similar to: mapping sid to uid in member server

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "mapping sid to uid in member server"

2010 Feb 22
1
counting repeating sequence lengths in a vector
Hello, I have a very long (~50,000) sequence of repeating numbers. The first 100 are: [1] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 429 [13] 429 429 429 429 429 429 429 858 858 858 858 858 [25] 858 1287 1287 1287 1287 1287 1716 2145 2145 2574 2574 3003 [37] 3003 3432 3432 3861 4290 4719 5148 5577 5577 6006 6006
2010 Nov 08
7
winbind sometimes does not resolve sid to a name
Sometimes a group sid does not get resolved to its name. Is this a settings problem? Looks like winbind deamon went dormant for a while and then woke up? I am using interface wbcLookupSid provided by the library libwbclient.so for resolving sids to names. These are the winbind related parameters in /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] # separate domain and username with '\', like
2016 May 26
3
pjsip segfault problem
hi, after switch from 13.7 + pjproject 2.4.5 to 13.9.1 pjproject bundled i have problem with segfault (centos 6) Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0xb7665695 in check_cached_response (sess=0xafbd688c, packet=0xb07676d8, pkt_size=132, options=1, token=0xafecc2bc, parsed_len=0x0, src_addr=0xb0e47a20, src_addr_len=16) at ../src/pjnath/stun_session.c:1287 1287
2018 May 14
5
migrating NT-style domain SID-error
Hello, after migrating a samba NT-style domain from Samba 4.2.14-debian (debian 8.10) to samba 4.5.12-debian (debian 9.4) We copied all tdb-files to the new machine plus the smb.conf plus /etc/group. The old Samba has tdbsam as backend. we use the same domain and hostname on the new DC as it was set on the old system. We are using bind9 as DNS-backend in the new system. The "samba-tool
2007 Feb 19
2
[Bug 1287] Use getpeerucred on Solaris
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287 Summary: Use getpeerucred on Solaris Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: v4.5p1 Platform: All URL: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openssh-unix- dev&m=115919880516907&w=2 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: normal
2018 May 25
2
syscolcheck error / Could not convert sid S-1-5-32-544 to uid
Hello, this is a Samba AD Domain upgraded from Samba 3.x with classicupgrade. Debian 9.4 Samba: 4.7.6 (packages from tranquil.it) # cat /etc/samba/smb.conf [global] netbios name = DC1 realm = IWW.LAN server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = IWW idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes dns forwarder = 172.16.1.12 dsdb:schema update
2018 Nov 02
1
[Bug 1287] New: rule for 0.0.0.0/8 is added as 0.0.0.0/0
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287 Bug ID: 1287 Summary: rule for 0.0.0.0/8 is added as 0.0.0.0/0 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee:
2020 Aug 28
1
samba
Hello, Thank you everyone in advance for your time and support? I am the Administrator of a small network, with about 60 desktops (mostly windows 10) that connect to a Linux VM running samba for file sharing).? In the last few months I completed the transition from the Samba server running as a vm on an OpenVZ machine.? It was running Centos 6, with an older version of samba.? Now the server has
2006 Mar 20
4
Capistrano: cap show_tasks working but rake show_tasks not?
Does it make sense that if I type cap show_tasks it works but when I type rake show_tasks I get: rake aborted! Don''t know how to build task ''show_tasks'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.0/lib/rake.rb:1287:in `[]'' /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.7.0/lib/rake.rb:300:in `[]''
2007 May 09
1
[Bug 1287] Use getpeerucred on Solaris
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1287 bugzilla-openssh at thewrittenword.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Comment #2 from bugzilla-openssh at
2005 Oct 18
2
Fwd: {100-1287} RE: DID"s
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: "Sales Support" <sales@sellvoip.net> Subject: {100-1287} RE: DID"s Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 11:04:09 GMT Size: 1774 Url: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20051018/7221e0af/attachment.eml
2008 Mar 06
2
Help with parsing a data file
Hi All, I need to parse data from a file, example shown below. The first two lines can be skipped, the third line contains the column names. The next 13 lines can be skipped. The next line "1991" is a year value, with the following 13 values data for that year. The file then repeats this format with (year, 13 lines of data for that year). I would ideally like to end up with an
2006 Jun 20
2
Problem with "can''t dump anonymous class Class"
I submitted this earlier, but the web forums went down and I''ve screwed up the thread, so I''m starting over. I''m trying to built a document upload system. The system has a main Document model with different subclasses for different types of documents. With the code below, if I attempt to create a Document, it works fine, but if I attempt to use one of the subclasses, I
2010 Feb 08
3
High codec translation times on x64
Hi Users, I was wondering if someone of you have the same thing on CentOS 64x? asterisk01*CLI> core show translation Translation times between formats (in microseconds) for one second of data Source Format (Rows) Destination Format (Columns) g723 gsm ulaw alaw g726aal2 adpcm slin lpc10 g729 speex ilbc g726 g722 siren7 siren14 slin16 g723
2010 Mar 10
1
dtmf payload 100
Hello, I encountered the dtmf problem between my asterisk box (1.4.23) and suppliers gateway (unknown vendor). I have dtmf mode set to rfc2833 and it alway worked till supplier has changed something. Now I receive from him dtmf payload 100. With the second supplier which sends dtmf with payload type 101 everything works. in cli I get this message as dtmf is entered rtp.c:1287 ast_rtp_read:
2010 Mar 17
1
[LLVMdev] is structtyp a firstclass typ?
Hi LLVM, In lib/VMCare/Verifier.cpp::visitInstruction, we have such code 1287 // Check that the return value of the instruction is either void or a legal 1288 // value type. 1289 Assert1(I.getType() == Type::getVoidTy(I.getContext()) || 1290 I.getType()->isFirstClassType() 1291 || ((isa<CallInst>(I) || isa<InvokeInst>(I)) 1292 &&
2009 Apr 29
1
How do I sample "cases" within a matrix?
Hi R community, I am trying to obtain a sample from a matrix but sample(my.matrix) doesn't do what I need. I have a matrix of 1287 interactions between the species in columns and the species in rows and I want to obtain a smaller matrix with say, 800 interactions, that may or may not have the same number of columns and/or rows (i.e., some interactions may not be retrieved in a smaller sample).
2017 Sep 06
3
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
I do think its a classic upgrade from 3.x to 4.x that causes this. And the samba 3 was a samba with smbldap-tools or configured with something like : net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadm rid=512 type=d ( as shown here https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html ) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba
2017 Sep 06
0
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:24:08 +0200 Jiří Černý via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thank you again, Rowland, for your time. > I think that different ID ranges in my domain is ok, at lest we will > survive it, Is it desired behavior, as I assume, that getent group > cannot list Domain Admins (and other groups) without setting UNIX GID. > GPO processing is now ok, at
2017 Sep 06
0
BUILTIN\Administrators - failed to call wbcSidToUid: WBC_ERR_DOMAIN_NOT_FOUND
Ah, so you did find a bug in the classic upgrade :-) great, one less in the future samba ;-) One extra to remember. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 september 2017 16:40 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba]