similar to: samba-tool dbcheck failing

Hi Harsh, sorry, but you're problem is not related to my patches. This may need further investigation. metze Am 31.01.2018 um 12:45 schrieb Harsh Kukreja: > Hi Stefan > > I am also one of the Sernet customer. Can you guide me how to run the patch > to fix the bug. > > I am running 2 DC's Sernet Samba 4.7.4 with 2 RODC's running Sernet Samba > 4.7.4. Whenever

Hi Stefan I am also one of the Sernet customer. Can you guide me how to run the patch to fix the bug. I am running 2 DC's Sernet Samba 4.7.4 with 2 RODC's running Sernet Samba 4.7.4. Whenever I run samba-tool drs replicate --fix --yes command on the DC it shows the below errors which cannot be fixed: Failed to remove deleted DN attribute fromServer : (65, "objectclass_attrs: at

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:20:21 -0500 (EST) "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02 > and 03 are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable > to fix.. Any hints? > > * Basic dbcheck is clean. > > [root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool

Hi All, On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02 and 03 are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable to fix.. Any hints? * Basic dbcheck is clean. [root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool dbcheck Checking 327 objects Checked 327 objects (0 errors) * Cross-NCS shows two errors related to a de-comissionned DC (dc02) and cannot auto-fix this.. How do I fix

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:19:10 -0500 (EST) "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:20:21 -0500 (EST) > > "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >>

On Tue, 22 Jan 2019, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:20:21 -0500 (EST) > "Vincent S. Cojot via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> >> Hi All, >> >> On my two-DC setup (dc00 and dc01 - Used to be a 4-Dc setup but 02 >> and 03 are gone), I've noticed the following errors which I am unable >> to

Hi, here're patches to avoid a database corruption with linked attributes, e.g. member/memberOf. See https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13228 As a temporary solution admins can add "server services = -kcc" to the global section of smb.conf. Also DO NOT repair the following errors with samba-tool dbcheck! "Remove duplicate links in attribute" and "ERROR:

Hi Denis, Thanks for taking the time to answer. Yes, I may have been wrong with --forced-sync and --full-sync since the start but in fact I wanted to make sure to force replication between the servers. Here is what I have noticed: - replication works from dc00 -> dc00 but not from dc01 -> dc00: [root at dc00 ~]# samba-tool drs replicate DC01 DC00 dc=ad,dc=lasthome,dc=solace,dc=krynn

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > wide quorum: Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of alternating outages. Thanks! > > > It would be great if you can consider configuring an arbiter or > > > replica 3 volume. > >

Hi Denis Thanks for your response without your crystal ball. I have increased the log level =9 dns:0 on both the servers. It replicates successfully by manually running the command samba-tool drs replicate SERVER2 SERVER1 dc=iumnet,dc=edu,dc=na --full-sync but it is still failing when I check from the samba-tool drs showrepl Also I run samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs --fix on both the servers

On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Dave Sherohman <dave at sherohman.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:00:29PM +0530, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > I will try to explain how you can end up in split-brain even with cluster > > wide quorum: > > Yep, the explanation made sense. I hadn't considered the possibility of > alternating outages. Thanks! > >

Release Announcements --------------------- This is a security release in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2023-3961:? Unsanitized pipe names allow SMB clients to connect as root to ????????????????? existing unix domain sockets on the file system. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2023-3961.html o CVE-2023-4091:? SMB client can truncate files to 0 bytes by opening files

Release Announcements --------------------- This is a security release in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2023-3961:? Unsanitized pipe names allow SMB clients to connect as root to ????????????????? existing unix domain sockets on the file system. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2023-3961.html o CVE-2023-4091:? SMB client can truncate files to 0 bytes by opening files

Hello, I have recompiled a Linux 2.4.18 kernel on my Sparc and I receive some oops when quick disk access are performed. For example : I download some files on a local server with ncftp (-TR directory), and ncftp hangs up (with kernel oops !). I cannot umount the device and I must reboot the station. For information, my sparc is a SparcStation 5 (85 MHz) with 160 Mbytes and 3 SCSI

Hi All, Please help me. I am now installing the XEN on my PC and trying to config the pci pass through. My motherboard is intel DQ45CB which is vtd enabled. I downloaded the latest xen4.0 source from xen.org which is the latest release. I downloaded stable-2.6.32-x dom0 kernel source from jeremy''s repository. After compiling the xen and dom0 kernel, I could play it. I could create

Hi All, Please help me. I am now installing the XEN on my PC and trying to config the pci pass through. My motherboard is intel DQ45CB which is vtd enabled. I downloaded the latest xen4.0 source from xen.org which is the latest release. I downloaded stable-2.6.32-x dom0 kernel source from jeremy''s repository. After compiling the xen and dom0 kernel, I could play it. I could create

Hi. I'm seeing some issues where Entourage clients can see new mail, download it (or partially), but won't display the mail in the mailbox list. Mail shows up as having arrived, but never displays. These clients have worked in the past with versions of 0.99, but not in 1.0-test-56. I have dumped the connection traffic and it looks like Entourage aborts the IMAP session before it

I feel dirty after trolling throught the .cf file. Plussed addresses will not work w/ procmail if there is a typo in the sendmail.mc Works: /etc/mail/sendmaill.mc Addr 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 0 2 4 6 8 A C E -------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---------------- 00000610 ---- ---- --0a 4645 4154 5552 4528 6d61 -----.FEATURE(ma 00000620 7371 7565 7261 6465

Are there any plans for a type of "snapshot" support, which could be use to make point in time consistent backups, similar to what lvm would allow you to do for a local volume? I'm really looking for a good way to back up my ocfs2 volume, but so far, all we've been able to use is rsync and custom scripts. Are there any other options? -- Michael S. Moody Sr. Systems

Hello, running xen 3.0.4_1 I find the following messages in /var/log/messages: kernel: peth0: received packet with own address as source address Is this something to worry about? The tcpdump shows the following pakets during that time: 14:58:05.546043 fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff (oui Unknown) > 09:00:2b:00:00:0f (oui Unknown), ethertype LAT (0x6004), length 81: 0x0000: 2808 0505 0502 131f