similar to: Windows 10 spawning thousands of child processes on Samba 4.3.11 server

I know more people posted about this , but i see no solution. smbstatus gives over 100 nobody users The windows 10 pc is doing nothing, just a reboot ( and logon ) , than this happens: Samba version 4.6.2 Centos 7. PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing

I receive the following meteo dataset regularly, containing the average daily temperatures (tMedia) of a certain month for 24 selected meteo-stations (COD_WMO) whose human-readable names are in (NOME). str(tabella) `data.frame': 1038 obs. of 4 variables: $ COD_WMO: int 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 16045 ... $ NOME : Factor w/ 24 levels

I am thankful for all support received so far and I feel I'm getting closer to a solution. To get back to basics and a more transparent setup I have made a clean Ubuntu 16.04 installation and followed this guide https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Standalone_Server Windows clients users are logged in with username Admin (local account, administrator). The samba share is

I have 10 Windows 10 clients connecting to Ubuntu 16.04 with Samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu. Each client has one smbd process, but I notice the number of child processes is exploding into 40.000+ the next day after a restart. I reckon this is not normal. Server load is < 0.1 but client applications are misbehaving and crashing. The problems started when moving from an old Ubuntu 10.04 to a newer

On Tue, 23 May 2017 16:34:29 +0200 Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Yes, the users exist as both Linux and Samba users. My question was > if the Windows client user "Admin" also needs to be Linux and Samba > user. > There is no windows user called 'Admin', there is one called 'Administrator', if it is the later, then it

Did you TV/Radio broke?? ;-) This really smells like some malware/cryptoware. Seen this ones on a network, and that was a cypto trying to write to shares. And they to that really really fast. Increast the samba debug logs and track if this is client related. That where i would start. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2017 14:13:33 +0200 > Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > I wonder why this guest unmapped user appears? > > > > Probably because you have 'map to guest = bad user', this is from 'man > smb.conf': > >

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2017 14:53:57 +0200 > Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > 1. The Windows client user "Admin" has mounted samba share with > > > username > > "production" and can access any files on that share. Why does Samba

On Tue, 23 May 2017 14:13:33 +0200 Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > I wonder why this guest unmapped user appears? > Probably because you have 'map to guest = bad user', this is from 'man smb.conf': Bad User - Means user logins with an invalid password are rejected, unless the username does not exist, in which case it is treated as

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:59 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 23 May 2017 08:44:42 +0200 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Did you TV/Radio broke?? ;-) > > > > This really smells like some malware/cryptoware. > > Seen this ones on a network, and that was a cypto

On Tue, 23 May 2017 14:53:57 +0200 Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > 1. The Windows client user "Admin" has mounted samba share with > > username > "production" and can access any files on that share. Why does Samba > start messing with other/unknown usernames? Should I create a > Linux/Samba "Admin" user? I

On Tue, 23 May 2017 08:44:42 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Did you TV/Radio broke?? ;-) > > This really smells like some malware/cryptoware. > Seen this ones on a network, and that was a cypto trying to write to > shares. And they to that really really fast. > > Increast the samba debug logs and track if this is

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:32 PM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 22 May 2017 23:22:32 +0200 > Asbjorn Taugbol via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I have 10 Windows 10 clients connecting to Ubuntu 16.04 with Samba > > version 4.3.11-Ubuntu. Each client has one smbd process, but I notice > > the number of child processes is

Hi Folks, Small office setup, 3 computers, 3 staff. Recently updated system and rebooted. Today, I am seeing crazy amounts of the same listing for clients (294 lines!) and open files... (snipped content below, you really don't want PAGES of it!) $ smbstatus Samba version 4.3.11-Ubuntu PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version

Does anyone have experience with using HTB to shape traffic for several thousands of users, each with a class of their own? The LARTC HOWTO has a section about setting up hashed filters to deal with "many" classes. Has anyone used that setup? -- ams

Hi, to send an email with ar_mailer I need to generate it and save it to the db, right? Currently the code looks very simple: Newsletter.recepients.each do |recepient| NewsletterMailer.deliver_dedicated(request, recepient, newsletter) end But for i.e. 30000 receivers it''s going to take a long while anyway. Should I create them somehow in the background using BackgrounDRb or something

Hello I have a large cluster in which every node is logging: I [socket.c:2474:socket_event_handler] 0-transport: EPOLLERR - disconnecting now At a rate of of around 4 or 5 per second per node, which is adding up to a lot of messages. This seems to happen while my cluster is idle. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Gino Lisignoli <glisignoli at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello > > I have a large cluster in which every node is logging: > > I [socket.c:2474:socket_event_handler] 0-transport: EPOLLERR - > disconnecting now > > At a rate of of around 4 or 5 per second per node, which is adding up to a > lot of messages. This seems to happen while my

-----Messaggio originale----- Da: Kevin Walsh [mailto:kevin@cursor.biz] > I don't quite understand your Caller*ID dilemma. > In your sip.conf, you'd have a block for each user, say [abc123]. > That's your random username, yes? The same block would also > define the password and other directives. Why can't you simply > include the "callerid" directive

Since the largest regional ILEC in Brazil completely stopped taking new BRI ISDN customers and started heavily incentiving their existing customers to migrate over to ADSL (regardless if what they need is voice or data), we have thousands of ISDN phones collecting dust. Is there any network side U cards that will work with Asterisk, so we can turn those phones into useful things ? I'm