similar to: wbinfo -i output different before 1st authentication

Dear all, on CentOs7 based linux w. different versions of Samba (4.6.x from CentOS repos, but also Sernet-Samba-4.7.4 and also compiled from source), "wbinfo -i user at domain.tld" returns different results before the first successful authentication of the user. Server joined as member to Active Directory, idmapping via tdb2. On first attempt, the result returns

On 18/04/16 12:52, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > Ok. I've done the following, any samba dev, please read below. > > Looks to me some bug in librpc/ndr/ndr.c > > But im not a coder.. so please have a look. > > > > > > Environment. > > Debian Jessie, samba 4.2.10 (debian) > > > > I remove my proxy2 server from the domain, cleared up the AD.

?Bump. Can someone from dovecot dev team please respond something to my problem ? I've provided all the possible information, and if not please tell me. Or do you only provide support for your own FTS solution bundled with the paid version of dovecot-pro ? If so, you should clearly state it in the wiki. Thanks Le 19/04/2018 ? 10:30, kadafax at gmail.com a ?crit?: > I think I'm

Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: > That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual > user. > > How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated > automatically? I send an email containing a specific strings ('thahB8ea' in that case) and search agains it: # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body thahB8ea --> No

can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Aki On 21.05.2018 13:31, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: >> That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual >> user. >> >> How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated >> automatically? > I send an

I think I'm progressing: if I create a brand new user, send her an email, it will not be indexed right away. I need to doveadm rescan / index the Inbox before. At the end of this email, a dovecot's debug log snipset (grep'ed on this user). In it I can read: "Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace '' Can this be a problem ? Thanks doveconf -n output: # 2.2.34

That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual user. How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated automatically? Aki On 04.05.2018 12:47, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > ?Bump. Can someone from dovecot dev team please respond something to my > problem ? I've provided all the possible information, and if not please > tell me. > Or do

Hello, I am trying to make a small server around the team that we experiment together. I gave permission to read to all users and i gave permissions to write only to some of them, dependent on the folder. Folders are in second HD that is auto mounted at boot through fstab. All folders and sub folders have permission to read and write changed to user , group , other. users : me, harald, heiner

Heiner Schwarte has helped me with the AIX problem that I and Janusz Kawczak recently reported here. Heiner had found out earlier that there was a problem with the 'finite' c-library function [Heiner's test code see below] when gcc (and older versions of xlc) is used. He also found that instead, AIX defines a FINITE(.) macro itself in fp.h and that this would work in any case.

Help! I have been using dovecot for some years with great success. A little while ago, I changed my mail server from Fedora to CentOS linux. I reinstalled dovecot, and *almost* everything seems to be working, but one thing. There's *one* user I can't get it to work on without a workaround. The user is "newuser" and the uid is 1111 (actual name and number changed to protect

Ok. I've done the following, any samba dev, please read below. Looks to me some bug in librpc/ndr/ndr.c But im not a coder.. so please have a look.     Environment. Debian Jessie, samba 4.2.10 (debian)   I remove my proxy2 server from the domain, cleared up the AD. Removed all content from /var/(lib/cache)/samba Removed all other unnneeded services for this test. Removed all

I have two instances of an openldap-2.4.39 server running with syncrepl in a master-master replication setup. These are Centos 7.1 test servers which have been running for over 2 months now with no problems. Partly the good behavior of the LDAP servers is due to very little exercise. Yesterday I decided to try and see exactly how well replication was working. With server-2 up and running I

I am running Samba version 3.0.9-1.3E.2 on a server that is joined to a windows server 2003 domain using ADS security. The samba server hosts a share called 'files'. I am having problems mounting this share using a new account I set up. getent passwd shows the information for the new account as does wbinfo -u. Mounting the share with the new users account using the net use command

After upgrading to 3.4.0, I can no longer add new users. Any users that were added beforehand work fine. Any users that I attempt to create cannot login (error: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE). I was able to get one new user account to work (see below), but I cannot add any new users. The server is Ubuntu 9.10 running Samba 3.4.0. I am using: security = user pam password change = yes Updating

Hi Rowland, Yes, thats done, the domain user exist on both servers in local sudo group. But why do i see much more groups on the ADDC, and even groups where this user is NOT member of, like 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group). See .. 2x 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group 3000005(NTDOMAIN\denied rodc password replication group Greetz, Louis >

> > I love diving : ) > Ok mathias, Can you explain this. This i dont get.... Why is this output so different, and i dont mean the difference with NTDOMAIN\.. See the groups differences... between a ADDC and a member server.. Samba 4.4.3 ADDC id someusername uid=10002(NTDOMAIN\someusername) gid=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain users) groups=10000(NTDOMAIN\domain

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here is a description of what I am trying to do (with Samba 3.0.2a & openldap 2.1.27): I have all my users populated into the LDAP with all the applicable attributes; Users can map drives to a server using LDAP as the authentication backend without issue. Where I am running into problems is bringing up a PDC using Samba w/LDAP. * I added

On 21/10/15 17:37, Ole Traupe wrote: > I think I finally managed to understand the [homes] part of the man > pages, and what my problem is: > https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages/smb.conf.5.html > > The misunderstanding comes from my practice I learned on Windows to > just share the "\\server\home" directory and to create per-user > sub-folders

Well, I do. That is not the problem. The problem was that I wasn't used to have user homes to be shares themselves. And when I share \\server\home and want to have the folder \\server\home\newuser to be auto-created, but I actually connect to the share [home] (\\server\home), this section in the smb.conf is always found and so the special [homes] section is never executed (cloned).

Hello, I have a samba server (old - running FC6, samba 3.0.24-11.fc6) that authenticates against AD. This is all configured and has been working fine until this week. A new user has been added to AD, but cannot access the samba drives. All other users can still access samba as normal. net ads testjoin reports OK. wbinfo -a newuser%pass and wbinfo -K newuser%pass both succeed. wbinfo -r