similar to: preparing to upgrade 4.6.7 to current

Louis, Glad to see you back. I asked this question about the time you left for family matter (hope family is fine, now.) Perhaps you could locate this dependency list that was in one of your install instruction text file, previously posted on one of your file sites? (If my memory serves me, it was a text file instruction for install of Samba 4.7 or 4.6, maybe?) On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 6:15

So, for now, should I work my way through the DNS manager and delete any references for the old dc manually or just leave it alone? On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:49 -0600, Robert Wooden via samba wrote: > > Will these DNS listings clear themselves with time or do I have a problem > > here? > >

Hai Bob, Thanks, yeah the family is getting better, 2 funerals in 1 month is hard. But we get through that, its in the end, this happens to everybody... I think you did mean https://github.com/thctlo/samba4 Most can be found there. The howto's are based on debian stretch samba 4.5, these work fine also for 4.7 and 4.8. But you need to update the smb.conf a bit for that. Greetz,

I Google searched this morning and had found this: " https://superuser.com/questions/1281015/changing-computer-name-on-dns-samba4-ad-server" which discusses a similarity to your suggestion. I was concerned because I cannot tell if the OP is referencing 'internal dns' or 'bind9'. However, what the OP is talking about doing, makes sense. (Could be later today before I

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 19:02 -0600, Robert Wooden via samba wrote: > So, for now, should I work my way through the DNS manager and delete any > references for the old dc manually or just leave it alone? Yes, clean it up by hand. Except the SOA, which you can change to something else if you like. > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:16 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: >

I am preparing to upgrade from 4.6.7 (from source) to current 4.7.5. I have completed other version upgrades in the past and have not experienced this event. I have two (2) DC running as domain controllers properly replicating each to each other. On the (non-FSMO) DC I ran this to check the db and got: root at dc07:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs Checking 3546 objects NOTE: old (due to rename

Was busy, jumped back on here and answers Rowland's post (I think he might be into something there) and overlooked your post. No, I haven't but, I will, soon. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [3] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-02-25 16:18, Miguel Medalha wrote: >> I've got a samba4

The "DNS_TYPE_NS" records show the correct DC's (both, I have two). The "DNS_TYPE_A" records show the correct DC's ip addresses. The "DNS_TYPE_SOA" shows the demoed DC FQDN in the "mname" > It should produce the SOA record (after you make the obvious changes), > what 'dnsRecord' objects does it show ? There should a

In the Windows world side when an "administrator" cannot 'take ownership' of a file share, the docs discuss the "System" account being used as it (System account) has greater permissions than that of the administrator. I remembered reading this page https://wiki.samba.org/index. php/The_SYSTEM_Account and have now re-read said page *carefully*. There I find this

Okay!!! My member server ip address is 192.168.**.56 (static). When I run your command it is reporting the ip address of 192.168.**.55 (which is my DC02 address.) So, I need to correct this. How do I remove the 'old member server' ip address 192.168.**.55 reference and correct to 192.168.**.56? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main)

Part of the smb.conf [home] path = /home/samba/DTDC01/users comment = user folder 4 redirection read only = no Hum-m-m? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-01-08 12:56, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 08/01/15 18:37, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > First, I keep

You are correct. I discovered (a few minutes ago) that /etc/apt/sources.list.d/debian-wheezy-sernet.list had the duplicate line within it. Funny thing was, when I "comment out" the duplicate line, that "commented out" the single entry within the file. All other lines were already 'commented out'. So, after 'apt-get update' ran without error, I went back and

On 13/02/15 19:48, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Thank you, Rowland. > > Copied your simpler ntp.conf file into my member server. Made the > appropriate changes. Restarted all the ntp service on all machines (just > in case.) Ran 'ntpq -p' (on member server) and got the correct answer. > Proper connection to DC's. > --- > >

and you didnt find my scripts ;-) https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/ The wheezy scripts should work also on ubuntu. It all in there what you want to know. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bob at donelsontrophy.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Donelson Trophy >Verzonden: zondag 7 december 2014 16:41 >Aan: SAMBA MailList

Hai Bob. SETDNSDOMAIN='hostname -d' needs to be: SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` .. so change them all . SETDNSDOMAIN=`hostname -d` SETHOSTNAME=`hostname -s` SERVER_IP_ADDRESS=`hostname -i` and you can ignore : >[....] Stopping domain name service...: bind9rndc: connect failed: >127.0.0.1#953: connection refused > >. ok > >[ ok ] Starting domain name service...:

First, I will try forwarding the original sent this morning. If it still appear poorly formated I'll try something different. PLEASE WAIT FOR A CLEAN COPY IF THIS ONE IS STILL BAD. --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main) www.donelsontrophy.com [1] "Everyone deserves an award!!" -------- Original Message -------- SUBJECT: Re:

On 27/02/15 20:08, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > No. > > What I did was change the first few to see what happens. And still the > first 13 (this time, last time 17) failed. I am baffled why the first 11 > to 17 fail (randomly) and the remainder receive "Successfully granted > rights." > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden

That was a cut/paste error. I've been thinking (danger, danger) when I test kerberos it returns the two DC's are available. Should it be including the member server also? Didn't I see the script setup kerberos on the member server? (Remember this was installed with the gen one scripts, not the newest scripts.) --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy

On 08/01/15 19:10, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > Part of the smb.conf > > [home] > path = /home/samba/DTDC01/users > comment = user folder 4 redirection > read only = no > > Hum-m-m? > > --- > > ------------------------- > > Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy > > 615.885.2846 (main) > www.donelsontrophy.com [1] > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The command line order shouldn't matter though that might depend on what else is in there (especially -s). Rsync is backwards compatible so the version mismatch shouldn't matter but 3.1 has some nice benefits over 3.0.9 so upgrading is a good idea. In the end you probably need to know what rsync command line is being run and what rsync says