 other site. I wil shutdonw DC101 for 20 minutes for te teste. Regards; On 23-03-2018 12:58, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/23/2018 11:29 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I tested shutdown in server samba-dc101, but samba-dc102 e >> samba-dc103 dont replication each

On 3/23/2018 11:29 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: > Hi! > > I tested shutdown in server samba-dc101, but samba-dc102 e samba-dc103 > dont replication each other. > > I wait for more 10 minutes!! > > In logs dont see information try connection. > > > samba-dc102 <-> samba-dc103 > > > It is problem..... > > Any Ideia ? > > > Regards; >

Hi! Thanks for answer ! This caught my attention, because in other Sambas (older, it all appears). So when the DC101 drops(off-line) the DC12 and DC103 will replicate? Regards; On 23-03-2018 11:17, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > On 3/23/2018 9:56 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Any Ideia ? >> >> Regards; >> >> >> On 22-03-2018

Hi!! I have 3 Dcs, all system and configuration equal. samba-dc101(FSMO) samba-dc102 samba-dc103 But, then i executed command samba-tool drs showrepl  in  dcs server: samba-dc101(FSMO) -> List 2 Dcs 102 and 103(for me is ok) samba-dc102 -> List only Dc 101 samba-dc102 -> List only Dc 101 samba -V Version 4.7.3 (Compiled by me) S.O : lsb_release -a No LSB modules are

Hi! I have 3 Samba 4 , version 4.7.3 running in Ubuntu Server 16.04. All is ok, but GPO in DC3, with erro the permission, with dont load in windows(gpresult /force). My smb.conf all samba server DC. [global]         netbios name = SAMBA-DC103         realm = <DOMAIN>         server role = active directory domain controller         server services = s3fs, rpc, nbt, wrepl, ldap,

Hi Carlos, > > DC to DC2/DC3 -> > > /usr/bin/rsync -XAaz --delete-after /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol > root at samba-dc102:/opt/samba/var/locks/ > > /usr/bin/rsync -XAaz --delete-after /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol > root at samba-dc102:/opt/samba/var/locks/ looking at your smb.conf file, you are using tdb idmap (default on DC). So the UID/SID mapping will be

Hello, copying idmap is fairly straightforward. 1) on your first DC (that one that has PDC FSMO, and is the source for rsync) create backup of idmap.ldb tdbbackup -s .bak /path/to/samba/private/idmap.ldb it will create idmap.ldb.bak 2) stop samba service on second DC 3) copy idmap.ldb.bak from first dc to second dc, lose the .bak suffix and just copy it over idmap.ldb on second dc 4)

Hello! After process, error continue...... ---------------------------------------------------------------- C: \ Users \ USER1XXX> gpupdate / force Updating Policy ... Unable to update user policy successfully. The following errors for found: Group Policy was not processed. Windows was unable to apply the settings registry-based policy for the LDAP Group Policy object LDAP://CN

HI Rsync DC1 to DC2 / DC3 root / usr / bin / rsync -XAaz --delete-after / opt / samba / var / locks / sysvol root @ DCXX: / opt / samba / var / Run Windows "gpupdate / force", information error permission (show ID GPO, any gpos ...). Yes, the only gpo, with errors. Regards; On 10-01-2018 14:29, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > On 1/10/2018 8:59 AM, Carlos via samba wrote:

Every 5 minutes. This moment(before sysvolreset,) machine is ok . This comend is valid now ? *In DC01 Problem does not exist with sysvol. Regards; On 10-01-2018 14:51, lingpanda101 via samba wrote: > On 1/10/2018 11:42 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: >> HI >> >> Rsync >> >> DC1 to DC2 / DC3 >> >> root / usr / bin / rsync -XAaz --delete-after / opt /

On 1/11/2018 10:45 AM, Carlos via samba wrote: > Hi > > Any ? > > Regards; > > > On 10-01-2018 15:11, Carlos wrote: >> >> Every 5 minutes. >> >> This moment(before sysvolreset,) machine is ok . This comend is valid >> now ? >> >> *In DC01 Problem does not exist with sysvol. >> >> Regards; >> >> >>

Hi, how do I do that ? And what would be the possible problems? (Both are in production) "One way to avoid that would be to copy idmap.ldb from your first DC to the other two DCs." Regards; On 11-01-2018 14:42, Denis Cardon wrote: > Hi Carlos, >> >> DC to DC2/DC3 -> >> >>  /usr/bin/rsync  -XAaz --delete-after /opt/samba/var/locks/sysvol >> root

Hello! I'll try that. Done with result. Regards, On 11-01-2018 20:45, Kacper Wirski via samba wrote: > Hello, > > copying idmap is fairly straightforward. > > 1) on your first DC (that one that has PDC FSMO, and is the source for > rsync) create backup of idmap.ldb > > tdbbackup -s .bak /path/to/samba/private/idmap.ldb > > it will create idmap.ldb.bak >

Hello, Wile getting this error, can You navigate to this folder via File Explorer in Windows or are You getting access denied error there? Also check which DC was used as logonserver, then check on this DC acl on this policy with "getfacl" and compare output of "getfacl" on the same policy, but on Your DC with PDC FSMO (the one that is the "source" for rsync

2016-04-04 14:20 GMT+02:00 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > On 04/04/16 10:23, mathias dufresne wrote: > >> SOA means "this DNS se'rver can modify the zone". >> > > No it doesn't, it stands for 'Start Of Authority' and contains who to > contact for the domain records. > Rowland... thank you again Captain Obvious. Yes SOA means

Hello! I used: samba -V Version 4.3.11-Ubuntu lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS Release: 16.04 Codename: xenial I want hide directorio "lost+found" , but option hide files dont work. [BACKUP] path = /mnt/backup browseable = yes writeable = yes printable = no

Hi! In Option "Inter-Site Transports", i have only  one the name "DEFAULTIPSITELINK" , in properties Sites in this link: Matriz Filial Matriz -> site with DC1 and DC2 Filail ->  site With DC3 Regards; On 17-05-2018 13:12, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 5/17/2018 12:07 PM, Carlos wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Thanks for answer. >> >> But, i allowed

Hi, I've got a relatively simple tinc setup. I've got two "servers" that are on the public internet that act as routers for three "clients" that are behind NATs. Those servers are called aaaaa and bbbbb the clients are xxxxx, yyyyy and zzzzz Unfortunatly the servers have problems accepting a connection from the clients syslog on aaaaa: Sep 29 18:28:58 schuerrer