similar to: Error running CVE-2018-1057_helper on 4.5

Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2018, 08:35:53 CET schrieb Brian Candler via samba: > I tried to run this script on a system running 4.5.15 built from > source under Ubuntu 16.04, but I get the following exception: > > # PYTHONPATH="/usr/local/samba/lib/python2.7/site-packages/" > ./samba_CVE-2018-1057_helper --lock-pwchange > Temporarily overriding 'dsdb:schema update

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: cpumask:update-irq_desc-to-use-cpumask_var_t.patch Url: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20090107/8ebe5843/attachment.txt

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: cpumask:update-irq_desc-to-use-cpumask_var_t.patch Url: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20090107/8ebe5843/attachment.txt

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: cpumask:update-irq_desc-to-use-cpumask_var_t.patch Url: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20090107/8ebe5843/attachment.txt

I'm quite confused by this one, as I can't see how this would happen.. but after upgrading my DCs from 4.11.10 to 4.18.5, LDAP searches don't seem to work if they use the :1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: modifier, aka LDAP_MATCHING_RULE_IN_CHAIN. (Yes, it was a fairly big version jump.. Yes, I should have upgraded much earlier.. Yes, I know 4.19.x is out now as well) Here's a search that

Hi all, It seems "samba-tool ldapcmp" does not support too much items in Samba's database. Playing for a while with DB I was never able to run ldapcmp successfully. So yesterday I installed a platform to fill piece by piece my two small DCs and to run ldapcmp. The process follows. Test platform: 2 DCs using Debian 8.1 "net install" with only system tools, up to date,

Adam, you already tried my suggestions? What do you see here: > Failed to modify SPNs on CN=SEC-CON03,CN=Computers,DC=domain,DC=com: > acl: spn validation failed for ... ^^^^^^ So read the links below and post your results The event id you showed, for now can be ignored. Inrelevant (for now). And mostlikly wil disapear when you added/fixed the "correct" spn's On

Hi All. Attached is a patch introduces password expiry handling for AIX (other platforms to follow). It is more or less the same as the previous patch but has been updated to reflect recent changes to auth-passwd.c I'm wondering if the AIX parts of auth.c should be moved to port-aix.c and if the generic password change functions (currently at the end of auth-passwd.c) belong in a separate

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1891 Summary: selinux policy does not like to exec passwd from sshd directly Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.8p1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo:

Release Announcements --------------------- These are a security releases in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2017-14746 (Use-after-free vulnerability.) o CVE-2017-15275 (Server heap memory information leak.) ======= Details ======= o CVE-2017-14746: All versions of Samba from 4.0.0 onwards are vulnerable to a use after free vulnerability, where a malicious SMB1 request

Release Announcements --------------------- These are a security releases in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2017-14746 (Use-after-free vulnerability.) o CVE-2017-15275 (Server heap memory information leak.) ======= Details ======= o CVE-2017-14746: All versions of Samba from 4.0.0 onwards are vulnerable to a use after free vulnerability, where a malicious SMB1 request

Hello, I'm running a setup with 3 DCs, all Samba 4.5.12, Debian Stretch (is patched for CVE-2018-1057, "samba_CVE-2018-1057_helper" been used). Probably unrelated to the upgrade and patch for CVE-2018-1057, there's a new problem coming up. RSAT fails to start/connect, complaining about RPC-Server unavailablility. On the DCs I've tried with smbclient and get the following:

seems removing idmap settings from smb.conf on both DCs having them has fixed it. smbclient and ADUC work as expected, now. Thank you! > I'm running a setup with 3 DCs, all Samba 4.5.12, Debian Stretch (is > patched for CVE-2018-1057, "samba_CVE-2018-1057_helper" been used). > > Probably unrelated to the upgrade and patch for CVE-2018-1057, there's > a new

another special situation ;-) old server at customer runs samba-4.5.15 (not that relevant for my questions but while I am at it ...) and is a "classic PDC" -> NT4 based Yes, I know, I should upgrade/migrate that domain to ADS. But that customer basically does not have financial power ;-) and I wait for my money for months every time I write an invoice. So I want to avoid

Shorewall 4.5.15 3 Interface setup em1 p3p1 p4p4 ppp0 Hi, Since changing to NetworkManger on Fedora 18 I can no longer connect to the DSL Modem, which is connected to Interface em1. When the NetworkManger brings up the interfaces and ppp0, it no longer assigns an IP to em1. If I have ppp0 disabled and NetworkManger brings up the interfaces, em1 gets an IP of 192.168.1.2. Then when I get

Op 05-11-2023 om 23:25 schreef Jonathan Hunter via samba: > I'm quite confused by this one, as I can't see how this would happen.. > but after upgrading my DCs from 4.11.10 to 4.18.5, LDAP searches don't > seem to work if they use the :1.2.840.113556.1.4.1941: modifier, aka > LDAP_MATCHING_RULE_IN_CHAIN. (Yes, it was a fairly big version jump.. > Yes, I should have

the problem is actually, i have two networks one is 192.168.1.* and 192.168.4.* , I have my linux pc in which samba server is running and it is in 192.168.1.12 and i have a AD server GNANA.COM in 192.168.1.14. i have shares which is having permission for only local linux users. i moved my linux pc from 192.168.1.12 to 192.168.4.12, samba server is running with the same config when it was running

Hi All, I'd like start using 'rid' idmap backed rather than 'tdb' on my member servers to keep gidNumbers in sync across the realm INCLUDING the DC. Problem is when I execute member1# getent group "MPD1\group1" I get no output. The gidNumbers fall within the range of 30000-60000. pestparm passes nicely. No erros logged whilst executing getent. Could anyone point me

in my optinion, yes, i use my own packages for years now, started with 4.1.x  ( still the same servers) started with debian wheezy and these are now debian stretch.   Start reading here, it wil help you ;-) https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/tree/master/howtos      Greetz,   Louis   Van: Taylor Hammerling [mailto:thammerling at tcsbasys.com] Verzonden: dinsdag 12 december 2017 15:13 Aan: L.P.H.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@us.ibm.com> diff -r 3ef0510e44d0 tools/python/xen/xend/XendAPI.py --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/XendAPI.py Tue May 08 10:21:23 2007 +0100 +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/XendAPI.py Mon May 14 23:17:32 2007 -0400 @@ -905,7 +941,7 @@ class XendAPI(object): XendNode.instance().set_name(new_name) return