similar to: Machine level GPO always denied with "Filter: Denied (Security)

Hi all, Some (then all) of our workstations were complaining about incorrect ACLs on GPOs and were unable to read the gpt.ini to apply the GPOs. So I did a sysvolcheck and sure enough I'd lost the ACLs when I moved our sysvol share to a new location on the server (whoops, mea culpa). I ran a sysvolreset which took a long time to return (some 5 minutes, please see my post on slow winbind

I'm running rc6, but it's not a clean installation, it's samba3 upgraded to 4.0 in ages of beta2. samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck dies with message about incorrect acl on gpo, but that acl is set by sysvolreset. lobus at sirius-a:~$ sudo samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO

Hi, That's look more like a gpupdate output than an event log entry :-) Le 24/07/2016 à 20:46, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Hello Sébastien Le Ray, > > The PC reply the following... > > The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user > name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: > a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain

On my small, one DC AD setup, where I just followed the wiki and did not (!) make any other changes except for working on the AD through the RSAT, I ran samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and got the following output: --------------------snip-------------------- ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory

Hello Sébastien Le Ray, The PC reply the following... The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the user name. This could be caused by one or more of the following: a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller. b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller). The

Dear Sébastien, Sorry for the delay, Please check on the log below. As for the word "存取被拒。" it should translate to Access Deny... Please help. - <Event xmlns="*http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event <http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event>*"> - <System> <Provider Name="*Microsoft-Windows-GroupPolicy*"

Dear All, I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO are having issue Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate success fully. When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset But don't seem to got it fix.. Any suggestion? Thank in advance. #samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck Processing section

Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin / samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error? ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini

On 16/11/15 11:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > So I ran a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck, and the following error > message came up: > > --------------------snip-------------------- > ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception > - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory >

Hello, I've en error again in the samba AD world. I use RSAT with the DOMAIN\administrator account to make some GPOs. Sometimes it doesn't work. So I have checked GPO ACL with 'gpo aclcheck' command, and this is the return : got OID=1.2.840.48018.1.2.2 ERROR: Invalid GPO ACL

On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > See replies below > > On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 16/11/15 11:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> So I ran a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck, and the following error >>> message came up: >>> >>> --------------------snip-------------------- >>> ERROR(<class

Hi, No solutions to get out of this? -- Thanks & Regards, Anantha Raghava On 21/06/17 7:05 PM, Anantha Raghava wrote: > Hi, > > We have been consistently having issues with GPO and they are not > consistent. We are using version 4.6.3 with BIND DNS Backend. As > suggested in some of our previous communications, when we run the > samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it

On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: > > > Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >> >> >> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>> See replies below >>> >>> On 16.11.2015 12:39, Rowland Penny wrote: >>>> On 16/11/15 11:19, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>>> So I ran a samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck, and

On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 11:44:50 +0100 Kévin GUERINEAU via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello list, > > I have problems with my PDC Samba Servers and all file servers. > All DC Server have a compiled Samba 4.4.5. File servers have Samba > Debian packages. > > In all shared folders, the ACL has the group "Everyone" and I can't > remove it.

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ? > Do you have two domains ? Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just using it to compare. > I am also trying to understand why

On 16/11/15 14:00, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: > > > On 16.11.2015 14:44, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 16/11/15 13:25, Ole Traupe wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:06 schrieb Viktor Trojanovic: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 16.11.2015 13:48, Viktor Trojanovic wrote: >>>>> See replies below >>>>>

Dear, I'm having trouble handling GPO's my DC. Environment: Samba 4.4.5, primary and secondary DC. I am not allowed to edit the GPO's. The problem occurred after I edit the Default GPO in the primary DC, and then run the rsync to synchronize between the DC's. The following errors arise when squeegee commands: Note: I hid the actual domain name. # samba-tool gpo aclcheck

Hi all, We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the same 4.1.6. Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force tells me: "Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini from a domain controller and was not successful". Taken from the mailinglist, I

Hi, Do you have any specific error message in Windows events log concerning GPO? Regards Le 24/07/2016 à 05:40, Min Wai Chan a écrit : > Dear All, > I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO > are having issue > > Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate > success fully. > > When I run samba-tool ntacl

On 25/10/2020 20:20, Sonic wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ? >> Do you have two domains ? > Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was > also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just