similar to: Replication Failure Issue

Thanks Carlos, The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > I have same problem after update for samba. > I allow new ports in firewall. > >

On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: > Thanks Carlos, > > The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only updated the OS. > > >> On 21/03/2018, at 10:04 PM, Carlos Alberto Panozzo Cunha <carlos.hollow at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have same problem

Hai, Very important things are missing here in this one.. smb.conf Samba from sources or os provided? In case of last, centos 7.1 to 7.4 is samba 4.1.12 to 4.6.2 https://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS7 Various packages have been rebased. Some of those are openLDAP, samba, .... And yes, as Carlos suggested, do check your firewalling also. Maybe samba didnt change but

G'day All, Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all together. On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >> Thanks Carlos, >> >> The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is >> the next step, so the ports used would not have changed. I only >> updated the OS.

G'day All, I've been setting up a new set of DCs, using 4.2.3 and all was going well until I tried to get a 4th DC going. I'm using bind_DLZ, and I think this is where I went wrong. I provisioned the new DC before having set up bind properly (I forgot to "yum install bind bind-util bind-libs") before hand. The provision worked okay, except that it told me

On 24/03/18 01:35, lingpanda101 wrote: > On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: >> G'day All, >> >>     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all >> together. >> >> On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >>> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >>>> Thanks Carlos, >>>>

G'day All, I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. See below for named.conf. I'm having two issues. 1) After bind first starts up

G'day All, We are trying to set up SCCM-5.0. Our AD test is Samba-4.8.5. SCCM requires schema changes, and Samba is rejecting these. Anyone tackled this? Ideas on how to proceed? The output thrown by the SCCM exe (extadsch.exe) is: Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager v5.00 (Build 8634) Copyright (C) 2011 Microsoft Corp. Failed to extend the Active Directory schema. Your

Hi , Thank you for your input. I have had tried all of the escape characters you have have tested with but I have had no luck with them. I am curious to know which versions of net have you been tested with? I do agree that the best practice for this is to remove "-" from the beginning of the object name, However, seeing that it can be created that way allowed, I would like to find a

On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: > I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is running smbd and winbindd. > > I've followed the wiki and for the most part it's working. However, after stuffing up the ranges, then fixing them up, when I create new accounts, adding all the

> > On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >> >>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>> running smbd and winbindd. >>> >>> I've followed the wiki and for the most part

I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is running smbd and winbindd. I've followed the wiki and for the most part it's working. However, after stuffing up the ranges, then fixing them up, when I create new accounts, adding all the Unix attributes, the UID_Number is not showing the correct value

On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > >     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all > together. > > On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David Minard via samba wrote: >>> Thanks Carlos, >>> >>> The thing is, that I did not upgrade the version of Samba - that is >>>

On 3/25/2018 8:54 PM, David Minard wrote: > > > On 24/03/18 01:35, lingpanda101 wrote: >> On 3/22/2018 8:06 PM, David Minard wrote: >>> G'day All, >>> >>>     Will replay to all messages so far in this one to keep it all >>> together. >>> >>> On 21/03/18 22:52, lingpanda101 wrote: >>>> On 3/21/2018 7:32 AM, David

Thank you Felix. On 02/07/15 16:18, Felix Matouschek wrote: > Hi David, > > I experienced this issue as well, it's currently a limitation of Samba 4.2.2. > Samba 4.2.2 DCs do not support pulling home directories and login shells from AD via rfc2307. > > I solved this issue with the "template homedir" and "template shell" directives. > You lose some

On 27/10/15 03:57, David Minard wrote: > G'day All, > > I'm running up Samba4.2.3 with 4 DCs on Centos7. There are no > changes to the default smb.conf file that gets created at provision/DC > join. "samba-tool drs showrepl" show all DC replicating in and out. > "samba-tool dbcheck" shows no errors. > > See below for named.conf.

On 25/06/15 13:44, David Minard wrote: >> On 24/06/15 02:55, David Minard wrote: >>> On 23/06/15 13:32, David Minard wrote: >>> >>>> I've Set up a DC and a Member Server for a file server. Both are >>>> running on Centos7 and samba version 4.2.2. The Member Server is >>>> running smbd and winbindd.

G'day All, We are trying to raise the level of our test samba4 DCs. Our windows dude wants the Domain level to be 2012_R2. I am referencing: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Raising_the_Functional_Levels#Supported_Functional_Levels We managed to get both domain and forest levels to 2008 R2 - forest was 2003. However, when we try to raise further, we are getting what seems to be a

G'day All, I am not sure if this is the right place to ask, but here goes. Back ground: The Uni I work at runs their corporate MS AD. I work in the School of Computing, and we've set up our own AD (Samba4), and have it tailored to suite our needs. We manage our own accounts separately from the corporate accounts. However, our dean wants "single-sign on". From his

G'day Rowland, > On 29/09/15 15:30, David Minard wrote: >> I'm working on a brand new set of Samba DCs, as our University changed it's domain name, so we thought we'd start from scratch. Working on 4.2.3 at the moment. >> >> I finally got the new DC to join, but I had to wait until things got quiet (midnight-ish). >> >> > Getting confused now,