similar to: power users group

Hi Lorenzo, > I just installed a samba4 dc and I see that Power Users group is missing, > is possible to create that group so that a workstation joined in the > domain can install software using users belonging to that group and how > it can be done? > > actually simply creating a group with that name doesn't get any > privilege to that group users. PowerUsers group is a

Hello Folks, We're using Samba as AD servers along with Windows AD Servers (2008R2 FL). We also use SCCM (Current Branch) that is dependent on AD for lab deployments (Windows 10). Currently, SCCM (current branch) supports 2008R2 FL, but for how long??? Samba does not support 2012R2, 2016, 2019 FL. We'd like to remove the Windows Servers from our AD infrastructure, but would also like

thanks for suggestion, in other words you use only ACLs for users denying all for groups, unfortunately we had many group such as domain users, secretary, finance, etc belonging to users for which we need to apply at least 770 in order to gain a simplified permission management using groups the actual dirty workaround I applied was to track new files/dir by tailing with follow ( tail -f ) a

Hai, In a bit testing with software deployment through GPO. ? Now i noticed te following. If i setup my software source somewhere on the sysvol share ( and probely any other share on the DC) then i can deploy the software with computer and user GPO setting. Aka works ok good all settings with software deployment. ? Now i noticed the following. I did setup a share on a member server the AD

Hi Elias, > I thought it worked, but after I uninstalled the software that I deployed > via user scope, it did not reinstall. I selected the "Redeploy application" > option, but it also did not work. The user scope GPO are run with the privileges and access tokens of the logged on user, so the user have local admin rights for install and need access rights to the share you

Hi, Just wondering: What are you guys using to deploy software on your windows (7) workstations within the samba4 AD? These are options I know of: * wpkg (but it seems it's development is not too active) * wpkg-gp using the group policies * www.opsi.org (Client Management System for Windows clients) * standard windows software deployment, but I think that's msi-only This page also has

Hi Friends, I am trying to write a shell script which can merge the 2 columns into 3rd one on Centos 5. The file is very long around 31200 rows having around 1370 unique groups and around 12000 unique user-names. The 1st column is the groupname and then 2nd column is the user-name. 1st Column (Groupname) 2nd Column (username) admin ankush

Hey Luke, thanks for the help!!! It's working now!!! God bless you and your family!! :D Remember that GPOs need to run as the context of either the computer or the > user. Computers typically do not have access to many folders on a file > server, even as "Everyone". That is why the NETLOGON folder works. > > If you're deploying as a USER configuration, then it

If you log in you will be a Windows 2000 standard user. Some applications need to run as poweruser. How can I configure samba to log in certain users as powerusers? Volker

Hello everyone, I have setup Samba 3.0.28a on an Ubuntu 8.04 server. The setup that I am working with is an exact copy (as far as I can tell) if an identical installation that I did on a test box. Kerberos is setup and working properly. I can use kinit to issue tickets. The box has been successfully joined to the Active Directory domain. I can enumerate AD users and groups. I can log

Spike White, Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2014 4:32 AM > > Luke, I have considerable experience with this. We use WDS at work > for PXE (MS-centric shop). I use pxelinux at home. > > I've got WDS working in our test lab w/ UEFI. As you state, it strongly > wishes to do proxyDHCP (port 4011). More on this in a bit. > > It's quite common to segregate the DHCP

On 03/09/2020 20:57, Peter Pollock wrote: > Ubuntu 20.4 and whatever Samba it installs (sorry, I'm not in front?of > the server right now). 4.11. x if I remember correctly, so okay to start with, but can I introduce to Louis Van Belle's repo: http://apt.van-belle.nl/ Once you get up and running, you can use the packages there to keep current. > > Bind 9.16 (although there

> Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2014 07:07:52 +0000 > From: Luke Ledgerd <luke.ledgerd at niteco.se> > To: "syslinux at zytor.com" <syslinux at zytor.com> > Subject: [syslinux] Chain-loading from WDS to PXELinux on a different > tftp server > Message-ID: <17ba7ad419d54b6cab685c2cedc3de95 at NI-MAILEX.niteco.se> > Content-Type: text/plain;

This got me closer, but it got to "Encapsulating winpe.wim..." and never went through the rest of the way. Ultimately PXELINUX apparently timed out and the machine rebooted. Here is relative portion of pxelinux: LABEL SCCM OSD Boot MENU LABEL ^2. SCCM OSD Boot com32 linux.c32 append wimboot initrdfile=bootmgr.exe,BCD,boot.sdi,winpe.wim TEXT HELP

> > > > OK, you are using the winbind 'rid' backend, so it is okay to use > 'Domain Admins', so start again and follow that wikipage: > > Ensure you have the 'acl' & 'attr' packages installed (this is what they > are called on Debian based distros) > They are installed. I built the server using the walk through you gave me. >

On 28/08/14 19:38, Jason Jones wrote: > Anyone have luck with pxechn32 and bootmgfw.efi? > > I'm getting the "Unable to retrieve first package" issue as reported by others. > > Really, any advice for UEFI booting into a winpe environment off of pxelinux 6.03 would be beneficial. As it happens, I released a new version of wimboot with support for UEFI yesterday. The

Thanks for your email. Yes it does provide some insight into why I could hack a Linux DHCP server into providing enough PXE boot information for PXE 3 clients but PXE 2.1 were happy (ROMs under many circumstances need to use proxy dhcp 4011 - as documented by IBM on the link I shared earlier). It appears only the most latest Dell business systems have EFI 64 support, and the best you can expect

Thank you everyone for your help. I corrected my resolv.conf files as Peter Milesson suggested and then had to take a number of extra steps so now things are looking a little better. In case it helps anyone else in the future, here's what I found (plus I am now having problems resolving internal addresses). As far as I can see, the setup on both servers is identical (except they use their own

G'day All, We are trying to set up SCCM-5.0. Our AD test is Samba-4.8.5. SCCM requires schema changes, and Samba is rejecting these. Anyone tackled this? Ideas on how to proceed? The output thrown by the SCCM exe (extadsch.exe) is: Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager v5.00 (Build 8634) Copyright (C) 2011 Microsoft Corp. Failed to extend the Active Directory schema. Your

> Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 13:02:10 +0100 > From: Michael Brown <mcb30 at ipxe.org> > To: Jason Jones <jason.s.jones at convergys.com>, "syslinux at zytor.com" > <syslinux at zytor.com> > Subject: Re: [syslinux] PXE booting WinPE with UEFI architecture > Message-ID: <54006BC2.3090703 at ipxe.org> > Content-Type: text/plain;