similar to: idmap limit?

Hi, no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data example would look like: ---------- drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\group  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\group  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2

Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed user names: drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3        DOM\domain-user   4096 Jan 16 08:39 user3 drwx------   3        133265        DOM\domain-user   4096 Sep  7 2015 user4 drwx------   7       

Am 16.01.2018 um 17:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100 > Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed >> user names: >> >> drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 >> user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2       

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:22:44 +0100 Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > we are running a file server as member server of a windows 2012 > domain. Now we are facing the problem, that some UIDs are not mapped > to the user names by the running winbindd process. This results in > "nobody" usernames for nfs shares mounted by other

Hi, yes, there are some things. But I have not found a nice complete documentation. One main point is the domain name as prefix of the username of the parent domain, e.g. "DOM\user1", you have to use. I was not able to get rid of it, as the client is member of the subdomain which is the default. So you can't use the "default domain" option in smb.conf. The backslash

Hi Andreas, i'm sorry to jump on your thread as i can't really help you here. But as i have to setup an AD subdomain of a parent domain with the same requirements as yours apparently (aka parent domain managed by Windows server holds users/groups accounts on a distant location but the compute ressources and the GPO will be managed locally under a subdomain), i'm just wondering if you

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:20:52 +0100 Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > no, that's my fault. I changed the UIDs and user names in my "ls -l" > to unpersonalized/example data for my mail and didn't think about > putting these values into the range. A better unpersonalized data > example would look like: > >

On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:54:17 +0100 Andreas Hauffe via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok, you are completely right. Here are the real numbers with changed > user names: > > drwx------ 43 DOM\user1        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 10 08:00 > user1 drwx------   5 DOM\user2        DOM\domain-user  4096 Jan 11 > 08:13 user2 drwx------ 92 DOM\user3       

On 1/08/2016 10:01 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > Op 7/31/2016 om 4:27 AM schreef Reuben Farrelly: >> Hi, >> >> I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two >> hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. >> Has anyone else experienced the replication problem? Are sieve >> scripts actually replicating in live time for

Hi, I've observed some odd behaviour with dsync replication between two hosts, specifically to do with sieve script replication. In short, I have two hosts which replicate in a master-master type setup where almost all of the reads and writes happen to just one of the two hosts. They are both running 2.2.devel (9dc6403), which is close to the latest 2.2 -git . Pigeonhole is running

Dear All. I have a file server. I installed the samba on it to store the document. See below for the security : - group : + g1 : user1, user2,user3 + g2 : user4, user5,user6 + g3 : user1,user5 - folder : + folder A : set permission chmod 775 and group chown root:g3 The problem is when the user1 modified a file in folder A then that file add the group g1 automatically. So

Hello all, I could not find anything in the discussion groups or documentation about using LDAP and Unix group mappings. The documentation states that in order to map unix groups to samba groups, you need to use the net group add command. However, I have an ldap backend and all my groups, that I care about are in LDAP. So I have a group called mainwdev. dn:

_________________________________________________________________ http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M0906xWLM2009 Neu: Messenger 2009! Hier kostenlos downloaden!

I tried searching through the archives, but was unable to find anything about this. Everything regarding windbind and AD membership is working perfectly with one exception. Here's an example of what I'm experiencing: A group called "department_users" contains two groups "department_faculty" and "department_staff". These two groups,

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz.sig Looks like it took a bit longer to make this release after RC1 than I thought. I'm now in San Jose area for a few months and still jumping between apartments and trying to adjust to the new timezone. Some of the more important fixes since RC1: - Fixed several race conditions with

http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2.14.tar.gz.sig Looks like it took a bit longer to make this release after RC1 than I thought. I'm now in San Jose area for a few months and still jumping between apartments and trying to adjust to the new timezone. Some of the more important fixes since RC1: - Fixed several race conditions with

Hi, I have a data set: > Dataset X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17 1 user1 m 22 19 28 24 12 18 9 7 4 5 4 7 5 7 9 2 user2 f 25 19 23 18 18 15 6 8 6 6 7 10 7 7 7 3 user3 f 28 21 24 18 15 12 10 6 7 9 5 10 5 9 5 4 user4 f 26 19 26 21 12 18 6 6 5 1 3 8 6 5 6 5 user5 m 21 22 26 18 9 6 4 6 1

Dovecot version 2.1.7 Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Kernel 3.2.0-35-generic x86_64 I'm not sure exactly when this started occurring, but sporatically users report issues receiving email, having email saved to "Sent," etc. Looking in dovecot.log, I see the following errors: 2013-10-16 09:53:20 imap-login: Info: Login: user=<user1>, method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, mpid=27434,

I have a very small problem. Thanks for any suggestions. Say user1 logs onto a Windows XP workstation and opens file1. Then, if user2 attempts to open the file from another workstation the following message is displayed: "file1 is locked for editing by ''" Problem: *user1* is not displayed between the single quotes. However, say user1 logs onto a Win98 workstation and

Hello, Thanks for the advice. I have looked for the libs and here is the difference: Dovecot production env 2.2.10: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm rw-r--r-- 1 root root 18560 Jan 9 2014 lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14256 Jan 9 2014 lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10232 Jan 9 2014 lib10_doveadm_quota_plugin.so -rw-r--r-- 1 root root