Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "samba-tool ntacl sysvol check errors (samba 4.7.4 AD DC)"
2014 Jun 23
1
Command samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Can anyone explain what is happening when I run / usr / local / samba / bin /
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it and an error?
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO file
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tdsfs01.net/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}/USER/Scripts/scripts.ini
2018 Jul 30
4
gpupdate /force not applied
The principle was not made any changes to occur this problem.
We infra have dc3 and dc4 ADDC.
root at dc3:/etc/samba# samba -V
Version 4.7.7-Debian (van-blle apt)
Result of gpupdate /force in a joined computer client:
C:\>gpupdate /force
> Updating Policy...
> User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were
> encountered:
> The processing of Group Policy
2015 Oct 02
3
sysvol acl's broken beyond repair
Hi everyone.
I ran into notorios gpo error on windows clients. When I go to my dc
controller and run
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
I get an error:
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
/usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol/tsnr.mtt/Policies/{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ?
> Do you have two domains ?
Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was
also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just using it to
compare.
> I am also trying to understand why
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
That's not a problem its just a ACL provisioning message as you can see
the result was "DAG:DAD:PAI" but expected was "O:DAG:DAD:PAR" that's
"normal" ;-) just ignore it or do a "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset"
Am 19.10.23 um 17:27 schrieb bd730c5053df9efb via samba:
> Hi!
>
> I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck"
2015 Nov 16
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and sysvolreset
On my small, one DC AD setup, where I just followed the wiki and did not
(!) make any other changes except for working on the AD through the
RSAT, I ran samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck and got the following output:
--------------------snip--------------------
ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception -
ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2023 Oct 19
1
Error in samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Hi!
I executed the command "samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" on a DC and I got the following I pasted below. The first DC was provisioned migrating from a samba NT4 PDC with an LDAP backend using the classic upgrade procedure. I haven't detected any problem but I wanted to make sure there isn't any problem I might not be seeing yet.
ERROR(<class
2018 Jan 11
0
samba-tool ntacl sysvol check errors (samba 4.7.4 AD DC)
To answer my own question:
I solved it (I think).
There were 2 causes basically:
1) I had messed up idmap.ldb on DC's (one with PDC FSMO was fine, the
other two had more-or-less wrong mappings). I simply:
created hot backup of idmap.ldb on DC1, stopped samba on other dc's, and
overwritten idmap.ldb there.
the above solved issue of GPO not being accessed
2) sysvolcheck was a bit
2016 Apr 22
3
Samba 4.4.2 "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset" is not working correctly
Samba 4.4.2
I was doing some maintenance work and I noticed that sysvolcheck gave
some error. I ran "samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset". Running sysvolcheck
again still gives errors. I tried with several sysvol backups and the
result is always the same. The affected policies are always "Default
Domain Policy" and "Default Domain Controllers Policy". These policies
2014 May 13
1
GPO problems on a 4.1.6 AD, classicupgraded, uncaught exception
Hi all,
We'er running a classicupgraded samba4 AD 4.1.6 sernet for a month or
two now, and all is very well. :-) It has been classicupgraded using the
same 4.1.6.
Today I wanted to try GPO's and they are not applied. GPUpdate /force
tells me:
"Windows attempted to read the file blahblah\gpt.ini
from a domain controller and was not successful".
Taken from the mailinglist, I
2020 Oct 25
0
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On 25/10/2020 20:20, Sonic wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 4:02 PM Rowland penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>> What do you mean by 'working domain' and 'non-working domain' ?
>> Do you have two domains ?
> Different sites, different companies, not related. The working one was
> also a classic upgrade but earlier on, pre 4.6.x. Just
2016 Jul 24
3
Samba 4.2.14 GPO issue
Dear All,
I've recently upgrade from samba 4.1.x to samba 4.2.14 and found that GPO
are having issue
Specifically when I'm adding new using they *never *got the gpupdate
success fully.
When I run samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck or samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
But don't seem to got it fix..
Any suggestion?
Thank in advance.
#samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
Processing section
2018 May 25
2
syscolcheck error / Could not convert sid S-1-5-32-544 to uid
Hello,
this is a Samba AD Domain upgraded from Samba 3.x with classicupgrade.
Debian 9.4
Samba: 4.7.6 (packages from tranquil.it)
# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf
[global]
netbios name = DC1
realm = IWW.LAN
server role = active directory domain controller
workgroup = IWW
idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
dns forwarder = 172.16.1.12
dsdb:schema update
2014 May 23
1
Cannot edit GPO's anymore via RSAT
Hello all,
I have recently discovered that my user cannot edit GPO's anymore. Every
GPO I try to open, gets me the famous window "*The permissions for this GPO
in the SYSVOL folder are inconsistent with those in Active Directory" * and
then I get another window saying "Access is denied".
I believe that this happened when I upgraded to 4.1.7 from 4.1.3, about 3
weeks ago,
2020 Oct 25
2
GPO fail and sysvol perm errors
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 3:31 PM Rowland penny via samba
<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> OK, if you look at the end of the permissions, there is a '+' sign, this
> shows that extended acls set, to see these:
>
> getfacl /usr/local/samba/var/locks/sysvol
The difference in acls is that the non-working domain includes:
user:3000001:r-x
user:3000002:rwx
user:3000003:r-x
2017 Apr 25
1
"This security ID may not be assigned as the owner of this object" when trying to create a GPO
I have upgraded Samba from a NT PDC to an AD DC about a week ago.
Everything went pretty well until today. I've already configured about
25 GPO's (through RSAT on a Windows 10 machine) - but when I came to add
more GPO's - it wouldn't let me with the above error message. My specs are:
Samba 4.5.0
Slackware -current 64bit
Kernel 4.4.20
The client machine is a Windows 10 Pro.
2017 Aug 24
3
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
On 2017-08-24 12:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:03:42 +0200
> Sven Schwedas via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>>> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version
>>> Version 4.5.8-Debian
>>> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error"
>>> no error
>>> root at
2017 Aug 24
4
sysvolreset doesn't reset all ACLs
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba --version
> Version 4.5.8-Debian
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset && echo "no error"
> no error
> root at graz-dc-1b:~# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
> ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): uncaught exception - ProvisioningError: DB ACL on GPO directory
2018 Jul 30
0
gpupdate /force not applied
I had set up a trust relationship between our domain and another configured
domain on our network, and at first it seems that this is what caused the
GPO problem. I removed the trust and it all worked again.
In internal tests that I had done, everything worked normal. Of course this
is different when we put it into production. :)
I know the trust is not 100%, but would you have any way to
2017 Jun 21
3
Fwd: AD Policies are not applying properly
Hi,
We have been consistently having issues with GPO and they are not
consistent. We are using version 4.6.3 with BIND DNS Backend. As
suggested in some of our previous communications, when we run the
samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck it results in the error as detailed below.
[root at dc1 ~]# samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck
lp_load_ex: refreshing parameters
Initialising global parameters
rlimit_max: