similar to: Easy login/mapping from non domain member clients

Hi List, I successfully added a new schema to my DCs a couple of weeks ago (and didn't do anything with it yet.) Today I wanted to edit the schema some more but found the samba-tool ldapcmp command and ran it between my two DCs: | * Comparing [SCHEMA] context... | | * Objects to be compared: 1562 | | Comparing: | 'CN=bssGroup,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=bss,DC=example,DC=com'

Am 09.01.19 um 14:01 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > Try reading this: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 > > It's for DHCP updating dns records, but it uses a dedicated user and > kerberos, so it should help you. Thats exactly what I wanted, thanks. Just a little problem, "samba-tool [...] -k yes" after

On Fri, 2018-09-07 at 07:34 +0200, Jakob Lenfers via samba wrote: > Hi List, > > I successfully added a new schema to my DCs a couple of weeks ago (and > didn't do anything with it yet.) Today I wanted to edit the schema some > more but found the samba-tool ldapcmp command and ran it between my two DCs: > > > * Comparing [SCHEMA] context... > > > > *

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 10 januari 2019 14:09 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] samba-tool auth in scripts > > On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:42:46 +0100 > Jakob Lenfers <lenfers at bigsss-bremen.de> wrote: > > > Am

On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 11:42:46 +0100 Jakob Lenfers <lenfers at bigsss-bremen.de> wrote: > Am 09.01.19 um 14:01 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > Try reading this: > > > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 > > > > It's for DHCP updating dns records, but it uses a dedicated user and > >

Hi, I created a script to add DNS entries with samba-tool (for LetsEncrypt, as a dehydrated hook.) Works fine, but I have the password for the dedicated user to do that in the script in the clear. I think I read somewhere something about doing it with kerberos, but I never used kerberos and don't know where to start. Is there any good way to be doing this? Thanks, Jakob

Am 02.07.2018 um 11:01 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:19:29 +0200 > Jakob Lenfers via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > You can extend the schema, Samba even supplies a script to turn > openldap schemas to Active directory ldifs and it has the imaginative > name of 'oLschema2ldif' Thanks, will check it out. >> - Is it feasible

Hi, sorry if this is off topic, but it only happens when samba is involved, maybe anybody here has an idea. System info: - Clients used were Win10, ranging from 1803 to 1903. - The DCs are running Samba 4.7.6. - The print server is a member server. I tried both scenarios with two samba print servers, Ubuntu 18.04, Cups 2.7. One had Ubuntus Samba, 4.7.6. The other used Louis van Belles 4.10.7. -

Am 10.01.19 um 14:09 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > You don't ;-) > You do what the script should have done (I feel version 0.8.10 will > soon make an appearance), export the cache to use <export > KRB5CCNAME="/tmp/dhcp-dyndns.cc"> and then use '$KRB5CCNAME' wherever > '/tmp/dhcp-dyndns.cc' appears, except for: > [...] Yes, that worked.

Hi, I'm setting up a server with Dovecot (2.2.2) and Postfix (3.1.0). Dovecot authenticates against LDAP and Postfix uses Dovecots SASL. That already works fine. But I would like to have slightly different LDAP settings for Dovecot and Postfix. Current setup: passdb { driver = ldap args = /etc/dovecot/dovecot-ldap.conf.ext } userdb { driver = ldap args =

Am 02.07.2018 um 15:13 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > You really need to speak to Louis about email, but I think he would > suggest investigating Kopano. I like it and checked it out in the past, but I cannot rent software, I can only buy. And nightly builds in the CE aren't my cup of tea. >> Nextcloud works out of the box, but if I want to manage quotas there, >>

Hi, we moved (or still are moving) our users manually from our Samba NT4 Domain with LDAP to a Samba AD (4.7.6). We had a few schema extensions in our openLDAP to feed some services (dovecot mail settings, nextcloud quota, ...). I would prefer to have only one place for our users, but I'm new to AD. I've read that I can extend the schema, which seems not too different from openLDAP, even

Hi, I want to use rsync in my project that take increment image of files. This is for windowsXP and vista(stand alone) on localhost no need to use on network. I have following dll and exe:: - rsync.exe - cygwin1.dll - cygpopt-0-dll - rsync-param.reg Now in services.msc I am seeing "rsync" service. I have started that also and set in logon tab as "LocalComputer". Again I

On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 14:24:03 +0200 Jakob Lenfers <lenfers at bigsss-bremen.de> wrote: > Am 02.07.2018 um 11:01 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > >> - Is it feasible to authenticate and feed some user settings to > >> services like dovecot and nextcloud with a Samba AD? > > We have a wikipage for dovecot: > > > >

Hi Vincent, have you found a solution that makes "force directory mode = 2770" able to apply to new created folders ? I have a similar problem: if I set by hand (eg. chmod 2770) the folder A and then I try to create an X element into that folder through samba I get the result needed ( group of X become overriden from parent folder A ) but the problem is that the new element X not

On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 12:58 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > > > syslinux[64].exe -i -f c: bootsecfile.bss > > > > > > > > This should have been the form for your desire as specifying the > > > >

PE headers code_sz and image_sz indicate more or less, the size of the file and the size of the in-memory image. They are now given the right value. In the ELF format, only the program headers are reliable to determine the actually needed part of the file and the in-memory size. The .bss section should always be marked as NOLOAD for ld since its content shouldn't be included into the binary

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 12:31 PM David Henderson via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > Good afternoon all! I have a project I'm working on that requires > Linux to be installed either to its own partition, or to the partition > of a host OS (Windows or Linux). One way works, the other way does > not... For starters, what version? Official pre-compiled

On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > syslinux[64].exe -i -f c: bootsecfile.bss > > > > This should have been the form for your desire as specifying the > > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD instead of a removable drive like a

> On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 3:17 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > syslinux[64].exe -i -f c: bootsecfile.bss > > > > > > This should have been the form for your desire as specifying the > > > filename should have told it to create the BSS instead of writing it > > > to the VBR. Being the "fixed" HDD