similar to: DNS update errors after a second DC is added to domain

I am also seeing this in smbd.log: [2020/07/03 09:20:18.211558, 1] ../../auth/kerberos/gssapi_helper.c:391(gssapi_check_packet) GSS VerifyMic failed: A token had an invalid MIC: unknown mech-code 2529638943 for mech 1 2 840 113554 1 2 2 [2020/07/03 09:20:18.211625, 0] ../../source4/auth/gensec/gensec_gssapi.c:1347(gensec_gssapi_check_packet)

I tried the version 4.2.11 and will not let me access the DNS via RSAT, I changed several permissions in several ways and does not allow me access will be a bug? if i try to browse dns from a windows2003 dns management utility in log.samba i got the following message: [2016/04/16 09:39:45.296046, 2] ../source4/rpc_server/dcerpc_server.c:1275(dcesrv_request) dcesrv_request: restrict

The server expects TLS but you didnt set tls. Read : https://www.samba.org/samba/history/samba-4.2.10.html basicly its now : Default: ldap server require strong auth = yes You can try to add: ldap server require strong auth = no But i do advice to setup the TLS parameters and make everything more secure. Please read these links, MS change some things in GPO also. MS16-072: Security

I tried the version 4.2.11 and will not let me access the DNS via RSAT, I changed several permissions in several ways and does not allow me access will be a bug? if i try to browse dns from a windows2003 dns management utility in log.samba i got the following message: [2016/04/16 09:39:45.296046, 2] ../source4/rpc_server/dcerpc_server.c:1275(dcesrv_request) dcesrv_request: restrict

Hello, I think I really need some help on this. Since Samba 4.2.11 upgrade my Windows 10 clients are unable to synchronize group policies. I have asked about this already here <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-April/199226.html>. Now I re-investigate the issue with Windows 10 1607 update and still face the same issue which prevents me from rolling out this configuration in

> Can you run on a failing computer : > - netdom verify yourpcname It seems to work only with FQDN: C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster The format of the specified computer name is invalid. The command failed to complete successfully. C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster.ad.cyberdyne.local The secure channel from CYB64W10-MONSTER.AD.CYBERDYNE.LOCAL to the domain CYBERDYNE

Hi Louis, Many many thanks for your very quick and comprehensive reply. I also found this thread here <https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2016-July/201471.html> Unfortunately none of the suggestions seem to entirely resolve the issue. As a first work-around I have inserted ldap server require strong auth = no to my smb.conf and re-started Samba. Unfortunately this didn't

>I actually also thought Windows does not care > about > case sensitivity and for hostnames by default it shouldn't matter. Thats correct but if windows is buggy.. Source : https://support.microsoft.com/nl-nl/kb/2891966 It was worth a try.. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2954031 for the status rapport error, one you can check also. I see still something incorrect

Hai, No, your output is not good. >C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster >The format of the specified computer name is invalid. Thats not good. > C:\Temp>nslookup cyb64w10-monster > Server: UnKnown > Address: fdea:5b48:d4c1:1:1::6 Also not good. If you resolving is setup correct both should work. netdom verify cyb64w10-monster and netdom verify

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 12:02:18 +0200 rme at bluemail.ch wrote: > > Well, I am using IPv6 mainly for all services and don't want to > > disable it. Though I might try this temporary which will be quite a > > bunch of reconfiguration to disable IPv6 in all services. So I will > > come back with results on this later. > > I have completely disabled IPv6 on the server

Forgot one extra. On the win 10, check this reg key. HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Hostname It states you hostname here, but if its not in caps change it to HOSTNAME In that register key. (HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters) You should see also you dnsdomain at Domain and NV Domain. NV Hostname should be in CAPS also. The domains not.

  Can you run on a failing computer : - netdom verify yourpcname - nslookup yourpcname All ok? And is time in sync?   Did you install winbind after the update and also and did you change you server services line?   Like, i use bind9 dns My smb.conf contains only this :        server services = -dns   The full line is :  samba-tool testparm -vv | grep "server service"

Hello Louis, Thanks for your reply. > No, your output is not good. So let's have a look. > >C:\Temp>netdom verify cyb64w10-monster > >The format of the specified computer name is invalid. > Thats not good. Well, it quite clearly states the format is invalid. If I use the the FQDN of the AD domain it works fine. The DNS search is also including the AD domain as

Hello, I am getting a GPG error with the ubuntu repository at the bristol UK mirror. When my source.list has this line: deb http://www.stats.bris.ac.uk/R/bin/linux/ubuntu/ intrepid/ On an "apt-get update" you get this: W: GPG error: http://www.stats.bris.ac.uk intrepid/ Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG D67FC6EAE2A11821 Vincent Goulet <vincent.goulet at

The WPR and LSB headers, used to generate the LS blob, may have a different layout and sizes depending on the driver version they come from. Abstract them and confine their use to driver-specific code. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> --- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.c | 102 +++++++++++++--------- drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/secboot/acr_r352.h | 119

Hi, I just started getting errors from APT: W: GPG error: http://apt.puppetlabs.com squeeze Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 1054B7A24BD6EC30 Puppet Labs Release Key (Puppet Labs Release Key) <info@puppetlabs.com> It looks like they keyring was changed yesterday on the APT repository: keyring.gpg 09-Jan-2013 14:51 2.5K However, I''ve yet to see an

On 1/2/2018 1:51 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:38:52 -0500 > lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > >> A few other observations while attempting to switch. >> >> * I do not have a dns.keytab file. Should I or is created after >> attempting to switch? > See my earlier post about samba_dnsupgrade. >

Dear all, after upgrading an existing NT4 domain, via "injecting" a samba3 LDAP BDC to vampire security database, classicupgrade with samba-tool ... everything seems to work like expecting, except the mentioned windows 2000 terminal server, see excerpt from log.samba file: ... [2012/11/18 13:09:26, 0] ../source4/smbd/server.c:475(binary_smbd_main) samba: using 'standard'

On 1/2/2018 2:23 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 14:15:11 -0500 > lingpanda101 <lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 1/2/2018 1:51 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: >>> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 13:38:52 -0500 >>> lingpanda101 via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> A few other observations while

Excuse me here if I am asking a question already asked, but im having some problems when entering "sudo apt-get update" in terminal. I get these errors; This is derived from problems with update manager so I thought id try the terminal to update. I have version 8.04.1 W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will