Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "[Patches] AD Database corruption after upgrade from <= 4.6 to 4.7 (bug #13228)"
2018 Jan 31
2
[Patches] for dbcheck (Re: [Patches] AD Database corruption after upgrade from <= 4.6 to 4.7 (bug #13228))
Hi Stefan
I am also one of the Sernet customer. Can you guide me how to run the patch
to fix the bug.
I am running 2 DC's Sernet Samba 4.7.4 with 2 RODC's running Sernet Samba
4.7.4. Whenever I run samba-tool drs replicate --fix --yes command on the
DC it shows the below errors which cannot be fixed:
Failed to remove deleted DN attribute fromServer : (65, "objectclass_attrs:
at
2018 Jan 31
0
[Patches] for dbcheck (Re: [Patches] AD Database corruption after upgrade from <= 4.6 to 4.7 (bug #13228))
Hi Harsh,
sorry, but you're problem is not related to my patches.
This may need further investigation.
metze
Am 31.01.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Harsh Kukreja:
> Hi Stefan
>
> I am also one of the Sernet customer. Can you guide me how to run the patch
> to fix the bug.
>
> I am running 2 DC's Sernet Samba 4.7.4 with 2 RODC's running Sernet Samba
> 4.7.4. Whenever
2018 Jan 26
0
samba-tool dbcheck failing
Hi
I am running samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix --yes command on my DC
running 4.7.4 to remove the Deleted and Stale records which is failing
Target GUID points at deleted DN
'<GUID=3484ea7a-da88-4269-9b32-55a9c7faabf6>;CN=NTDS
2018 Jan 09
2
Replication Error
Hi Denis
Thanks for your response without your crystal ball.
I have increased the log level =9 dns:0 on both the servers. It replicates
successfully by manually running the command
samba-tool drs replicate SERVER2 SERVER1 dc=iumnet,dc=edu,dc=na --full-sync
but it is still failing when I check from the samba-tool drs showrepl
Also I run samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix on both the servers
2019 Jan 22
2
dbtool --cross-ncs and undeletable errors..
On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:20:21 -0500 (EST)
> "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02
>> and 03 are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable
>> to
2019 Jan 22
2
dbtool --cross-ncs and undeletable errors..
Hi All,
On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02 and 03
are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable to fix.. Any hints?
* Basic dbcheck is clean.
[root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool dbcheck
Checking 327 objects
Checked 327 objects (0 errors)
* Cross-NCS shows two errors related to a de-comissionned DC (dc02) and
cannot auto-fix this.. How do I fix
2018 Jan 11
4
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
Hi
I have tried using FQDN for DC1 and DC2 but still it is failing.Please
assist to fix
samba-tool drs replicate iumdcdp01.iumnet.edu.na iumsvrpdc
DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na --sync-forced -UAdministrator
INFO: Current debug levels:
all: 9
tdb: 9
printdrivers: 9
lanman: 9
smb: 9
rpc_parse: 9
rpc_srv: 9
rpc_cli: 9
passdb: 9
sam: 9
auth: 9
winbind: 9
vfs: 9
idmap: 9
2018 Jan 16
3
User Permissions issue
Hi Denis
Thanks for your advise I will not use these wordings here.
Please check the result below when I run the command on the DC-1 when DC-2
is off or on
smbclient -k //IUMSVRAPP01/Pastel12 -d 9
INFO: Current debug levels:
all: 9
tdb: 9
printdrivers: 9
lanman: 9
smb: 9
rpc_parse: 9
rpc_srv: 9
rpc_cli: 9
passdb: 9
sam: 9
auth: 9
winbind: 9
vfs: 9
idmap: 9
quota: 9
2018 Jan 17
3
User Permissions issue
Hi Denis & Rowland
Thanks for the suggestion to trim the smb.conf after which the DC-1 is
connecting to the Windows Server 2008 shared folder smbclient -k
//IUMSVRAPP01/Pastel12 -d 9
and DC-2 is also connecting after using the DNS name of the Windows server.
*You'd better switch your DNS to Bind-DLZ. Internal DNS is not that good
for larger site (looking at your DNS domain name, I guess
2018 Jan 16
2
User Permissions issue
Hi
I have two Samba 4 DC’s as below
server-1 with all FSMO roles running Samba 4.6.12 on Ubuntu 12.04
server-2 joined to server-1 as a DC running Samba 4.7.4 Ubuntu 16.04
The problem is when I share files from my Windows 2008 file sharing server
which shows it is logged on to Server-2 DC and the client PC which logs on
to the server-1 DC cannot access the shared folder and gives an error Logon
2018 Jan 12
1
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
Hi James
Thanks for your response.
hots -t A iumsvrpdc (use it's fqdn as well) I have verified it with the
FQDN which says that the record iumsvrpdc.iumnet.edu.na exists
Search for 'iumsvrpdc' objectGUID
ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb '(invocationId=*)'
--cross-ncs objectguid : it shows 2 records found
# record 1
dn: CN=NTDS
2017 Oct 27
5
ADC 4.7.0 KCC replication failing with PDC 4.6.8
Hi
I have created a new DC on the Ubuntu 16.04 with the latest sernet samba
4.7.0 package. After joining to the PDC running 4.6.8 package I backed up
the idmap.ldb file and copied to the new DC. When I run the samba-tool
ntacl sysvolreset command on the new DC to replicate GID Mappings it fails
with the below error:
open: error=2 (No such file or directory) ERROR(runtime): uncaught
exception -
2018 Jan 19
1
User Permissions issue
Hi Denis
I have upgraded my samba DC-1 from 4.6.12 to 4.7.4 which has solved the
replication issues between DC-1 and DC-2. Now both the DC's are running on
4.7.4.
Like Rowland said previously, you should remove all RODC that have been
installed prior to Samba 4.7. There are many fixes that have been added
since 4.6.
Before I remove my RODC's I like to clear out few doubts:
1. Instead of
2018 Jan 11
3
DRS Replication between two DC's Failing
Hi
The DRS sync between two Domain Controllers connected on one network is
failing. I have enabled the log level 9.
samba-tool drs replicate 172.16.10.5 iumsvrpdc DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na
--full-sync -UAdministrator
INFO: Current debug levels:
all: 9
tdb: 9
printdrivers: 9
lanman: 9
smb: 9
rpc_parse: 9
rpc_srv: 9
rpc_cli: 9
passdb: 9
sam: 9
auth: 9
winbind: 9
vfs: 9
2017 Nov 17
2
SAMBA failing to start after upgrade
The upgrade shouldn't have touched the Samba database, just the
binaries etc, so check the smb.conf file and recreate it if you cannot
find it, or if it is incorrect.
The smb.conf still exists
[global]
workgroup = IUMNET
realm = IUMNET.EDU.NA
netbios name = IUMDCDP01
server role = active directory domain controller
dns forwarder = 172.16.10.254
2018 Jan 11
4
Cannot remove offline domain
Hi
I am trying to remove a dead offline domain using the below command which
is failing
samba-tool domain demote --remove-other-dead-server=IUMONG-RODC
-UAdministrator
ERROR: Demote failed: DemoteException: IUMONG-RODC is not an AD DC in
iumnet.edu.na
A transaction is still active in ldb context [0x2bf15b0] on
tdb:///var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb
IUMONG-RODC domain is still visible under domain
2018 Jan 09
2
Replication Error
Hi
I am running Server-1 Samba4 AD 4.6.10 with an additional Server-2 Samba4
AD 4.7.2 The Inbound replication on the Server-1 is failing with the error
below:
DC=iumnet,DC=edu,DC=na
Default-First-Site-Name\Server-2 via RPC
DSA object GUID: 27182378-a9c7-451e-bb95-7b2172a5f311
Last attempt @ Tue Jan 9 12:55:59 2018 WAST failed, result
58
2017 Oct 28
1
ADC 4.7.0 KCC replication failing with PDC 4.6.8
Hi Rowland
Thanks for the link https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Port_Usage
It should fix the Firewall authentication problem.
I like to find out if I can rename the Domain name of the DC when I move it
to the new DC like currently it is IUMNET.EDU.NA <http://iumnet.edu.na/> but
my GApps domain name is IUM.EDU.NA <http://ium.edu.na/> and I like to use
the same on my new
2017 Nov 17
1
SAMBA failing to start after upgrade
Hi Rowland
The samba-tool command is not working please see the error below:
root at iumdcdp01:/home/administrator# samba-tool
ERROR(<type 'exceptions.ValueError'>): uncaught exception - bad marshal
data (unknown type code)
File "/usr/bin/samba-tool", line 46, in <module>
retval = cmd._run("samba-tool", subcommand, *args)
File
2016 Dec 19
3
GPO Security Filtering "Access Denied"
On 19/12/16 17:57, Miguel medalha wrote:
>>> No, I don't, because this is a loopback and I only want certain
>>> users on these computers to have the screensaver and lock disabled. If I did that it would apply to everyone.
> No, it wouldn't apply to everyone. As of April this year, according to Microsoft, all policies must have "Authenticated Users" with