similar to: Not your typical domain migration

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Not your typical domain migration"

2018 Feb 12
0
Not your typical domain migration
Hi Scott, Am 12.02.2018 um 06:46 schrieb Scott Whitten via samba: > I can do Windows 2003->2012->2016 without too much trouble. Can't you join 2016 to the 2003 domain, demote 2003, and raise the functional levels? Or join a Samba AD DC and continue without MS. ;-) > I'm concerned about the Samba side. The servers are all using extended > file system permissions and
2019 Feb 24
2
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 19:25:14 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > Am 24.02.2019 um 18:48 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:28:43 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> > > wrote: > >> Am 24.02.2019 um 16:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba > >> <samba at
2020 Sep 03
4
SID mapping: Samba and SSSD
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: > > On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 03/09/2020 21:15, Robert Marcano via samba wrote: > >>> > >>> There is an sssd provided idmapper (on RHEL/CentOS/Fedora) it is > >>> packaged
2019 Nov 05
2
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 01:37:15 PST Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 04/11/2019 18:52, Alexey A Nikitin wrote: > > On Sunday, 3 November 2019 01:41:18 PST Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> As I said, you cannot use 'winbind use default domain = yes' with > >> 'autorid', it makes all users and groups members of the same domain, > >> this
2019 Feb 24
3
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:28:43 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> wrote: > > Am 24.02.2019 um 16:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > > On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:58:39 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> > > wrote: > >> Another thing that a customer has just been bitten by, was a subtle > >> bug in
2024 Jun 14
1
Choosing a backend idamp and example scenarios for each one
Hi, On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 4:44?PM Elias Pereira via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > hi, > > Knowing the 3 idmap backends (ad, rid and autorid) available to configure > samba as a domain member, could you give examples of scenarios in which > each backend would be more suitable? > > I also wrote some documentation for the ubuntu server guide about this,
2024 Jun 15
1
Choosing a backend idamp and example scenarios for each one
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:32:30 -0300 Andreas Hasenack via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 4:44?PM Elias Pereira via samba < > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > hi, > > > > Knowing the 3 idmap backends (ad, rid and autorid) available to > > configure samba as a domain member, could you give examples
2019 Feb 24
2
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
On 24.02.2019 19:25, Ralph Böhme via samba wrote: > Am 24.02.2019 um 18:48 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 18:28:43 +0100 Ralph Böhme <slow at samba.org> wrote: >>> Am 24.02.2019 um 16:42 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >>>> On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 15:58:39 +0100 Ralph Böhme
2024 Jun 20
2
Choosing a backend idamp and example scenarios for each one
Thank you all!!!! Great content!!! Speaking of scenarios... What would be the best backend for? Scenario 1: 3 DCs and 1 fileserver 2800 users Scenario 2: 4 DCs and 2 fileserver 2800+ users On Sat, Jun 15, 2024 at 4:49?AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 17:32:30 -0300 > Andreas Hasenack via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
2016 Jan 11
2
Security permissions issues after changing idmap backend from RID to AUTORID
On 2016-01-10 at 17:58 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > On 10/01/16 17:05, Partha Sarathi wrote: > > > > > This could have a lot to do with the fact that idmap_rid & > > > idmap_autorid calculate the uids differently i.e if you have RID > > > '2025000', autorid would calculate this as '1102500000' , rid > > > would calculate this as
2016 Jan 10
2
Security permissions issues after changing idmap backend from RID to AUTORID
Thanks for the reply. Now we end-up with mix uid/gid from both ranges in cache TDBs. Few user logins are denied with below error in smbd.log, *[2016/01/07 11:39:44.475960, 1, pid=5202] ../source3/auth/token_util.c:430(add_local_groups* ** SID S-1-5-21-3082371790-1274690562-2878062458-5771 -> getpwuid(10005771) failed** wbinfo --user-info=mariond mariond:*:10015138:110000513:Marion,
2019 Feb 26
2
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:49:42 +0100 Ralph Böhme via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 12:45:45PM +0100, Björn JACKE via samba wrote: > >On 2019-02-25 at 11:32 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba sent off: > >> > (I take it xid stands for both uid and gid?) > >> > >> No, I think it was chosen to differentiate them from uidNumber
2016 Jan 08
2
Security permissions issues after changing idmap backend from RID to AUTORID
adding samba list On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Partha Sarathi <parthasarathi.bl at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > We have a customer who facing security issues after changing RID idmap > backend to AUTORID. > > > The History of the issue looks as below, > > 1) When samba configured with RID idmap backend customer requested to > change few permissions,
2019 Feb 23
2
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
> Am 23.02.2019 um 22:23 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >>>>> He also has these: >>>>> >>>>> idmap config * : rangesize = 1000000 >>>>> idmap config * : range = 1000000-19999999 >>>>> idmap config * : backend = autorid >>>>> >>>>> The '*' domain
2019 Nov 03
2
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 08:39 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/11/2019 23:18, Hilberg via samba wrote: > > Hi > > > > The server suddenly changed the uid + gid. this happened to times, > > yesterday and the week after. The default group at example > > The samba is a AD member where we have many users (>20 000) and we > > use > > autorid
2019 Feb 26
2
winbind causing huge timeouts/delays since 4.8
On 2019-02-25 at 11:32 +0000 Rowland Penny via samba sent off: > > (I take it xid stands for both uid and gid?) > > No, I think it was chosen to differentiate them from uidNumber & > gidNumber attributes, they are similar but not the same. They also only > exist on DC's in Windows the owner of a file can be a group. In the unix world the main owner is always a user.
2020 Jun 24
3
Recipe/advice for Samba 4.11 on Ubuntu 20.04 as member server joining Windows Server 2019 AD
Hi, Brand new VM's running on ESXi replacing existing Samba 3 NT domain. I am not quite brand new but this is my first time for this combination. Would like to use Win Ad for authentication and Samba for 20 users and company shared data. Started with this how-to: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member Lost my way on Choose backend for id mapping in winbindd
2018 Sep 01
2
winbindd crashing -- how to auto-heal?
I'm not a sysadmin (so I don't have domain admin skills), I'm just coming at this as a user of these (flaky) hosts, but I'll try to answer the questions. If autorid is an odd/problematic setting, I can pass that info on to the sysadmins. I looked at https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-May/191544.html (since I don't really know the difference between these settings), but
2020 Sep 03
8
SID mapping: Samba and SSSD
On 03/09/2020 22:08, Jeremy Allison wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:05:46PM -0400, Andrew Walker via samba wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:45 PM Rowland penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On 03/09/2020 21:38, Robert Marcano wrote: >>>> On 9/3/20 4:35 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On
2019 Nov 03
2
suddenly change: idmap uid + gid
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 20:57 +0000, Rowland penny wrote: > > > G'Day Rowland, > > > > Are you really sure that is the case? > > > > The "winbind use default domain" code, which I authored, certainly > > isn't intended to do that. It changes the formatting at the nss > > interface to strip the domain\ prefix, allowing local logins