Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "samba-tool ntacl sysvol check errors (samba 4.7.4 AD DC)"
2018 Jan 11
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvol check errors (samba 4.7.4 AD DC)
To answer my own question:
I solved it (I think).
There were 2 causes basically:
1) I had messed up idmap.ldb on DC's (one with PDC FSMO was fine, the
other two had more-or-less wrong mappings). I simply:
created hot backup of idmap.ldb on DC1, stopped samba on other dc's, and
overwritten idmap.ldb there.
the above solved issue of GPO not being accessed
2) sysvolcheck was a bit
2016 Apr 22
3
Samba 4.4.2 "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" is not working correctly
Samba 4.4.2
I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave
some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck
again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the
result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default
Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies
2018 Jul 30
4
gpupdate /force not applied
The principle was not made any changes to occur this problem.
We infra have dc3 and dc4 ADDC.
root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V
Version 4.7.7-Debian (van-blle apt)
Result of gpupdate /force in a joined computer client:
C:\>gpupdate /force
> Updating Policy...
> User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were
> encountered:
> The processing of Group Policy
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
That's not a problem its just a ACL provisioning message as you can see
the result was "DAG:DAD:PAI" but expected was "O:DAG:DAD:PAR" that's
"normal" ;-) just ignore it or do a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset"
Am 19.10.23 um 17:27 schrieb bd730c5053df9efb via samba:
> Hi!
>
> I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Hi!
I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet.
ERROR(<class
2014 Jun 23
1
Command samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin /
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error?
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini
2015 Oct 02
3
sysvol acl's broken beyond repair
Hi everyone.
I ran into notorios gpo error on windows clients. When I go to my dc
controller and run
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
I get an error:
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tsnr.mtt/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ?
> Do you have two domains ?
Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was
also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just using it to
compare.
> I am also trying to understand why
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this
> shows that extended acls set, to see these:
>
> getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol
The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes:
user:3000001:r-x
user:3000002:rwx
user:3000003:r-x
2015 Nov 16
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and sysvolreset
On my small, one DC AD setup, where I just followed the wiki and did not
(!) make any other changes except for working on the AD through the
RSAT, I ran samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and got the following output:
--------------------snip--------------------
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear All,
I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO
are having issue
Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate
success fully.
When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
But don't seem to got it fix..
Any suggestion?
Thank in advance.
#samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Processing section
2020 May 19
2
sysvolcheck and sysvolreset errors
> You could try using a script Louis wrote, see here:
> https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/blob/master/samba-check-set-sysvol.sh
>
> The 'idmap config' lines are nothing to worry about, you cannot set them on a DC, but, for some reason, testparm etc warns about
> them.
>
> Rowland
>
Sorry, I should have said - I ran louis' script and set the acl's according
2014 May 13
1
GPO problems on a 4.1.6 AD, classicupgraded, uncaught exception
Hi all,
We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or
two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the
same 4.1.6.
Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force
tells me:
"Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini
from a domain controller and was not successful".
Taken from the mailinglist, I
2018 May 25
2
syscolcheck error / Could not convert sid S-1-5-32-544 to uid
Hello,
this is a Samba AD Domain upgraded from Samba 3.x with classicupgrade.
Debian 9.4
Samba: 4.7.6 (packages from tranquil.it)
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
netbios name = DC1
realm = IWW.LAN
server role = active directory domain controller
workgroup = IWW
idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
dns forwarder = 172.16.1.12
dsdb:schema update
2020 Oct 25
0
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On 25/10/2020 20:20, Sonic wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>> What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ?
>> Do you have two domains ?
> Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was
> also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just
2017 Aug 24
4
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version
> Version 4.5.8-Debian
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error"
> no error
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
> ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2017 Aug 24
3
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
On 2017-08-24 12:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:03:42 +0200
> Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>>> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version
>>> Version 4.5.8-Debian
>>> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error"
>>> no error
>>> root at
2014 May 23
1
Cannot edit GPO's anymore via RSAT
Hello all,
I have recently discovered that my user cannot edit GPO's anymore. Every
GPO I try to open, gets me the famous window "*The permissions for this GPO
in the SYSVOL folder are inconsistent with those in Active Directory" * and
then I get another window saying "Access is denied".
I believe that this happened when I upgraded to 4.1.7 from 4.1.3, about 3
weeks ago,
2017 Apr 25
1
"This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object" when trying to create a GPO
I have upgraded Samba from a NT PDC to an AD DC about a week ago.
Everything went pretty well until today. I've already configured about
25 GPO's (through RSAT on a Windows 10 machine) - but when I came to add
more GPO's - it wouldn't let me with the above error message. My specs are:
Samba 4.5.0
Slackware -current 64bit
Kernel 4.4.20
The client machine is a Windows 10 Pro.
2016 Oct 03
0
Failure permission in Sysvol and GPO
Dear,
I'm having trouble handling GPO's my DC.
Environment:
Samba 4.4.5, primary and secondary DC.
I am not allowed to edit the GPO's.
The problem occurred after I edit the Default GPO in the primary DC, and then run the rsync to synchronize between the DC's.
The following errors arise when squeegee commands:
Note: I hid the actual domain name.
# samba-tool gpo aclcheck