similar to: Mac client the color label associated to a file is lost after editing...

On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 11:56:51 +0100 Dario Palmisano via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > thanks in advance for the support! > > My samba server is samba-3.6.23-45.el6_9.x86_64, on Scientific Linux > 6. > > Using a Mac it is possible to associate a color label to a file > (suppose a word document). This can be done on the samba share too, >

Hello! [Cc to stable@, for wider audience] The plan is two axe two old networking protocols from FreeBSD head/, meaning that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would be shipped without them. 1) AppleTalk Last time claimed to be supported by vendor in 2007[1]. In practice had very little use since 90th. Discontinued by major routing equipment vendors since 2009[2].

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [please cc to my address] Dear Samba and Netatalk experts, I've got a server running both samba 2.2.3a as PDC and netatalk (1.5pre7 as supplied by SuSE73). Samba machine accounts are added to /etc/passwd automatically by the command add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 90 -s /bin/false -M %u when a NT machine is added to the

Is it possible to backup Mac OS devices through a Samba share on Samba 4.4.6 on Fedora 24 with Time Machine? I am able to successfully advertise the share through Avahi, connect to it in Finder, and read/write files. I am also able to see the share as a destination in Time Machine, but selecting it shows an error that "The selected network backup disk does not support the required

Hi all, Looking for a "best practices" way to share out to both Mac and PC easily. I know Windoze enables the same sharepoint for both the mac and pc shares and there don't seem to be any real "problems" by doing that. However I work in an environment which forces us to utilize Win9x through XP as well as OS 9 through 10.x on the mac side. I need a user friendly way to

hi@all i'm using netatalk and samba as fileserver for different clients (OS9,X,WinNT/2K/XP) to create shares, that are visible and accessible for all clients (via afp/smb) i created a folder and made it public in all daemons (atalk, samba) to get a better file handling i'm using the samba feature: vfs object = netatalk but there are still some problems files that are created via afp

(This is a brief announcement of a focused development/refinement of the Netatalk project.) The primary goal of Baltra is to provide a Mac OS X compatible AFP file sharing service with Samba 3.0 compatibility. We are hoping to have an AFP file sharing daemon which can run in parallel with Samba 3.0 to provide seemless file sharing amoungst SMB-based clients (Windows and MacOS-X) as well as

Hi. Guys I have a big issue, working with my domain member running samba Version 3.6.23-42.el6_9. As member of my domain running samba -- LIving the dream...

Hello all, I’m trying to use samba 4.5.8 as a file server for my Macs (all 10.12.4 now), as a replacement for netatalk. I did setup smb.conf as suggested # # Options for macOS # http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS <http://netatalk.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Netatalk_3.1.11_SRPM_for_Fedora_and_CentOS> # ea support = yes vfs

What info could help? Centos 6 is still not EOL yet (2020 right?). On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 29 May 2017 14:12:34 -0700 > Alberto Moreno via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > Guys I have a big issue, working with my domain member running > > samba

On Sun, 11 Feb 2018, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2018-02-06, me at tdiehl.org > <me at tdiehl.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a c-6 machine that I noticed the following on: >> >> (bugs pts10) # package-cleanup --problems Loaded plugins: >> fastestmirror, priorities, refresh-packagekit Package >> system-config-printer-libs-1.1.16-26.el6.x86_64

Client: Dual 1GHz G4 OSX 10.2 Gig-Ethernet Server: Dual 2GHz P4 Linux 2.4.18 Raid-5 1TB Gig-Ethernet With netatalk 1.5.5 I get sustained writes of 66MB/s (yes, megabytes) With samba 2.2.7a I get sustained writes of 15MB/s I've tweaked the settings and ended up with these: socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_KEEPALIVE read raw =

I guess I'm sort of surprised and I expected better performance I have a new server set up with RAID 10 drives (6) Repeated a number of times and though I am clumsy with stop watch timing, these numbers appear to be close enough for government work... Server, CentOS 5.2 and updated earlier today, just installed a week ago. Client, Macintosh G4, OS X 10.4.11 NFS Mount is done with the

TL;DR: Time Machine cannot create a *new* backup on my shared drive, but can add to an *existing* backup. I'm running macOS Catalina and my Time Machine backs up to a Debian 10 server with NetAtalk and Avahi. Since Mavericks macOS has preferred SMB, and given SMB is marginally faster I decided to switch to using SMB for the Time Machine shares. On a fresh AFP share I can start a new Time

Hi, I have a c-6 machine that I noticed the following on: (bugs pts10) # package-cleanup --problems Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, refresh-packagekit Package system-config-printer-libs-1.1.16-26.el6.x86_64 requires libsmbclient.so.0()(64bit) Package kdebase-runtime-libs-4.3.4-9.el6.x86_64 requires libsmbclient.so.0()(64bit) So then I ran: (bugs pts10) # yum install libsmbclient

since "ea = samba" was only added to very recent netatalk versions and so don't apply to files with a history of many years what is the way to go get rid of netatalk these days? is there still no tool to read/write the existing netatalk appladouble extended attributes which are *not* compatible with samba and write them back in the new format? afp.conf: appledouble = ea ea = samba

hi all, I've read trough the list and see discussions with similar problems. I've setup a file server and users can connect to it via SMB/CIFS. Windows users just happy. The problem starts with the Mac users. All Mac users are using OS X (versions 10.2,10.3). I'm vetoing several files right now, permission inheriting turned on, I've forced the create mode and directory mode to

I have a need to use the unsupported kernel for one feature only (AFP/Appletalk support). Never having had to use it before, I''m unsure of what''s all in it other than reading it''s config file. From those that do use it -- is it considered stable enough to use in lightweight production? I''m debating the use of it versus wasting my time rebuilding the normal

Hi Ralph, Thanks for the reply and thank you for your work on vfs_fruit. On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Ralph Boehme <rb at sernet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 10:40:32PM -0500, Ryan Bair wrote: > > I have a share with approximately 5000 folders in the base directory. The > > performance on an OS X client is somewhat less than exciting. I compiled

Hello Jeremy, Could you send me some references to the ‘cross-protocol issue’ (Bugzilla, documentation, etc)? I’ll disable the ‘kernel oplocks’ and see what happens. We’re getting all sorts of weirdness from our Mac SMB clients since we upgraded to Samba v4.4.3. In particular, when we open a session with an OSX (Yosemite) client with SMB autommount directories, we see multiple SMBD processes