similar to: Samba, AD and devices compatibility...

On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Thanks! > > Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction > printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. > >

to my knowlidge, konica = xerox. and this works fine imo but im not able to look this up now. i did have xerox connected to my ldapS addc’s. i can check this monday. Greetz, Louis > Op 11 mei 2018 om 04:09 heeft Andrew Bartlett via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 15:48 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: >> Mandi!

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... Ok, i coma back to an old thread, because vendor finally reply. Little fast-rewind: i own some Konica-Minolta BizHub multifunction printers/copiers, and i need to ''bind'' it to my new AD domain. But authentication does not work, seems bacause that printer try to use SASL over plain LDAP (no SSL nor TLS). After

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I think that is what Andrew is trying to tell you, the printer needs to > support SASL over TLS/SSL or it will never work. I don't think there is > anything you can do, but I am surprised that the print doesn't already > support it, after all, it isn't something new ;-) Mi confusion grow. ;-) As stated in my

On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 11:26 +0200, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > > I think that is what Andrew is trying to tell you, the printer needs to > > support SASL over TLS/SSL or it will never work. I don't think there is > > anything you can do, but I am surprised that the print doesn't already >

Dear all, I have a bit of a complicated tinc setup yielding weird results that I cannot explain. I would be glad if maybe someone here could help me out. I have 3 machines (with IP addresses in my tinc network) machine A (10.0.0.2) runs gentoo, tinc-1.1_pre17, behind router Y machine B (10.0.0.3) runs gentoo, tinc-1.1pre15, behind router X machine C (10.0.0.1) runs raspbian, tinc-1.1pre15, behind

Hello everybody, I have a problem with LDAP userdb and dovecot. Let me first explain my LDAP configuration: I got three Active Directory LDAP servers (a.galliera.it, b.galliera.it, c.galliera.it) responding round robin to the name galliera.it. I want to use LDAP for the userdb lookup, so I configured dovecot-ldap-userdb.conf.ext as follow: hosts = galliera.it # round robin base =

Hi. I upgrade samba-ad-dc 4.12.6 to 4.13.2. I use GoogleWifiAP, it sometime access SambaAD-DC internal DNS by TCP protocol. Since recently, I troubled More and more connections without closing. TCPDUMPed(and wireshark) > No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info > 23 2020-11-10 19:21:40.775442 [GoogleWifiAP] [SambaAD-DC] TCP 74 48861 ? 53 [SYN] Seq=0 Win=29200 Len=0 MSS=1460

Hi, We're encountering a rather weird, sporadic hang during a large-file transfer. A bit of background on the setup: - Host A rsyncs a MySQL database from Host B. Both sides use rsync 3.1.1 on Debian Jessie. - Host B serves the files using rsync --daemon from an ext4 filesystem residing on a thin LVM snapshot. - Host A uses the following command to rsync the files to a btrfs

On 04/07/15 19:22, BALATON Zoltan wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to find out how to pxe boot with syslinux.efi on QEMU with > OVMF. After getting through the initial hurdle caused by the iPXE based > option ROM included with QEMU having a problem as described in these > threads: > > http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-November/022804.html >

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:12 AM, BALATON Zoltan via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to use http from syslinux.efi but it fails while trying to > establish the connection to a FreeBSD http server. A packet capture shows: > > TCP healthd > http [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 TSval=1094 > TSecr=0 > TCP http > healthd

Hello, I'm trying to use http from syslinux.efi but it fails while trying to establish the connection to a FreeBSD http server. A packet capture shows: TCP healthd > http [SYN] Seq=0 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 TSval=1094 TSecr=0 TCP http > healthd [SYN, ACK] Seq=0 Ack=1 Win=65535 Len=0 MSS=1460 WS=64 TSval=1596927428 TSecr=1094 TCP healthd > http [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1 Win=2097152

We get STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER failures when smbclient uses SMB2 but passes with NT1. We do get some success, but mostly failures. It appears to happen after it transfers the PDF file. These are the packets leading up to SMB2 failing after the transfer: No. Time Source Destination Protocol Length Info 266 2015-04-09 08:30:43.688568000

Hello, I'm trying to find out how to pxe boot with syslinux.efi on QEMU with OVMF. After getting through the initial hurdle caused by the iPXE based option ROM included with QEMU having a problem as described in these threads: http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2014-November/022804.html http://sourceforge.net/p/edk2/mailman/message/33236100/ I'm now getting further to almost being able

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > This mean that the printer try to auth in LDAP 'plain' (no SSL, no > > TLS), and so samba refuse that? > No, it means that Samba is refusing to accept a NTLM or Kerberos > authenticated connection without SIGN or SEAL negotiated, as an > attacker could take over an unprotected network connection and do

Hi All, I've tracked this down... We do rate limiting of our vms with a mix of ebtables/tc. Running these commands (replace vif1.0 with the correct vif for your VM) will reproduce this: ebtables -A FORWARD -i vif1.0 -j mark --set-mark 990 --mark-target CONTINUE tc qdisc add dev bond0 root handle 1: htb default 2 tc class add dev bond0 parent 1: classid 1:0 htb rate 10000mbit tc class

Hello Christopher, Am Fri, 3 May 2019 20:06:54 +0200 schrieb "Christopher Klinge" <Christ.Klinge at web.de>: > I did some digging, and thus far I could not find any other culprit other > than tinc itself. The packages that are being sent are addressed directly to > the other tinc hosts on their vpn addresses. During my latest tests, within > about 12 seconds 100MB of

Mandi! Andrew Bartlett via samba In chel di` si favelave... > > There's some way to ''tight'' that configuration , eg permit 'ldap server require strong auth = > > no' only by some hosts? > > Or some other smb.conf options that i've missed? > Nothing at this stage. Ok. > The issue is that they need to do fully signed or sealed Kerberos

Hi, I have no success in using AD with dovecot. The little checkpassword script I cooked up that uses ldapsearch to lookup a user DN (with an authenticated bind) and then ldapsearch with an authenticated bind for that DN again works well. * Approach 1: use a service account to bind to AD, lookup the user DN, and bind to that DN. It fails. The LDAP config looks like: hosts =