similar to: failed to call wbcSidToUid

I do not know if there is a uidNumber in Active Directory, I am not an administrator of Microsoft AD. So you claimed that I need add an extra parameters uidNumber and gidNumber to the MS Active Directory user, and add an extra value to each of them? I think that It will be impossible and too much extra work. I need similiar funcionality than it was in the previous version. So mabye I shoud change

On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 16:29:43 +0100 Marcin Kruk via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have samba-4.6.2-12.el7_4.x86_64 which is connected to WIndows > Active Directory Server. > > When I use command wbinfo -u > I can see a list of all users in AD domain > MYDOMAIN+user1 > MYDOMAIN+user2 At least this shows that winbind knows your AD users. > > When I

2018-03-05 17:28 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:15:44 +0100 > Marcin Kruk <askifyouneed at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I do not know if there is a uidNumber in Active Directory, I am not an > > administrator of Microsoft AD. > > So you claimed that I need add an extra parameters uidNumber and > >

I have a C++ program that I have been running on RedHat 6 and I want to move to CentOS 7. When I run it on the CentOS 7 system it fails with: error while loading shared libraries: libGLU.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I did this, but still have no libGLU. I did a find of the entire system for '*libGLU*' and nothing. bash-4.2# yum whatprovides libGLU.so.1

> You may get away with using the 'rid' backend, but this will have to be> your choice, but whatever you choose, I am sure we can help you get to> a working domain.> > RowlandSo I have an example. We have file and print server based on CentOS 7 with Samba 4.4.4. As wiki said (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Automatic_Printer_Driver_Downloads_for_Windows_Clients)

Yes, that's exactly what I've done.Ok, my group has name "IT admins", but logic is same;)Thank you. However I have one more problem. If I create new group or user and give it UID/GID, this is immediately reachable on linux server. id user, or getent group/passwd and also wbinfo -u/-g/-i can list info about it. But if I assign group to user (or deassign), it spends a lot of time

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:24:08 +0200 Jiří Černý via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thank you again, Rowland, for your time. > I think that different ID ranges in my domain is ok, at lest we will > survive it, Is it desired behavior, as I assume, that getent group > cannot list Domain Admins (and other groups) without setting UNIX GID. > GPO processing is now ok, at

Ah, so you did find a bug in the classic upgrade :-) great, one less in the future samba ;-) One extra to remember. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 september 2017 16:40 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba]

I do think its a classic upgrade from 3.x to 4.x that causes this. And the samba 3 was a samba with smbldap-tools or configured with something like : net groupmap add ntgroup="Domain Admins" unixgroup=domadm rid=512 type=d ( as shown here https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html ) > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

> I feel I can tell you this without breaking any confidences, the OP sent me their idmap.ldb and the problem boiled down to these three DNs>> CN=S-1-5-32-545> CN=S-1-5-32-544> CN=S-1-5-32-546> > The classicupgrade seems to set these to 'ID_TYPE_GID' instead of 'ID_TYPE_BOTH'.>> RowlandI can confirm this. After changing 'ID_TYPE_GID' to

> I feel this all has something to do with the classicupgrade, the command works for me, does 'wbinfo --sid-to-gid="S-1-5-32-544"' work ?Yes. Take a look:wbinfo --sid-to-gid="S-1-5-32-544" 15538wbinfo --gid-info=15538 BUILTIN\administrators:x:15538: > I haven't received it yet, but will examine and comment on it when I do.I sent it to <rpenny at

Rowland, Are (one) these not an option for him to correct this? --allocate-uid Get a new UID out of idmap --allocate-gid Get a new GID out of idmap --set-uid-mapping=UID,SID Create or modify uid to sid mapping in idmap --set-gid-mapping=GID,SID Create or modify gid

Valeri Galtsev wrote: <snip> >>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 17:25 , <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >>> >>>> CentOS 7 box. As there's no package in any of the repos, we're trying >>>> to install scikit-learn in the user's space. It refuses. My late try was, >>>> after d/l a .whl from last year, hoping that would work with the numpy

Hai, I leave the advice about the uid/gid numbering to Rowland, i can not give a good advice on that. The script was made in such a way that it should not matter what uid/gids are where used. The script looks them up for you, but it must be error free so we are sure what is set is correct. If you look in the script, you see the four SID. DC_SERVER_OPERATORS="S-1-5-32-549"

> m.roth at 5-cent.us kirjoitti 11.5.2018 kello 22.52: > > Jari Fredriksson wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> I just upgraded to the latest and tried to reboot: kernel panic and dead >> as a brick. >> >> Luckily GRUB still works and booting the to the next option in boot menu >> succeeds. >> >> How can this be? This OS is assumed to be

Hello everyone. I'm trying to fix sysvol rights, because i see errors in output of /usr/bin/samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory /var/lib/samba/sysvol/samdom.svmetal.cz/Policies/{6AC1786C-016F-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}

>When you provision a new domain, it is set 3000000, but, seemingly, when you run the classicupgrade it gets sets to a lower number (never actually run a classicupgrade) based on what is in your old domain. > Not sure what to suggest here, do you feel up to sending me (offlist) a copy of your idmap.ldb ? > >Rowland Thank you again, Rowland, for your time. I think that different ID

>On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 11:24:17 +0200>Jiří Černý via samba <samba at lists.samba.org ( https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba) > wrote:>>> I feel this all has something to do with the classicupgrade, the>> command works for me, does 'wbinfo --sid-to-gid="S-1-5-32-544"'>> work ?>> Yes. Take a look:wbinfo

> > >On 10/02/2017 06:24 PM, david wrote: > > Folks > > > > I performed an install of "java-devel".? Several packages got > > installed.? So far so good. > > > > Yet, when I performed > > ? yum list installed | grep java-devel > > and also > > ? yum rpm -qa | grep java-devel > > > > it did not show up as

Hi, folks, Well, still more fun (for values of fun approaching zero): 1. Went to install CUDA 9.0... well, gee, there is *no* CUDA 9.0. Even though I installed the 9 repo, all that I get is 8. I've used their webform, and an waiting on a reply. 2. I remove all nvidia packages. 3. It appears that the kmod-nvidia is what I need; that's what nvidia-detect