similar to: Autoaccept all authentications to mitigate disabled guest logins in Windows 10 build 1709

On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 02:33 +0000, Daniel Migowski via samba wrote: > Hai, > > Already tried the bad user option. Samba still answers the client > that guest mode is to be used, but here is the problem. Windows 10 > forbids guest mode now because of Security concerns! I need a way for > Samba to accept the challenge response answer regardless of the user > so Windows believes

Hai, Already tried the bad user option. Samba still answers the client that guest mode is to be used, but here is the problem. Windows 10 forbids guest mode now because of Security concerns! I need a way for Samba to accept the challenge response answer regardless of the user so Windows believes it was authenticated. Any hack no matter how dirty is greatly appreciated. Greetings, Daniel Migowski

On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:28:03 +0000 Daniel Migowski <dmigowski at ikoffice.de> wrote: > "Security = User" ist already enabled. I assume you did mean that? > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von > Rowland Penny via samba Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. März 2018 11:22 > An: samba at lists.samba.org >

Hai, ... man smb.conf .... Have you tried that, that should work ;-) . There you should see something like this. [Global] map to guest = Bad Password [ashare] path = /home/public/share read only = yes guest ok = yes Look it up in the manual to see these settings explained, and dont forget to set the correct rights on the shared path. Greetz, Louis >

Ok, what is the windows event log telling you. You should see an error. What is the description and event id. Gr. Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Mueller [mailto:mueller at tropenklinik.de] > Verzonden: dinsdag 15 maart 2016 10:31 > Aan: 'L.P.H. van Belle'; samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: AW: [Samba] Windows 10 does not register dns in samba

So after digging deep and looking into my /var/log/messages for dns and recognizing that my providers internet dns not work correctly: Mar 16 07:49:48 s4slave named-sdb[15870]: error (connection refused) resolving 'ns2.allowsread.com/AAAA/IN': 192.52.178.30#53 Mar 16 07:49:50 s4slave named-sdb[15870]: error (network unreachable) resolving 'ns2.allowsread.com/AAAA/IN':

Are your running more domains on this samba server, this is the primary domain? tplk.loc ? The settings below looks good, you can try setting ipv4 preffered over ipv6 ( or disable ipv6) You can try also it with a fixed primary dns suffix. https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc786695(v=ws.10).aspx 1.Open the Network Connections folder and view available connections. 2.Right-click the

Hai Andrej, Oeps, Sorry, my mistake 4.6.x needs at least 1.1.29. But you can upgrade to 4.6.x ;-) Check again and if that problem then still exists, then i think you can better ask this one in the samba-technical list. Or if Rowland knows something more about this. One tip, wait untill tomorrow or the weekend, there wil be a new release due to the regression bug. There planning is to be

Hello to all, I am running samba 4.3.4 on centos 6 and I recognized that new windows 10 clients do not register dns . Windows 8.1 and below do with no issue. Do I have to configure something special in my smb.conf? Greetings Daniel EDV Daniel Müller Leitung EDV Tropenklinik Paul-Lechler-Krankenhaus Paul-Lechler-Str. 24 72076 Tübingen Tel.: 07071/206-463, Fax: 07071/206-499 eMail: mueller

An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: memory_profiler.txt URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20170330/f5d10ac9/memory_profiler.txt>

Hi, i read the xenpm wiki page, but i cannot use the "p-states". xenpm shows: xenpm cpu id : 0 total C-states : 2 idle time(ms) : 1776034 C0 : transition [00000000000000000000] residency [00000000000000000000 ms] C1 : transition [00000000000000260278] residency

> Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> hat am 30. März 2017 um 16:46 geschrieben: > If you look here: > > drwxrwx---+ 2 RUBENS\gf root 4096 Mär 30 14:09 gf > > There is a '+' sign after the permissions, this means that there are > ACLs set on the directory, try running 'getfacl /fs/gf' Ok, first /fs/mrtx, then /fs/gf: root at fs:~# getfacl /fs/mrtx

On Tue, 27 Mar 2018 22:41:15 +0200 Harry Jede via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 27. März 2018, 14:25:47 CEST schrieb Rodrigo Abrantes > Antunes via samba: > > I forgot to mention, I'm using samba 3. > OK. Quiet old thingy :-( > > you should read realy old docs: > https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/old/Samba3-HOWTO/ >

Hello Louis, I use your apt for samba. Great works btw!! :D root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V Version 4.7.3-Debian root at dc3:/etc/samba# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Debian Description: Debian GNU/Linux 9.2 (stretch) Release: 9.2 Codename: stretch Did you upgrade, if so, from .. To ... Samba version ? No upgrades. And why was running : samba-tool ntacl

Hi, I''m a big fan of Puppet and managed to have my company accept it. However, I''m having issues deploying it (I''m used to the debian version which works perfectly out of the box) : - There doesn''t seem to be an official repository for Suse (I''ve seen it mentionned in the bugtracker but yum.puppetlabs.com doesn''t contain SUSE packages). -

Am Sa., 2. März 2019 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Chris Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I’d be really opposed to flang reusing the Clang ASTs themselves. C++ is already a complicated language and mixing all of Fortran's concerns (including a completely different object model) will make both of them *worse* than having them stand alone IMO. Could there be a common base

Good Day All Sorry if this is a repeated email, but I need some information about how to disable SSL on a Samba4.2.2 AD domain controller as the nessus scanner is reporting the POODLE vulnerability and we are not allowed to have any of that in our environment. the nessus scan reports poodle vulnerability on all these ports: 443, 636, 3269 I had a look at previous posts but couldn't find a

Hi again, Am Montag, 14. März 2016, 00:44:47 CET schrieb Markus Dellermann: > Am Donnerstag, 10. März 2016, 10:41:34 CET schrieb mathias dufresne: > Hi, Mathias and all > thank you for your answer. > > > Hi all, > > > > SPN = servicePrincipalName > > > > A simple search returning all servicePrincipalName declared in your AD: > > ldbsearch -H $sam

Hi Mathias and all. Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2016, 13:26:12 CEST schrieb mathias dufresne: > Hi, > > I'm glad that helped you : ) > > About SPN, I found that link few days ago: > https://adsecurity.org/?page_id=183 > It tries to list the string values available usable for SPN. > > And it gives also that link: >

Forget about my part to nat file. I was wrong. Try my masq configuration. _____ Von: Michael Weickel - iQom Business Services GmbH [mailto:mw@iqom.de] Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. März 2010 00:17 An: ''Shorewall Users'' Betreff: AW: [Shorewall-users] NAT Issue Try 1.1.1.198 eth0 172.16.1.23 no no INTERFACE - interfacelist[:[digit]] Interfacees that