similar to: Where to find out documentation on how does Samba work ?

People: I have not solved my problem. I have only one DC with Zentyal 3.4 and I want to change it by samba 4.1.16. That's why if I can't join the samba to the existing domain I would not do anything else. The samba server error is this: (Command from samba) samba-tool domain join dtcf.etecsa.cu DC -U administrator --realm=DTCF.ETECSA.CU --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ (Response) No

No, I got the same result. On 02/09/2015 04:16 PM, Rowland Penny wrote: > > On 09/02/15 20:41, Denis Morejon Lopez wrote: >> >> Hi people: >> >> I can't join a second samba 4.1.16 domain controller to an existing >> domain. This domain just contain a DC based on Zentyal 3.4. >> >> When I try this from the samba server: >> >>

On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 13:54:25 -0500 Denis Morejon <denis.morejon at etecsa.cu> wrote: > Rowland: > > I think wiki is good. It's useful as a step by step guide to deploy > Samba. But I don't find a general explanation of how each piece works! > > A Samba AD DC is composed of several components, all working together. These components individually work just like

Hi people: I can't join a second samba 4.1.16 domain controller to an existing domain. This domain just contain a DC based on Zentyal 3.4. When I try this from the samba server: samba-tool domain join dtcf.etecsa.cu DC -U administrator --realm=dtcf.etecsa.cu --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ But it returns: No objectClass found in replPropertyMetaData for

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 07:37:38 -0500 Denis Morejon via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi: > > I have two samba 4.7.4 DCs. One of them has problems. I can not use > samba-tool on it. Then, when I try to fix It's database It returns: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >

I have been using two Zentyal 4.0 domain controllers for a long time. 3Gb of RAM each one and working okay. I have not updated them from Internet and my users are the same. Suddently, the first DC began to comsume memory to the top. I detected that samba processes are the responseble of this behavior. More processes with more memory come on. They get more and more memory in such a way that the

Hi: I'm trying to join a samba 4.3.4 (as an additional domain controller) to a domain with Zentyal 4.3 (That has samba 4.3.4 inside). I know that this is an old samba version but I cann't upgrade zentyal first. So, When I can join the samba 4.3.4 to the domain I will demote the Zentyal. But when I try: samba-tool domain join dtcf.etecsa.cu DC -U "DTCF\administrator"

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:39:56 +0200 Michal <Michal67M at seznam.cz> wrote: > > /etc/named.conf > > # Global Configuration Options > > > > include "/var/lib/samba/bind-dns/named.conf"; > > > > options { > > > > dump-file "/var/named/data/cache_dump.db"; > > statistics-file

It doesn't work for me. I put allow-transfer {"none";}; in named.conf.options. Reload the bind9 service.  but I can not avoid the zone transfer to the Active Directory Integrated Zone ! I use Samba 4.7.4 (From Source) and BIND 9.10.3-P4-Debian (Debian 9) This configuration works well on standard zones but not on DLZ (Samba) Zones. El 13/02/18 a las 08:52, L.P.H. van Belle via

Hi, I just solved this problem for myself: # samba-tool user add my-username-here User 'my-username-here' added successfully # samba-tool group addmembers 'Domain Admins' my-username-here Added members to group Domain Admins # samba-tool dns add localhost example.com testname A 10.0.0.2 -U my-username-here --password="my-password-here" Record added successfully >

Hi: How can I either deny zone transfer or restrict it to some DNS servers when using DLZ ?

Well, I'm using Samba 4.7.4 DC and bind 9.10.3 as DNS back end. I have a zone called mydomain.cu into Samba where are placed our workstations and servers records. This is my configuration. I want to prevent zone transfer attacks to this zone by restricting the hosts that could do it. I tried the allow-transfer {"none";}; in the named.conf.options file but It doesn't work.

On Tue, 17 Jan 2017 04:30:31 -0800 (PST) rawi via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Samba - General mailing list wrote > > And there is your problem, AD lives (or dies) on DNS, unlike NT. You > > have this line 'dns-nameservers 127.0.0.1' in your smb.conf. It is > > useless, it is pointing to itself and you are not running a dns > > server, even if

On 05/08/2019 10:14, Patrik wrote: > I am not using flatfiles and i using BIND_DLZ it shows in my log and i > do not use flatfiles. BIND_DLZ only. Oh yes you are, you have this in your /etc/bind/named.conf.local : ??? zone "patrikx3.com" { ??????? type master; ??????? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com"; ??????? include

Hello list, I need to know which DNS backend is using my domain controller. Where can I search to know my backend ? Are there a command to do this? Then, I have 2 DCs replicating each other (samba-tool domain join). Is it possible to have one of them using SAMBA_internal and the other using BIND_DLZ ? Regards, Phillip.

On 11/28/2017 2:38 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:53:32 -0600 > Dale Schroeder via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of >> dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because >> systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - >>

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > So, it sounds like you have a PDC for the domain 'DOMAIN' and an AD DC > for the domain 'DOMAIN' both using the same SID, I don't think this is > going to work. I suggest you turn the old PDC off. No no no! I'm not mad! ;-) There's the OLD PDC for the domain 'SVCORSI', and the new AD DC

... From your output below.. >> Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version << Then tell uss, why are 3 lines uncommented? I suggest, run : https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Anonimize it where needed, and show me your server setup. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van:

Last week, Debian testing (Buster) added apparmor to the list of dependencies for its latest kernel release, apparently because systemd needs it.  Recently, I noticed my first casualty - bind9 - due to apparmor failures with bind_dlz. Here is the initial journalctl results: Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc named[16080]: starting BIND 9.10.6-Debian <id:9d1ea0b> -f -u bind Nov 23 10:12:12 debpdc

I have about 400 users and 400 computers. But my samba db has about 40000 objects. I think it is so much. I have watched a lot of printer objects associated with the computer name on which they are attached. Is it normal ? Can I delete all of these printer objects ? Look at this: ldbsearch -H /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/DC\=DTCF\,DC\=ETECSA\,DC\=CU.ldb 'cn=*Laser*' dn ...