similar to: Access to Windows 2016 server works with IP but not with netbios name

The client is a Windows 2008 R2 server. I don't know what you mean by classic vs. AD. I assume it's AD, but how would I check? I see the same problem, i.e. "Access is denied" and a window to enter the username/password, if I use the fully qualified name. Thanks, Rob On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Gaiseric Vandal via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Can

Hi, I just tried again and there's a window that says something about "looking for credentials file..." that pops up before I get the "Access is denied" and the login window. I don't know what that means, but since the window is only there very briefly I probably missed it on my earlier attempts. Thanks, Rob On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Rob Marshall

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:20:37 -0500 Rob Marshall via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I just tried again and there's a window that says something about > "looking for credentials file..." that pops up before I get the > "Access is denied" and the login window. I don't know what that > means, but since the window is only there

Can you clarify -  are they trying to access the samba server from a Win 2016 machine?     Is this a classic domain or AD domain? Do you have a WINS server defined?      Can you access via a fully qualified domain name (e.g. myserver.mydomain.com.)     I had an issue several years back where users connecting over VPN could access by IP but not my short name.       The problem was that the VPN

Just for reference, on a working Samba 4.x server in an AD domain I have the following entries Idmap config *:backend = tdb Idmap config *:range = 2000-2999 Idmap config MYDOMAIN:backend = ad Idmap config MYDOMAIN:schema_mode = rfc2307 Idmap config *:range = 1000-1999 I use active directory users and groups to explicitly set the uid and gid numbers (this was to keep everything happy

Hi, When I initially tested the "getent passwd testuser01" I got nothing back. I then did: "getent passwd "wg\testuser01"" and got the entry. A "troubleshooting" wiki I was reading suggested adding: "winbind use default domain = yes" to fix that. I added that and was then able to lookup the user without needing the "wg\". In looking at

As well as what share... Are you trying to access the \\*\netlogon or \\*\sysvol shares of a PDC? On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 8:25 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:20:37 -0500 > Rob Marshall via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I just tried again and there's a window that says

On 09/19/17 05:30, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 22:45:04 -0400 > Gaeseric Vandal via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I would like to move my Samba file server (Samba 4.4.14 on Solaris >> 11) from a classic domain into an Active Directory domain. The >> active directory domain has one Win 2008 directory server / domain

Hi all, i've got a strange behaviour with a BlackBerry Classic Phone (BBOS 10.3.2.2876) in combination with Dovecot 2.2.13 while trying to fetch mails. Before burying myself into debugging sessions, i try to get an understanding if the following is a Client- or a Server-specific error in the behaviour: CIGA8 UID FETCH 10009:10035 (UID FLAGS) (CHANGEDSINCE NOMODSEQ) CIGA8 BAD Error

Hi, Here's a modified (to protect the customer's information) truncated smb.conf that, for the most part, mirrors what they have: [global] log level = 3 os level = 1 security = ADS server string = TEST CIFS Server workgroup = WG netbios name = FRED1 realm = WB.DOM-NAME.COM idmap config * : range = 10000-20000 log

On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:21:42 -0800 Luke Barone <lukebarone at gmail.com> wrote: > As well as what share... Are you trying to access the \\*\netlogon or > \\*\sysvol shares of a PDC? > There wouldn't be a sysvol share on a PDC, or do you mean a DC ? Rowland

Dear Rowland, Thanks a lot for your anwswer ! Le 2017-10-17 20:16, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 > "Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : >> > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet >> > support except in the

On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:15:07 -0500 Rob Marshall <rob.marshall17 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I'm sorry if I just didn't understand what you were saying. I know > next to nothing about Samba and I'm looking at a customer environment. > I happen to support a product that includes Samba (which is stuck at a > 3.6.x variant because it's stuck on an

Hello, I'm in trouble here with what appears to be a total meltdown of my DNS on my Domain Controllers. I only have two DCs right now and I cannot resolve anything on either of them. I am on Ubuntu 16.04 with a compiled version of Samba 4.10.4. I also have a compiled version of BIND 9.10.3-P4-Ubuntu <id:ebd72b3> # service bind9 status ? bind9.service - BIND Domain Name Server ?

Hi, I want to use the SMB3 POSIX extensions in the latest Samba (with SMB3.1.1, vers=3.1.1). By following the user manual, I have added the "posix" mount option when mounting, but it shows the following error messages. Error messages: [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: Server does not support mounting with posix SMB3.11 extensions. [xxxxx] CIFS VFS: cifs_mount failed w/return code = -95 Mount option:

*Philippe MALADJIAN Responsable informatique | administrateur système* Ligne directe : +33 (0)4 72 14 50 66 | pmaladjian at hilaire.fr <mailto:pmaladjian at hilaire.fr> Le 03/10/2018 à 17:29, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:54:02 +0200 > Philippe Maladjian via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> *Philippe MALADJIAN >>

Nice shell script,?Louis. Here are the results: Collected config ?--- 2019-06-20-12:46 ----------- Hostname: umbriel DNS Domain: samdom.mycompany.net FQDN: umbriel.samdom.mycompany.net ipaddress: 192.168.3.203? ----------- Samba is running as an AD DC ----------- ? ? ? ?Checking file: /etc/os-release NAME="Ubuntu" VERSION="16.04.6 LTS (Xenial Xerus)" ID=ubuntu

On 19/01/2019 08:01, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> On 19 January 2019 at 02:07 Tim Dickson via dovecot < >> dovecot at dovecot.org <mailto:dovecot at dovecot.org>> wrote: >> >> >> i recently upgraded a server from dovecot 2.1 to 2.3 >> unfortunately sieve does not appear to be working. The user scripts have >> not changed, and neither has the

I've been working on this problem for a few hours. Here are some updates: Many of the domains I listed are duplicates of domains managed by other DNS servers on my network. There was no point in having them in Samba AD, so I deleted the zones in Windows DNS Manager and created slaves in my named.conf.local folder, so that they'd pull the records from my authoritative BIND DNS server,

https://portal.msrc.micro...idance/advisory/adv200005 Published: 03/10/2020 ? Workarounds The following workaround may be helpful in your situation. In all cases, Microsoft strongly recommends that you install the updates for this vulnerability as soon as they become available even if you plan to leave this workaround in place: Disable SMBv3 compression You can disable compression to block